Skip to main content

Continuous Improvement of Business Processes Realized by Services Based on Execution Measurement

  • Conference paper
Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering (ENASE 2011)

Abstract

Business Process Management (BPM) is being rapidly adopted by organizations wanting to focus on their business processes as key elements for controlling and improving the way they perform their business. The realization of business processes by services also helps in the improvement of their implementation, by decoupling the definition level from the technical one. In this article we present an approach to the continuous business process improvement based on execution measurement. It comprises an execution measurement model defining several measures for business process and service execution, and a continuous improvement process to guide the introduction of improvements. We have integrated several different approaches, techniques and methodologies in a single proposal to guide the improvement effort in an organization, providing support for business people from the definition to the analysis of the execution measures defined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Weske, M.: BPM Concepts, Languages, Architectures. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Weske, M.: Business Process Management: A Survey. In: van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Weske, M. (eds.) BPM 2003. LNCS, vol. 2678, pp. 1–12. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Smith, H., Fingar, P.: Business Process Management: The third wave, Meghan-Kieffer

    Google Scholar 

  4. OMG (2008a), BP Modeling Notation (BPMN) (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Delgado, A., Ruiz, F., García-Rodríguez de Guzmán, I., Piattini, M.: MINERVA: Model drIveN and sErvice oRiented Framework for the Continuous Business Process improVement and relAted Tools. In: Dan, A., Gittler, F., Toumani, F. (eds.) ICSOC/ServiceWave 2009. LNCS, vol. 6275, pp. 456–466. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Delgado, A., Ruiz, F., García-Rodríguez de Guzmán, I., Piattini, M.: A Model-driven and Service-oriented framework for BP improvement. Journal of Systems Integration (JSI) 1(3) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Papazoglou, M., Traverso, P., Dustdar, S., Leymann, F.: Service-Oriented Computing: State of the Art and Research Challenge. IEEE Computer Society (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mellor, S., Clark, A., Futagami, T.: Model Driven Development-Guest eds.int. IEEE Computer Society (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Delgado, A., Ruiz, F., García-Rodríguez de Guzmán, I., Piattini, M.: Towards an ontology for service oriented modeling supporting business processes. In: 4th. IC Research Challenges Inf. Sci. (RCIS 2010). IEEE (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Delgado, A., Ruiz, F., García-Rodríguez de Guzmán, I., Piattini, M.: Towards a Service-Oriented and Model-Driven framework with business processes as first-class citizens. In: 2nd IC on Business Process and Services Computing, BPSC 2009 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Delgado, A.: García-Rodríguez de Guzmán, I., Ruiz, F., Piattini, M.: From BPMN BP models to SoaML service models: a transformation-driven approach. In: 2nd Int. Conf. on Sw. Tech. Engineering, ICSTE 2010 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Delgado, A., García-Rodríguez de Guzmán, I., Ruiz, F., Piattini, M.: Tool support for Service Oriented development from Business Processes. In: 2nd Int. Work. Model-Driven Service Engineering, MOSE 2010 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pino, F.J., Hurtado Alegría, J.A., Vidal, J.C., García, F., Piattini, M.: A Process for Driving Process Improvement in VSEs. In: Wang, Q., Garousi, V., Madachy, R., Pfahl, D. (eds.) ICSP 2009. LNCS, vol. 5543, pp. 342–353. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Rolón, E., García, F., et al.: Evaluation Measures for Business Process Models. In: 21st Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC 2006) (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cardoso, J.: Process control-flow complexity metric: An empirical validation. In: IEEE International Conference on Services Computing, SCC 2006 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mendling, J.: Metrics for Process Models: Empirical Foundations of Verification, Error Prediction, and Guidelines for Correctness. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sánchez González, L., García, F., et al.: Assessment and Prediction of Business Process Model Quality. In: 18th Int. Conf. Cooperative Inf. Systems, CoopIS 2010 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Object Management Group (OMG), Query/Views/Transformations (QVT) (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Object Management Group (OMG), Soa Modeling Language (SoaML), beta 2 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  20. van der Aalst, W.M.P., Reijers, H.A., Medeiros, A.: Business Process Mining: an Industrial Application. Information Systems 32(5) (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  21. ProM, Process Mining Group, Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  22. Reijers, H.A.: Design and Control of Workflow Processes. LNCS, vol. 2617. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Maruster, L., van Beest, N.: Redesigning business processes: a methodology based on simulation and process mining techniques. Knowl. Inf. Syst. Journal (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Netjes, M.: Process Improvement: The creation and Evaluation of Process Alternatives. Eindhoven UT (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Object Management Group (OMG), BP Maturity Model (BPMM), v.1.0 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sánchez, G.L., Delgado, A., Ruiz, F., García, F., Piattini, M.: Measurement and Maturity of BP. In: Cardoso, J., van der Aalst, W. (eds.) Handbook of Research on BP Modeling. Inf. Science Ref., IGI Global (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Brand, N., Van der Kolk, H.: Workflow Analysis and Design (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Basili, V.R.: Software Modeling and Measurement: The GQM Paradigm, CS-TR-2956, University of Maryland (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  29. García, F., et al.: Towards a Consistent Terminology for Software Measurement. Inf. and SW Tech. 48 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Mora, B., García, F., Ruiz, F., Piattini, M.: SMML: Software Measurement Modeling Language. In: 8th Int. Work. Domain-Specific Modeling, OOPSLA 2008 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Laguna, M., Marklund, J.: BP Modeling, Simulation and Design. Prentice Hall (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  32. zur Muehlen, M.: Workflow-based Process Controlling, Foundation, Design, and Application of Workflow-driven Process IS. Logos Verlag (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Poppendieck, M.: Principles of Lean Thinking, Poppendieck. LLC (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hicks, B.J.: Lean information management: Understanding and eliminating waste. Int. Journal of Information Management (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Jimmerson, C., Weber, D., Sobek, D.: Reducing waste and errors: Piloting Lean Principles at Intermountain Healthcare. Journal Quality & Patient Safety (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Wetzstein, B., Karastoyanova, D., Leyman, F.: Towards Management of SLA-Aware BP Based on Key Performance Indicators. In: 9th Work. BP Modeling, Development and Support, BPMDS 2008 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Cardoso, J., Sheth, A., Miller, J.: Workflow quality of service. In: Int. Conf. on Enterprise Integ. and Mod. Tech., Int. Enterprise Mod. Conf, ICEIMT/IEM 2002 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  38. O’Brien, L., Bass, L., Merson, P.: Quality Attrs. and SOA, CMU/SEI-20055-TN-014. SEI (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Clements, P., Kazman, R., Klein, M.: Evaluating SW Archs: Methods and Case Studies. Addison Wesley (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Bass, L., Clements, P., Kazman, R.: Software Architecture in Practice. Addison Wesley (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Barbacci, M., Klein, M., et al.: Quality Atributtes, CMU/SEI-95-TR-021, SEI (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  42. ARIS, IDS Scheer, Software AG, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P.: The balanced Scorecard Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review 10(1) (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Buglione, L., Abran, A.: Balance Scorecards and GQM: what are the differences? In: FESMA-AEMES Software Measurement Conference (2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Delgado, A., Weber, B., Ruiz, F., de Guzmán, I.GR., Piattini, M. (2013). Continuous Improvement of Business Processes Realized by Services Based on Execution Measurement. In: Maciaszek, L.A., Zhang, K. (eds) Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering. ENASE 2011. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 275. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32341-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32341-6_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-32340-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-32341-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics