Skip to main content

Distributional Assumptions and Parametric Uncertainties in the Aggregation of Geologic Resources

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 1840 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Earth System Sciences ((LNESS))

Abstract

Complexities in the stochastic characterization of geologic resources extending over large geographical areas often force a subdivision of the ultimate area of interest. Oil, gas, hydrates, mineral resources, and carbon dioxide storage units are typically estimated at the level of a pool, reservoir, field or deposit. Often these estimates are aggregated to a basin, region, and/or national level. The manner in which these probability distributions are aggregated can have a significant effect on the resulting uncertainty, given that dependency usually exists at a basin and higher levels. All aggregation procedures involve the specification of a dependency matrix, which is complicated by the lack of data and the skewness of the distributions. We illustrate the difficulty of assessing correlations from scatter plots of skewed distributions and examine aggregate estimates given assumptions about the form of the underlying distributions of resource estimates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. U.S. Geological Survey Geologic Carbon Dioxide Storage Resources Assessment Team (2013). National assessment of the geologic carbon dioxide storage resources—Results. U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1386.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Blondes, M. S., Schuenemeyer, J. H., Olea, R. A., & Drew, L. J. (2013). Aggregation of carbon dioxide sequestrations storage assessment units, stochastic rnvironmental research and risk assessment. DOI 10.1007/s00477-013-0718 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Higham, N. J. (2002). Computing the nearest correlation matrix–a problem from finance. IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis, 22(3), 329–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Frigessi, A., Løland, A., Pievatolo, A., & Ruggeri, F. (2010). Statistical rehabilitation of improper correlation matrices. Quantitative Finance, 11(7), 1081–1090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kaufman, G. M., & Schuenemeyer, J. H. (2012). Petroleum assessment via hierarchical modeling. AAPG Search and Discovery article 40558. Accessed December 7, 2010, from http://www.searchanddiscovery.com/documents/2010/40558kaufman/ndx_kaufman.pdf

  6. Embrechts, P., McNeil, A., & Straumann, D. (2002). Correlation and dependence in risk management: Properties and pitfalls. In M. A. H. Dempster (ed.), Risk management: Value at risk and beyond (pp. 176–223) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chen, Z., Osadetz, K. G., Dixon, J., & Dietrich, J. (2012). Using copulas for implementation of variable dependencies in petroleum resource assessment: Example from beaufort-mackenzie basin, Canada. AAPG Bulletin, 96(3): 439–457.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kendall, M. G., Stuart, A., & Ord, J. K. (1979). The Advanced Theory of Statistics (748 p.). New York: Griffin.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Thomopoulos, N. T., & Johnson, A. C. (2004). Some measures on the standard bivariate lognormal distribution. Boston: Decision Sciences Institute Proceedings.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kat, H. M. (2002). The dangers of using correlation to measure dependence. (pp. 2002–2023). Finance: ISMA Center Discussion Papers in.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was partly supported by the U.S. Geological Survey. Suggestions of Madalyn Blondes and Emil Attanasi are greatly appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John H. Schuenemeyer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Schuenemeyer, J.H., Olea, R.A. (2014). Distributional Assumptions and Parametric Uncertainties in the Aggregation of Geologic Resources. In: Pardo-Igúzquiza, E., Guardiola-Albert, C., Heredia, J., Moreno-Merino, L., Durán, J., Vargas-Guzmán, J. (eds) Mathematics of Planet Earth. Lecture Notes in Earth System Sciences. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32408-6_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics