Advertisement

The European Union in the Northern Latitudes

  • Małgorzata ŚmieszekEmail author
Chapter
  • 1.2k Downloads
Part of the Global Power Shift book series (GLOBAL)

Abstract

One of the consequences of climate change has been the growing interest in the Arctic region. The unprecedented rate at which the Arctic ice coverage is melting and its implications for security, maritime transport and the energy sector have resulted in a steady growth in the region’s geopolitical and strategic importance. The purpose of the presented contribution is to highlight the potential for the external action of the European Union with regard to the High North in the light of recent developments and actions taken by the Arctic nations and other global players. The paper explores the Arctic’s present governance system and the positions taken by major actors in the region, followed by an analysis of the EU Arctic policy up to the present day. It concludes with potential fields for development to overcome the EU’s external and internal constraints in its action towards the region of the High North in order to make its mark within the changing environment of world politics and to secure its place among the global powers.

Keywords

Arctic Region Foreign Affair International Maritime Organization Maritime Transport Arctic State 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Arctic Council (2008). The Ilulissat declaration. Ilulissat, Greenland: Arctic Ocean Conference, 27–29 May. Accessed May 11, 2012, from http://uk.nanoq.gl/Emner/News/News_from_Parliament/2008/05/~/media/66562304FA464945BB621411BFFB6E12.ashx
  2. Byers, M. (2010). Who Owns the Arctic: Understanding Sovereignty Disputes in the North. Vancouver: Douglas & McIntyre.Google Scholar
  3. Cavalieri, S., McGlynn, E., & Stoessel, S., et al. (2010). EU Arctic Footprint and Policy Assessment. Berlin: Ecology Institute. Accessed June 15, 2012, from http://arctic-footprint.eu/sites/default/files/AFPA_Final_Report.pdf
  4. Conley, H. A., Toland, T., & Kraut, J. (2012). A New Security Architecture for the Arctic. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies.Google Scholar
  5. Council of the European Union. (2009, December 8). Council Conclusions on Arctic Issues, 2985th Foreign Affairs Council Meeting. Brussels: Council of the European Union.Google Scholar
  6. Emmerson, C. (2011). The Future History of the Arctic: How Climate, Resources and Geopolitics are Reshaping the North, and Why It Matters to the World. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
  7. Emmerson, Ch., & Lahn, G. (2012). Arctic Opening: Opportunity and Risk in the High North. Chatham House-Lloyd’s Risk Insight Report. Accessed May 14, 2012, from http://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/public/Research/Energy,%20Environment%20and%20Development/0412arctic.pdf
  8. European Commission. (2007). The European Union and Russia: Close Neighbours, Global Players, Strategic Partners. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  9. European Commission. (2008). The European Union and the Arctic. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council. Brussels: European Commission. [20 November, COM(2008) 763 final].Google Scholar
  10. European Commission. (2009). Strategic goals and recommendations for the EUs maritime transport policy until 2018. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council. Brussels: European Commission. [21 January, COM(2009) 8 final].Google Scholar
  11. European Commission (2011). Maritime transport. What do we want to achieve? Accessed June 15, 2012, from http://ec.europa.eu/transport/maritime/index_en.htm
  12. European Parliament. (2008). Arctic governance: European Parliament resolution of 9 October 2008 on Arctic governance. Brussels: European Parliament. [9 October, P6_TA(2008)0474].Google Scholar
  13. Finland, P. M. O. (2010). Finland’s Strategy for the Arctic Region. Helsinki: Prime Minister’s Office Finland.Google Scholar
  14. Government Offices of Sweden. (2012). The Arctic: Swedens strategy for the region. Accessed May 14, 2012, from http://www.sweden.gov.se/sb/d/14766/a/167998
  15. Heininen, L. (2010). Finland’s Arctic strategy: Important sectors and objectives. GeoPolitics in the high North. Accessed May 10, 2012, from http://www.geopoliticsnorth.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&layout=blog&id=38&Itemid=106
  16. Heininen, L. (2012). Arctic Strategies and Policies. Inventory and Comparative Study. Northern Research Forum. Accessed May 16, 2012, from http://www.nrf.is/images/stories/Hveragerdi/Arctic_strategies_7th_draft_New_20120428.pdf
  17. High Representative and the European Commission. (2008). Climate Change and International Security: Paper from the High Representative and the European Commission to the European Council. Brussels: High Representative and the European Commission. [14 March, S113/08].Google Scholar
  18. Ingimundarson, V. (2008). Iceland’s Security Policy and Geopolitics in the North. In K. Skogrand (Ed.), Emerging from the Frost. Security in the 21st century Arctic (pp. 9–15). Oslo Files on Defence and Security 02/2008. Accessed May 8, 2012, from http://brage.bibsys.no/fhs/bitstream/URN:NBN:no-bibsys_brage_26263/1/OF_2_2008.pdf
  19. International Northern Sea Route Programme, INSROP Overview. Accessed May 5, 2012, from http://www.fni.no/insrop/
  20. Jakobson, L. (2010). China prepares for an ice-free Arctic. SIPRI Insights on Peace and Security. No. 2010/2. Accessed May 10, 2012, from http://books.sipri.org/files/insight/SIPRIInsight1002.pdf
  21. Järvenpää, P., & Ries, T. (2011). The Rise of the Arctic on the Global Stage. In J. Kraska (Ed.), Arctic Security in an Age of Climate Change (pp. 129–144). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Koivurova, T. (2009). Limits and possibilities of the Arctic Council in a rapidly changing scene of Arctic governance. Polar Record, 46(02), 146–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lundestad, K. (2009). US Security Policy and Regional Relations in a Warming Arctic. Swords and ploughshares (Vol. XVII, no. 3). Accessed May 14, 2012, from http://acdis.illinois.edu/assets/docs/505/articles/USSecurityPolicyandRegionalRelationsinaWarmingArctic.pdf
  24. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark. (2011). Denmark, Greenland and the Faroe Islands: Kingdom of Denmark Strategy for the Arctic 2011–2020. Copenhagen/Nuuk/Tinganes: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark.Google Scholar
  25. Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2011). The High North. Visions and strategies. Oslo/Tromsø: Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.Google Scholar
  26. Offerdal, K. (2011). The EU in the Arctic. In pursuit of legitimacy and influence. International Journal, LXVI(4), 861–877.Google Scholar
  27. Perovich, D., Meier, W., Maslanik, J., & Richter-Menge, J. (2011). Sea Ice. In J. Richter-Menge, M. O. Jeffries, J. E. Overland (Eds.), Arctic Report Card 2011. Accessed May 5, 2012, from http://www.arctic.noaa.gov/reportcard
  28. Powell, R. C. (2011). From the Northern Dimension to Arctic Strategies? The European Union’s Envisioning of the High Latitudes. In L. Bialasiewicz (Ed.), Europe in the World. EU Geopolitics and the Making of European Space (pp. 105–126). Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  29. Smith, A. (2009, September 17). Global Warming Reopens the Northeast Passage. Time. Accessed May 5, 2012, from http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1924410,00.html
  30. Stokke, O. S. (2011). Environmental security in the Arctic. The case for multilevel governance. International Journal, LXVI (4), 835–848Google Scholar
  31. U.S. Geological Survey (2008). 90 Billion Barrels of Oil and 1,670 Trillion Cubic Feet of Natural Gas Assessed in the Arctic. Accessed May 5, 2012, http://www.usgs.gov/newsroom/article.asp?ID=1980
  32. United Nations (1982). The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Accessed June 4, 2012, from http://www.un.org/Depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/unclos_e.pdf
  33. Weber, S., & Romanyshyn, I. (2011). Breaking the ice. The European Union and the Arctic. International Journal, LXVI(4), 849–860.Google Scholar
  34. White House (2009). National Security Presidential Directive/ NSPD—66/ Homeland Security Presidential Directive/ HSPD—25. Washington, DC: Office of the Press Secretary.Google Scholar
  35. Zysk, K. (2010). Russia’s Arctic Strategy. Ambitions and Constraints. Joint force quarterly, NDU Press, 57/2010. Accessed May 15, 2012, from http://www.ndu.edu/press/lib/images/jfq-57/zysk.pdf

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Europe/Jagiellonian UniversityWarszawaPoland

Personalised recommendations