Advertisement

Deliberation Process Support System for Citizen Judge Trial Based on Structure of Factors

  • Takanori Sato
  • Shogo Okada
  • Katsumi Nitta
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7258)

Abstract

In 2009, the Japanese government adopted the citizen judge system. In this system, three professional judges and six citizen judges listen to the arguments between the prosecutor and the attorney, and decide the judgment through the discussion in deliberation. However the presiding judges have not been trained for moderation sufficiently, so that their skills of moderation affect the performance and quality of the discussion. Therefore, in this paper, we propose a deliberation process support system. The system assists the presiding judge to facilitate the deliberation by some functions. First it visualizes an argument structure graph, representing summary of the arguments between the prosecutor and the attorney. Next it recommends topics which need argument and their order. We propose a novel algorithm to select these topics based on preliminary research. Finally it also recommends speakers who did not have the opportunity to make remarks.

Keywords

Argument Visualization Argumentation Moderator Support 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Nohara, K., Morimoto, I., Mishima, S., Takeuchi, K.: Expansion of Deliberation Design Theory in the Citizen Judge System (Final 3.) Towards Realization of Deliberation Based on Closing Argument Analysis - Concrete Methods and Challenges and Prospects in Designing Deliberation. Horitsujiho 81(10), 84–95 (2009) (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hotta, S.: Linguistic Theories in Legal Settings. Hituzi Syobo (2010) (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Reed, C., Rowe, G.: Araucaria: Software for argument analysis, diagramming and representation. International Journal on Artificial Intelligence Tools 13(4), 961–979 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Loukis, E., Xenakis, A., Tseperli, N.: Using Argument Visualization to Enhance e-Participation in the Legislation Formation Process. In: Macintosh, A., Tambouris, E. (eds.) ePart 2009. LNCS, vol. 5694, pp. 125–138. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Aanzai, K., Nitta, K.: Analyzing system of conference record of citizen judge trial based on annotation. In: Proceedings of the SIG-KBS Conference, vol. 90, pp. 31–36. Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Aleven, V., Ashley, K.D.: Teaching CaseBased Argumentation Through a Model and Examples: Empirical Evaluation of an Intelligent Learning Environment. In: Proceedings of AIED 1997 World Conference, pp. 87–94. IOS Press (1997)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Heer, J., Card, S.K., Landay, J.A.: Prefuse: A Toolkit for Interactive Information Visualization. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2005, pp. 421–430. ACM, New York (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Takanori Sato
    • 1
  • Shogo Okada
    • 1
  • Katsumi Nitta
    • 1
  1. 1.Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Science and EngineeringTokyo Institute of TechnologyJapan

Personalised recommendations