Abstract
The European Union (EU) seeks to differentiate itself from other international actors, such as its model for regional integration. In the process of defining itself, the EU mainly focuses on self-perception (Lucarelli, GARNET Working Paper: Research Report: The External Image of the European Union, 17, 27, 2007a). Recently, studies of external perception have been viewed as an essential missing element in the EU identity-building process. At the same time, the EU’s interregional actorness in Asia suffered lately from relevant weaknesses, reflected, for example, in the EU’s switch to bilateral negotiations following unsuccessful region-to-region negotiations to establish the Free Trade Agreement with ASEAN, as well as by the apparent fatigue within ASEM. This research tries to shed light on the EU’s efforts as an interregional actor in Asia, while being at the same time a global power in the making by analyzing the way in which two Asian emerging powers, China and India, perceive the EU’s regional integration, utilizing recent surveys conducted among the Chinese and Indian elites and media. The paper hereby establishes an important link between perceptions and their role in foreign policymaking.
As the Union develops as a strategic player, […] it must start listening to what the world thinks about it (Lynch 2005, p. 11)
This contribution is based on research within a postgraduate program at the College of Europe in EU International Relations and Diplomacy Studies, conducted simultaneously at the United Nations University and the Institute on Comparative Regional Integration Studies. On the same basis a shorter paper under the same title was presented at the First Euroacademia Global Conference “Europe Inside-Out: Europe and Europeaness Exposed to Plural Observers” in Vienna, Austria on 22–24 September 2011.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Recent publications in the Journal of Common Market Studies, the European Journal of International Relations or GARNET Research Project “The External Image of the European Union” directed by Sonia Lucarelli.
- 2.
Here and after, a meaning of “elites” following Lucarelli (2007a, p. 33): “Political elites are significant players who give rise to global events and constitute an important factor in shaping the overall image of the EU around the world. This survey [… is] examining the main documents issued by political parties and governments in a sample of countries […] with the aim of providing an indicative outline of how the EU is perceived by political elites in those countries.”
References
Agnelli, S. (1996). Asia-Europe forum on culture, values and technology. Venice: Giorgio Cini Foundation.
Anderson, P. (2007). Speaking the East, framing the East or shaping the East? European Studies, 25, 83–102.
Anderson, P., & Wiessala, G. (2007). Introduction. European Studies, 25, 15–28.
Bello, V. (2010). The European international identity considered from outside. European, African and Asian interaction. In V. Bello & B. Gebrewold (Eds.), A global security triangle: European, African and Asian interaction (pp. 56–73). London: Routledge.
Bingran, D., & Shuangquan, Z. (2007). EU perceptions in China. In N. Chaban, M. Holland, A. Z. Nowak, & P. Ryan (Eds.), The EU through the Eyes of Asia: Media, public and elite perceptions in China, Japan, Korea, Singapore and Thailand (pp. 43–67). Singapore: Asia-Europe Foundation.
Bretherton, C., & Vogler, J. (2006). The European Union as a global actor. London: Routledge.
Camroux, D. (2010). Interregionalism or merely a fourth-level game? An examination of the EU-ASEAN relationship. East Asia, 27(1), 57–77.
Carta, C. (2010). Close enough? The EU’s global role described by non-European diplomats in Brussels. In L. Fioramonti & S. Lucarelli (Eds.), External perceptions of the European Union as a global actor (pp. 207–217). London: Routledge.
Chaban, N., Elgström, O., & Holland, M. (2006). The European Union as others see it. European Foreign Affairs Review, 11(2), 245–262.
Chaban, N., Holland, M., Nowak, A. Z., & Ryan, P. (2007). The EU through the eyes of Asia: Media, public and elite perceptions in China, Japan, Korea, Singapore and Thailand. Singapore: Asia-Europe Foundation.
China’s EU Policy Paper. (2003). Retrieved April 12, 2011 from http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/eng/topics/ceupp/t27708.htm
Clegg, J. (2009). China views Europe: A multi-polar perspective. European Studies, 27, 123–137.
Elgström, O. (2006). Leader or foot-dragger? Perceptions of the European Union in multilateral international negotiations. Stockholm: Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies.
European Council. (2001, December). Laeken Declaration on the Future of Europe. Annex to the Presidency Conclusions, Laeken. Retrieved April 12, 2011 from http://ec.europa.eu/governance/impact/background/docs/laeken_concl_en.pdf
European Council. (2003, December). A secure Europe in a better world: The European security strategy. Brussels. Retrieved April 12, 2011 from http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cmsUpload/78367.pdf
Farrell, M. (2009). EU policy towards other regions: Policy learning in the external promotion of regional integration. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(8), 1165–1184.
Fioramonti, L. (2007a). Different facets of a strategic partnership: How the EU is viewed by political and business elites, civil society and the press in India. European Foreign Affairs Review, 12(3), 349–362.
Fioramonti, L. (2007b). Report on India. GARNET Working Paper Research Report: The External Image of the European Union, 17, 197–222.
Fioramonti, L., & Lucarelli, S. (2008). How do the others see us? European political identity and the external image of the EU. In F. Cerutti & S. Lucarelli (Eds.), The search for a European identity. Values, policies and legitimacy of the EU (pp. 193–210). London: Routledge.
Fioramonti, L., & Lucarelli, S. (2010). Conclusions: Self-representations and external perceptions – can the EU bridge the gap? In L. Fioramonti & S. Lucarelli (Eds.), External perceptions of the European Union as a global actor (pp. 218–225). London: Routledge.
Fioramonti, L., & Poletti, A. (2008). Facing the giant: Southern perspectives on the European Union. Third World Quarterly, 29(1), 167–180.
Geeraerts, G. (2007). In the eyes of the dragon: Chinese perceptions of the EU as a global actor. BICCS Asia Paper, 1(4).
Hill, C. (1993). The capability-expectations gap, or conceptualizing Europe’s international role. Journal of Common Market Studies, 31(3), 305–328.
Holland, M. (2007). Assuming superpower status? Evolving Asian perceptions of the EU as a political and economic actor. In N. Chaban, M. Holland, A. Z. Nowak, & P. Ryan (Eds.), The EU through the eyes of Asia: Media, public and elite perceptions in China, Japan, Korea, Singapore and Thailand (pp. 225–245). Singapore: Asia-Europe Foundation.
Holland, M., & Chaban, N. (2010). Perspectives on the role of the EU: A study of Asian stakeholders’ opinions from six countries. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.
Holland, M., Ryan, P., Nowak, A. Z., & Chaban, N. (2007). The EU through the eyes of Asia. In N. Chaban, M. Holland, A. Z. Nowak, & P. Ryan (Eds.), The EU through the eyes of Asia: Media, public and elite perceptions in China, Japan, Korea, Singapore and Thailand (pp. 23–29). Singapore: Asia-Europe Foundation.
Islam, S. (2005). How they see us. E!Sharp, January–February, 59.
Islam, S. (2010). A seat for the EU at East Asia’s top table. EUobserver.com. Retrieved April 12, 2011 from http://euobserver.com/9/31241
Jain, R. K. (2005). How they see us. E!Sharp, March–April, 64.
Jain, R. K. (2007). European integration and South Asian regionalism. Lessons and relevance of European experiences. In L. Dong & G. Heiduk (Eds.), The EU’s experience in integration. A model for ASEAN+3? (pp. 117–144). Bern: Peter Lang.
Jain, R. K. (2008). The EU and India’s low profile relations. (FRIDE Working Paper). IBSA: An international actor and partner for the EU? Madrid: FRIDE. Retrieved April 2, 2011 from http://www.fride.org/descarga/WP63_IBSA2_International_Actor_ENG_jul08.pdf
Jain, R. K., & Pandey, S. (2010). The European Union in the eyes of India. Asia Europe Journal, 8(2), 193–209.
Joffé, G. H. (2001). Preface: Regionalism – a new paradigm? In M. Telò (Ed.), European Union and new regionalism: Regional actors and global governance in a post-hegemonic era (pp. xiii–xiv). Aldershot: Ashgate.
Jora, S. (2007). Patterns of development through ‘Europeanization’ – Towards a universal Modus Operandi? In L. Dong & G. Heiduk (Eds.), The EU’s experience in integration. A model for ASEAN+3? (pp. 63–78). Bern: Peter Lang.
Liqun, Z. (2008). Chinese perceptions of the EU and the China-Europe relationship. In D. Shambaugh, E. Sandschneider, & Z. Hong (Eds.), China–Europe relations. Perceptions, policies and prospects (pp. 148–173). London: Routledge.
Lisbonne-de Vergeron, K. (2006). Contemporary Indian views of Europe. London: Chatham House.
Lisbonne-de Vergeron, K. (2007). Contemporary Chinese views of Europe. London: Chatham House.
Lucarelli, S. (2007a). Introduction: EU political identity, foreign policy and external image. GARNET Working Paper: Research Report: The External Image of the European Union, 17, 24–36.
Lucarelli, S. (2007b). The European Union in the eyes of others: Towards filling a gap in the literature. European Foreign Affairs Review, 12(3), 249–270.
Lucarelli, S., & Fioramonti, L. (2010). The EU in the eyes of the others – why bother? In L. Fioramonti & S. Lucarelli (Eds.), External perceptions of the European Union as a global actor (pp. 1–9). London: Routledge.
Lynch, D. (2005). Communicating Europe to the world: what public diplomacy for the EU? European Policy Centre Working Paper, 21. Retrieved April 7, 2011 from http://www.epc.eu/documents/uploads/251965810_EPC%2021.pdf
Mei, Z. (2004). Significance of EU eastward expansion and its impact on international situation and Sino-European relations. Foreign Affairs Journal, 71, 5.
Men, J. (2006). Chinese perceptions of the European Union: A review of leading Chinese journals. European Law Journal, 12(6), 788–806.
Parello-Plesner, J. (2010). East Asia Summit: Where is Europe? Resource document. European Council on Foreign Relations. Retrieved April 12, 2011 from http://ecfr.eu/content/entry/commentary_east_asia_summit_where_is_europe/
Peruzzi, R., Poletti, A., & Zhang, S. (2007). Report on China. GARNET Working Paper: Research Report: The External Image of the European Union, 17, 148–179.
Petchsiri, A. (2007). Asia in the making of Europe, Europe’s heritage in Asia and Asia as Europe’s other. European Studies, 25, 31–53.
Rhodes, C. (1998). Introduction: The identity of the European Union in international affairs. In C. Rhodes (Ed.), The European Union in the world community (pp. 3–11). Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
Schulz, N. (2010). Why the EU is not yet a mature development partner. FRIDE Policy Brief, 37, 1–5.
Smith, K. E. (2003a). European Union foreign policy in a changing world. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Smith, K. E. (2003b). The European Union: A distinctive actor in international relations. The Brown Journal of World Affairs, 9(2), 103–113.
Söderbaum, F., & Van Langenhove, L. (2005). Introduction: The EU as a global actor and the role of interregionalism. European Integration, 27(3), 249–262.
Stråth, B. (2002). Introductory report. Intercultural dialogue. Brussels: Office for Official Publications of the EU.
Subhan, M. (1996). Understanding Asian values. Brussels: European Institute for Asian Studies.
Toje, A. (2008). The European Union as a small power, or conceptualizing Europe’s strategic actorness. European Integration Journal, 30(2), 199–215.
Tsuruoka, M. (2008a). ‘Expectations deficit’ in EU-Japan relations: Why the relationship cannot flourish. Current Politics and Economics of Asia, 17(1), 107–126.
Tsuruoka, M. (2008b, April 24–26). How external perceptions of the European Union are shaped: Endogenous and exogenous sources. Paper prepared for the GARNET Conference The EU in International Affairs, Brussels.
Wagner, C. (2008). The EU and India: A deepening partnership. Chaillot Paper: Partnerships for Effective Multilateralism. EU Relations with Brazil, China, India and Russia, 109, 87–103.
Wang, X. (2007). Integration and the peaceful change of regional order: European Experience and East Asian strategic choice. In L. Dong & G. Heiduk (Eds.), The EU’s experience in integration. A Model for ASEAN+3? (pp. 93–115). Bern: Peter Lang.
Wiessala, G. (2002). The European Union and Asian countries. London: Sheffield Academic Press.
Xiaoping, L. (2007). Chinese television coverage and Chinese perceptions of Sino-EU relations. In D. Kerr & L. Fei (Eds.), The international politics of EU-China relations (pp. 102–117). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zhe, S. (2010, November 19). Bridge over troubled perceptions. Remarks on the Madariaga-College of Europe Foundation Conference Tearing Down the Great Wall of Ignorance Between China and the EU, Brussels.
Zhu, G. (2007a). Comparing the European model and the ASEAN Way: Is there a third way of regionalism for the East Asian Cooperation? In L. Dong & G. Heiduk (Eds.), The EU’s experience in integration. A model for ASEAN+3? (pp. 145–170). Bern: Peter Lang.
Zhu, J. (2007b). Enlightenment of European integration to ASEAN+3. In L. Dong & G. Heiduk (Eds.), The EU’s experience in integration. A model for ASEAN+3? (pp. 79–90). Bern: Peter Lang.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Smolińska, R. (2013). Discovering the Icebergs of EU Interregional Actorness in Asia: The EU “Unique” Regional Integration Model in the Eyes of China and India. In: Boening, A., Kremer, JF., van Loon, A. (eds) Global Power Europe - Vol. 2. Global Power Shift. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32416-1_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32416-1_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-32415-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-32416-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)