Skip to main content

On Goodness of Models and Instantiations in Design Research: Some Potential Perspectives

  • Conference paper
  • 936 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 124))

Abstract

In this paper, we discuss how to evaluate (models and instantiations), which criteria for goodness that are applicable within different research approaches. In the prevalent (positivist) research we are accustomed to ask whether a certain model truthfully describes an object under study, and how useful is a new IT artifact. But researchers can also take other perspectives than the prevalent one on the world, e.g., interpretive or critical. In addition to models, researchers can also evaluate a wider information system than the new IT artifact only. We restrict our consideration into design research, the models developed and the outcomes constructed. We must model the old system in the problem space and the new system in the solution space. We therefore collect and analyze various guidelines for modeling from different perspectives (positivist, interpretive and critical). Concerning design outcomes we pay attention to different stake holder groups and their different evaluation criteria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   72.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bourdieu, P.: Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bourdieu, P.: The Logic of Practice. Stanford University Press, Stanford (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bourdieu, P.: Concluding Remarks: For a Sociogenetic Understanding of Intellectual Works. In: Calhoun, C., LiPuma, E., Postone, M. (eds.) Bourdieu: Critical Perspectives, pp. 263–275. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Burton-Jones, A., McLean, E.R., Monod, E.: On approaches to building theories: Process, variance and systems. Working paper, Sauder School of Business, UBC (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, W.S., Hirschheim, R.: A paradigmatic and methodological examination of information systems research from 1991 to 2001. Information Systems Journal 14, 197–235 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chua, C.E.H., Khoo, H.M., Straub, D.W., Kadiyala, S.: The evolution of e-Commerce research: A stakeholder perspective. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research 6, 262–281 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chua, W.F.: Radical developments in accounting thought. The Accounting Review LXI, 601–632 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Christiaanse, E., Venkatraman, N.: Beyond SABRE: An empirical test of expertise exploitation in electronic channels. MIS Quarterly 26, 15–38 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Constantinides, P., Chiasson, M.W., Introna, L.D.: The ends of Information Systems research: A pragmatic framework. MIS Quarterly 36, 1–19 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Foucault, M.: The Order of Things, Tavistock, London (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Foucault, M.: The Archaeology of Knowledge, Tavistock, London (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Foucault, M.: Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Vintage Books, New York (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Foucault, M.: Madness and Civilization: A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason. Routledge, London (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Habermas, J.: Knowledge and Human Interests. Heinemann, London (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Habermas, J.: The Theory of Communicative Action. Beacon Press, Boston (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Habermas, J.: On the Logic of the Social Sciences. MIT Press, Cambridge (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Habermas, J.: Justification and Application: Remarks on Discourse Ethics. Polity Press, Cambridge (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Habermas, J., Lenhardt, C., Nicholsen, S.W.: Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. MIT Press, Boston (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Henderson, J.C., Venkatraman, N.: Strategic alignment: Leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM Systems Journal 32, 4–16 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly 28, 75–105 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Iivari, J.: A paradigmatic analysis of contemporary schools of IS development. European Journal of Information Systems 1, 249–272 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Iivari, J.: A paradigmatic analysis of Information Systems as a design science. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 19, 39–64 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Illeris, K.: A model of learning in working life. The Journal of Workplace Learning 16, 431–441 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Iveroth, E.: Inside Ericsson: A framework for the practice of leading global IT-enabled change. California Management Review 53, 136–153 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Järvinen, P.: On research methods, Opinpajan kirja, Tampere (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Järvinen, P.: On reviewing results of design research. In: ECIS 2007 Proceedings. Paper 72 (2007), http://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2007/72/

  27. Klein, H.K., Myers, M.D.: A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quarterly 23, 67–94 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Korpelainen, E., Vartiainen, M., Kira, M.: Self-determined adoption of an ICT system in a work organization. The Journal of Organizational and End User Computing 20, 51–69 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. March, S.T., Smith, G.F.: Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision Support Systems 15, 251–266 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Miller, G.A.: The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review 63, 81–97 (1956)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mumford, E.: The story of socio-technical design: Reflections on its successes, failures and potential. Information Systems Journal 16, 317–342 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Myers, M.D., Klein, H.K.: A Set of principles for conducting critical research in Information Systems. MIS Quarterly 35, 17–36 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Nunnally, J.C.: Psychometric Theory, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Orlikowski, W.J., Baroudi, J.J.: Studying information technology in organizations: Research approaches and assumptions. Information Systems Research 2(1), 1–28 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Reeves, C.A., Bednar, D.A.: Defining quality: Alternatives and implications. Academy of Management Review 19, 419–445 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Richardson, H., Robinson, B.: The mysterious case of the missing paradigm: A review of critical information systems research 1991-2001. Information Systems Journal 17, 251–270 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Straub, D., Boudreau, M.-C., Gefen, D.: Validation guidelines for IS positivist research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 13, 380–427 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  38. van Aken, J.E.: Management research based on the paradigm of the design sciences: The quest for field-tested and grounded technological rules. Journal of Management Studies 41, 219–246 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. van der Heijden, H.: User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quarterly 28, 695–704 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Virkkunen, H.: Initial costs for product types and lots in manufacturing as a cause for decreasing unit costs and their treatment in cost accounting, Summary (Teollisuuden kertakustannukset - niiden degressio sekä käsittely kustannus-laskennassa) Helsinki research institute for business economics No 13 (Liike-taloustieteellisen Tutkimuslaitoksen julkaisuja 13) Helsinki (1951)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Järvinen, P. (2012). On Goodness of Models and Instantiations in Design Research: Some Potential Perspectives. In: Keller, C., Wiberg, M., Ågerfalk, P.J., Eriksson Lundström, J.S.Z. (eds) Nordic Contributions in IS Research. SCIS 2012. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 124. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32270-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32270-9_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-32269-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-32270-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics