Skip to main content

Pilot Curriculum in China: The Practice of Promoting the Quality of Higher Education

  • Chapter
Reshaping Learning

Part of the book series: New Frontiers of Educational Research ((NFER))

  • 2213 Accesses

Abstract

The issue of quality has drawn great attention of the nations around the world in the process of the popularization of higher education. China has launched the construction and assessment of National Pilot Curriculum (NPC) as one of the measures to solve the quality issue of higher education. This chapter first introduces the initiative background of the construction of NPC in China and analyzes the challenges of higher education in the process of popularization in China. Then it presents the quality assessment framework to identify a curriculum as NPC, and summarizes the supporting role of the construction of NPC in promoting the quality of higher education in China. In order to further reveal the impact of the construction of NPC on the quality of Chinese higher education, this chapter also briefly reports two studies that adopt content analysis and survey investigation separately to study the changes of the instructional methods in universities and the ways of resource sharing in the construction of NPC. It can be concluded that the construction of NPC is an innovative movement implemented in China to solve the quality issue of higher education, which has certain values for reference to the policy efforts, faculty development activities in universities, open courseware movement, and other related work in the perspective of quality assurance system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    90-Day Work Group Report of Course Quality Assurance Group, University of Alaska Steering Board, [EB/OL] www.alaska.edu, March 28–29, 2005.

  2. 2.

    Guidelines for Course Quality Assurance, Academic Quality Officer of QUT, [EB/OL] www.appu.qut.edu.au, Last Updated: March 2007.

  3. 3.

    The assessment index system of pilot curriculum and exquisite curricula network education in higher vocational and professional college is enacted separately. National quality course evaluation index of network education (2010) http://www.cwnu.edu.cn/jpkc/15.doc, national quality course evaluation index of higher vocational education (2010) http://www.zztrc.edu.cn/kyws/wenzhang/Upfiles/20103594013720.doc.

  4. 4.

    The sub-project of national pilot curriculum “national pilot curriculum shared service and sustainable development” concluding report.

  5. 5.

    Chief teachers in pilot curriculum.

References

  • Aihua W, Yongsong Z, Jinjiang C (2008) Thinking about promoting national pilot curriculum construction. China Edu Info 13:4–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Beijing (2005) http://jpkc.bjedu.cn/aaic/repport/Executive_Summary.pdf

  • Bennett S, Maton K, Kervin L (2008) The digital natives debate: a critical review of the evidence. British J Edu Tech 5:775–786

    Google Scholar 

  • Bingde L (1991) Pedagogy. People Education Press, vol 1, p 159

    Google Scholar 

  • China Education (2011) version 2, 6 July

    Google Scholar 

  • Connelly FM, Lantz O (1985) Definition of curriculum. In: Husén T, Neville Postlethwaite T (eds) The international encyclopedia of education. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 1160–1163

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang R, Jiang X, Zhang J (2007) Innovation and change: the core value of education informatization, Science Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Kedong L (2003) researching method of educational technology. Beijing Normal University Press, Beijing, vol 4, p 281

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellaghan T, Stufflebeam DL (2003) International handbook of educational evaluation. Kluwer Academic publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanfang Z, Jin F, Ronghuai H (2010) The survey and analysis of national pilot curriculum development and sharing demand, open education research, vol 10(3), pp 88–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Li H (2008) Several hot issues in the development of information technology of higher education. E-education Res 5:19–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu D, Xu W (2011) The study about promotion and using pattern of pilot curriculum. Jiangsu Higher Educ 2:89–90

    Google Scholar 

  • MIT (2005) http://ocw.mit.edu/ans7870/global/05_Eval_Summary.pdf

  • MIT (2009) http://ocw.mit.edu/ans7870/global/09_Eval_Summary.pdf

  • Prensky M, Zhibiao H, Kai W (2009) Digital natives digital immigrants. J Distance Edu 2:48–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Qin L (2011) Study about national pilot curriculum promotion mode. China Educ Technol 266(3):50–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronghuai H, Lanfang Z, Lanqin Z (2010) The research of the undergraduate’s teaching method reform trend in China. E-Education Res 5:84–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi X, Xue W (2011) Problems and countermeasures about pilot curriculum resources sharing. China’s High Res 1:90–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Trow M (1972) The expansion and transformation of higher education, international review of education, no 1, pp 61–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y (2002) The popularization of high education—the bottleneck and strategic choice faced by developing countries in Asia-Pacific region, southeast education

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Y (2011) Teaching research status analysis in pilot curriculum construction. PhD thesis, Beijing Normal University, vol 12, p 93

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeng L, Fang J, Huang R (2010) The survey and analysis of national pilot curriculum development and sharing demand. Open Educ Res 10(3):88–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y (2007) The quality and characteristics of university programs in China—the characteristics of “national pilot curriculum” and its computer-aided analysis. PhD thesis, Beijing normal university, vol 6

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao J (1998) The outlook and framework of higher education in 21st century—the overview of 98 world conference on higher education. Shanghai Higher Educ Res 12:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhenzhong D (2006) Higher education informatization research at home and abroad. Vocat Educ Explor Res 4:63–65

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yanyan Li .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

1.1 Assessment Indicators of National Pilot Curriculum (For Undergraduates, 2010)

1.1.1 Description of Assessment Indicators

  1. (1)

    The assessment indicators are formulated according to the spirit of On the Implementation of Instructional Quality and Instructional Reform Project for Undergraduates released by the Ministry of Education and the Ministry of Finance (JG[2007]No.1), On Further Deepening Instructional Reform for Undergraduates to Improve Overall Instructional Quality released by the Ministry of Education (JG[2007]No.2) and the Announcement of Initiating the Construction of Pilot Curriculum in Project of Instructional Quality of Universities and Instructional Reform release by the Ministry of Education (JG[2003]No.3), we established the assessment indicators.

  2. (2)

    Pilot curriculum refers to the excellent curriculum with features and first-class instructional level. The construction of pilot curriculum has to embody modern educational philosophy in accordance with talent fostering goals, meets the universal law of scientific nature, advancement and education and instruction, and also has distinct features as well as properly utilizing modern educational technology and methods with obvious effectiveness as a demonstration and radiation for popularization.

  3. (3)

    The assessment of pilot curriculum should embody the direction of educational and instructional reform, guide the teachers to innovate the methods of education and instruction, ensure students’ benefit and the improvement of instructional quality and pay attention to the following questions: ① The contents should balance the relationship between the classic and the modern and that between theory and practice, attach importance to cultivating students’ practical and innovative capability in the practical instruction. ② The infrastructure should pay attention to the construction and improvement of high-quality instructional resources and strengthen the assistant instructional function of curriculum websites. ③ The pedagogy should flexibly utilize various instructional methods to arouse the students’ enthusiasm in teaching and to promote the development of their learning capability. It should coordinate the application of traditional instructional approaches and modern educational technology for better integration with the curriculum. ④ The construction of faculty should pay attention to the leading and demonstrative role of the teachers in charge of pilot curriculum so as to promote the structural perfection and the improvement of the faculty.

  4. (4)

    The criteria combine qualitative assessment with quantitative assessment to improve the reliability and comparability of assessment results. The assessment indicators are divided into two parts, which are comprehensive assessment and feature as well as policy support and radiation sharing. In the centesimal grade, the comprehensive assessment accounts for 80 % and the feature, policy support and radiation sharing accounts for 20 %.

  5. (5)

    Calculation formula of total score: M = ∑KiMi, Ki is the coefficient of scoring class, the coefficients of A, B, C, D and E are 1.0, 0.8, 0.6, 0.4 and 0.2 respectively, and Mi refers to the scores of each Class-B indicator.

Class-A indicators

Class-B indicator

Main assessment points

Assessment standards

Score (Mi) (%)

Scoring class (Ki)

A

B

C

D

E

1.0

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

Faculty (20 %)

1-1 Chief teachers

The teaching style, academic level and instructional level of the teachers

Chief teachers have good morality of teachers, with high academic attainments, excellent instructional capability, rich instructional experience and distinctive instructional features, who are in charge of teaching this curriculum for no less than 2 cycles in the recent 3 years

6

     

1-2 Team of teachers

Knowledge structure, age structure, personnel allocation and the cultivation of young teacher

The teachers in the team have strong responsibility, good spirit of teamwork and collaboration, with reasonable knowledge structure, age structure and academic geographical structure. The tutors are allocated according to the requirement of the curriculum. The training plan for young teachers is scientific and rational with practical effectiveness. The experts with professional background should be encouraged to participate in the team

6

     

1-3 Instructional reform and research

Instructional and research activities and instructional outcomes

Active instructional ideas and innovative instructional reform are required. Instructional research activities promote the instructional reform with significant effectiveness, such as the instructional achievements, planned teaching materials or instructional reform projects at or above the level of province or ministry. Academic papers of instructional research of high quality are published.

     

Content (20 %)

2-1 Curriculum Content[1]

Design of curriculum content

The design of curriculum content should embody modern educational philosophy according to the objectives of talent training, in accordance with scientific nature, advancement and the law of education and instruction.

10 

     

The relationship of classical and modern contents of theoretical curriculum is properly dealt with. The theoretical contents are fundamental, investigative and pilot, which can bring the latest development outcomes and instructional reform and research outcomes of the disciplines to the instruction

The relationship of technology, comprehensiveness and exploratory of experimental content (including independent experimental content) is properly treated, which can effectively develop the practice capability and innovative capability of the students

2-2 Organization of content

Organization and arrangement of content

Put the theory into practice with the curricular and extracurricular combination, integrate knowledge imparting and capability fostering to quality education and encourage related internship, social investigations or other practical activities with remarkable results

10

     

Infrastructure (20 %)

3-1 Teaching materials

The construction of teaching materials and relevant materials

Select excellent materials (including national pilot teaching materials and those in the national plan, foreign original materials of high level or those composed by the faculty themselves). Have rich relevant materials such as courseware, case studies, and exercises and so on, and provide effective literature and references for the inquiry learning and self-learning of students. The experimental teaching materials are complete to meet the requirements of instruction

10

     

3-2 Practice teaching conditions

The advancement and openness of practice teaching environment

Practice teaching conditions can satisfy the requirements of the instruction. Open instruction is allowed with significant effectiveness (curriculum of science and engineering can provide experiments of high level for choice)

3-3 Web-based teaching conditions

Web-based instructional resources and hardware environment

The hardware environment of the campus network is good enough to run the websites of curriculum, with rich instructional resources, with complete functions of assisting instruction and learning for effective sharing

10

     

Pedagogy (20 %)

4-1 Instructional design

Instructional philosophy and instructional design

Emphasize inquiry learning and research learning, reflecting the student-centered and teacher-mentored educational philosophy. Make reasonable instructional design according to the curriculum content and students’ characteristics (including teaching methods, teaching means, assessment methods, etc.)

     

4-2 Teaching methods

The application of various teaching methods and their effectiveness

Emphasize pedagogy reform, flexibly use a variety of appropriate teaching methods to effectively motivate the learning enthusiasm of students and enhance the development of their learning capability

12 

     

4-3b Teaching means

The application of information technology

Make appropriate and full use of modern educational technology to carry out instructional activities with visible effectiveness in the aspects of stimulating students’ interests in learning and improving instructional effects

Effectiveness (20 %)

5-1 Peer review

The assessment of external experts and internal supervisor group and the fame

The evidence materials are authentic and reliable with excellent assessment and good reputation

     

5-2 Students’ review

Students’ assessment and suggestions

The original materials of students’ assessment are authentic and reliable with excellent results. The curriculum should have supporting materials of the students’ assessment data in recent three years provided by the instructional administrative office of universities

     

5-3 Instructional video review

Video of classroom teaching

Effectively use a variety of instructional media, give thorough interpretation of the issues with enthusiasm and appeal with outstanding focuses, clear thinking, mature contents and numerous information. The contents taught in the classroom can reflect or link to the new ideas, new concepts and new achievements of the development of the disciplines, which can inspire the thinking, association and innovative thinking of students

8

     

Features, policy support and radiation sharing

Experts give scores in accordance with the features and innovation written in the application form of National Pilot Curriculum in 2010

40 

     

Effective policy and measurements for supporting and encouraging the construction of pilot curriculum in the applied universities

30

     

Strong radiation-sharing measurements with promising future construction plan

30 

     
  1. 1According to the types of curriculum, give scores in the part of “content design” in reference to corresponding standards

Class-A indicators

Class-B indicators

Score (%)

Proportion of total score

Class-B indicators

Class-A indicators

Faculty 20 %

1-1 Chief teachers

6

  

1-2 Team of teachers

6

  

1-3 Teaching reform and research

8

  

Content 20 %

2-1 Course content

10

  

2-2 Organization and arrangement of content

10

  

Infrastructure 20 %

3-1 Teaching materials

10

  

3-2 Practice-teaching conditions

 

3-3 Web-based teaching conditions

10

  

Pedagogy 20 %

4-1 Instructional design

8

  

4-2 Teaching methods

12

  

4-3 Teaching means

 

Effectiveness 20 %

5-1 Peer review

4

  

5-2 Student review

8

  

5-3 Instructional video review

8

  

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Li, Y., Zhou, Y., Zeng, L. (2013). Pilot Curriculum in China: The Practice of Promoting the Quality of Higher Education. In: Huang, R., Kinshuk, Spector, J.M. (eds) Reshaping Learning. New Frontiers of Educational Research. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32301-0_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics