Advertisement

Plural Quantifications and Generalized Quantifiers

  • Byeong-Uk Yi
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7395)

Abstract

This paper discusses two important results about expressive limitations of elementary languages due to David Kaplan, and clarifies how they relate to the expressive power of plural constructions of natural languages. Kaplan proved that such plural quantifications as the following cannot be paraphrased into elementary languages:

Most things are funny. (1)

Some critics admire only one another. (2)

The proof that (1) cannot be paraphrased into elementary languages is often taken to support the generalized quantifier approach to natural languages, and the proof that (2) cannot be so paraphrased is usually taken to mean that (2) is a second-order sentence. The paper presents an alternative interpretation: Kaplan’s results provide important steps toward clarifying the expressive power of plural constructions of natural languages vis-à-vis their singular cousins. In doing so, the paper compares and contrasts (regimented) plural languages with generalized quantifier languages, and plural logic with second-order logic.

Keywords

semantics natural language plural construction plural logic Geach-Kaplan sentence generalized quantifier theory Rescher quantifier plural quantifier the semantics of ‘most’ 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Almog, J.: The complexity of marketplace logic. Linguistics and Philosophy 20, 545–569 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barwise, J., Cooper, R.: Generalized quantifiers and natural language. Linguistics and Philosophy 4, 159–219 (1981)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boolos, G.: To be is to be a value of a variable (or to be some values of some variables). Journal of Philosophy 81, 430–449 (1984)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ebbinghaus, H.-D., Flum, J.: Finite Model Theory, 2nd revised edn. Springer, Berlin (1999)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Fagin, R.: Finite-model theory – a personal perspective. Theoretical Computer Science 116, 3–31 (1993)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kaplan, D.: Rescher’s plurality-quantification (Abstract). Journal of Symbolic Logic 31, 153–154 (1966)Google Scholar
  7. Kaplan, D.: Generalized plurality quantification (Abstract). Journal of Symbolic Logic 31, 154–155 (1966)Google Scholar
  8. Keenan, E.L., Stavi, J.: A semantic characterization of natural language determiners. Linguistics and Philosophy 9, 253–326 (1986)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. McKay, T.: Plural Predication. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mostowski, A.: On a generalization of quantifiers. Fundamenta Mathematicae 44, 12–36 (1957)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. Quine, W.V.: Methods of Logic, 3rd edn. London, RKP (1974)Google Scholar
  12. Rescher, N.: Plurality-quantification (Abstract). Journal of Symbolic Logic 27, 373–374 (1962)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. Rescher, N.: Plurality quantification revisited. Philosophical Inquiry 26, 1–6 (2004)Google Scholar
  14. Väänänen, J.: A Short Course on Finite Model Theory. Manuscript Based on Lectures in 1993-1994 (1994), http://www.math.helsinki.fi/logic/people/jouko.vaananen/shortcourse.pdf
  15. Westerståhl, D.: Logical constants in quantifier languages. Linguistics and Philosophy 8, 387–413 (1985)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Westerståhl, D.: Quantifiers in formal and natural languages. In: Gabbay, D., Guethner, F. (eds.) The Handbook of Philosophical Logic, vol. IV, pp. 1–131. Reidel, Dordrecht (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Yi, B.-U.: Is two a property? Journal of Philosophy 95, 163–190 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Yi, B.-U.: Understanding the Many. Routledge, New York & London (2002)Google Scholar
  19. Yi, B.-U.: The logic and meaning of plurals. Part I. Journal of Philosophical Logic 34, 459–506 (2005)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Yi, B.-U.: The logic and meaning of plurals. Part II. Journal of Philosophical Logic 35, 239–288 (2006)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Yi, B.-U.: Is logic axiomatizable? unpublished manuscriptGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Byeong-Uk Yi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations