Skip to main content

An Intuitionistic Investigation of Prerequisite-Effect Structure

  • Conference paper
  • 532 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7258))

Abstract

This paper studies the prerequisite-effect structures in legal documents from a logical viewpoint. First, we distinguish a written prerequisite-effect structure in legal documents and an application-instance of the written structure to a particular case, and formalize the latter as \(\leadsto\). Second, we specify its semantics as ‘immediately after’ on intuitionistic Kripke model. Third, we establish semantic properties of \(\leadsto\) including the undefinability of \(\leadsto\) in intuitionistic logic, and provide a cut-free and complete labelled sequent calculus with the intuitionistic logic with \(\leadsto\). Finally, we illustrate a formal representation of Articles 7 and 9 of Japanese Income Tax Act with the help of \(\leadsto\).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Governatori, G., Rotolo, A., Sartor, G.: Temporalised normative positions in defeasible logic. In: Gardner, A. (ed.) Procedings of the 10th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 25–34. ACM Press (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gordon, T.F., Governatori, G., Rotolo, A.: Rules and Norms: Requirements for Rule Interchange Languages in the Legal Domain. In: Governatori, G., Hall, J., Paschke, A. (eds.) RuleML 2009. LNCS, vol. 5858, pp. 282–296. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Satoh, K., Asai, K., Kogawa, T., Kubota, M., Nakamura, M., Nishigai, Y., Shirakawa, K., Takano, C.: PROLEG: An Implementation of the Presupposed Ultimate Fact Theory of Japanese Civil Code by PROLOG Technology. In: Onoda, T., Bekki, D., McCready, E. (eds.) JSAI-isAI 2010. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6797, pp. 153–164. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hagiwara, S.: Multiple relations in legal documents based on intuitionistic logic. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Juris-informatics (JURISIN 2010), pp. 41–50 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sano, K., Hagiwara, S., Tojo, S.: Prerequisite-effect structure on intuitionistic kripke model. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Juris-informatics (JURISIN 2011), pp. 50–61 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Van Dalen, D.: Logic and Structure. Springer (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Prior, A.N.: Past, Present and Future. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1967)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Kashima, R.: Sequent calculi of non-classical logics - Proofs of completeness theorems by sequent calculi. In: Proceedings of Mathematical Society of Japan Annual Colloquium of Foundations of Mathematics, pp. 49–67 (1999) (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ishigaki, R., Kikuchi, K.: Tree-Sequent Methods for Subintuitionistic Predicate Logics. In: Olivetti, N. (ed.) TABLEAUX 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4548, pp. 149–164. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Sano, K.: Sound and Complete Tree-Sequent Calculus for Inquisitive Logic. In: Ono, H., Kanazawa, M., de Queiroz, R. (eds.) WoLLIC 2009. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5514, pp. 365–378. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Reiter, R.: A logic for default reasoning. Artificial Intelligence 13, 81–132 (1980)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Governatori, G., Rotolo, A.: Changing legal systems: legal abrogations and annulments in defeasible logic. Logic Journal of the IGPL 18(1), 157–194 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Batens, D.: A universal logic approach to adaptive logics. Logica Universalis 1(1), 221–242 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Haeusler, E.H., De Paiva, V., Rademaker, A.: Intuitionistic logic and legal ontologies. In: Winkels, R.G. (ed.) Legal Knowledge and Information Systems - JURIX 2010: The Twenty-Third Annual Conference. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 223, pp. 155–158 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gabbay, D.M., Kurucz, A., Wolter, F., Zakharyaschev, M.: Many-Dimensional Modal Logics: Theory and Applications. Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics. Elsevier, North-Holland (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sano, K., Hagiwara, S., Tojo, S. (2012). An Intuitionistic Investigation of Prerequisite-Effect Structure. In: Okumura, M., Bekki, D., Satoh, K. (eds) New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence. JSAI-isAI 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7258. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32090-3_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32090-3_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-32089-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-32090-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics