Skip to main content

GDP Estimates for Regions Within the Province of Quebec: The Changing Geography of Economic Activity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Defining the Spatial Scale in Modern Regional Analysis

Part of the book series: Advances in Spatial Science ((ADVSPATIAL))

  • 1107 Accesses

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is twofold. First, we report on a method developed at the Institut de la Statistique du Québec (ISQ) to estimate the GDP of regions within the Province of Quebec. And, second, we analyse the estimates to examine the recent evolution of the geographical pattern of economic activity in Quebec.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Technically, Census Metropolitan Areas (CMAs), following the statistical system in Canada. It is understood that, throughout this text, metropolitan areas are Census Metropolitan Areas. We shall use the full expression “Census Metropolitan Areas” when discussing the definition of MA boundaries by Statistics Canada.

  2. 2.

    Those estimates are published in the spring issue of the Conference Board’s quarterly Metropolitan Outlook/Note de conjoncturemetropolitaine.

  3. 3.

    Statistics Canada defines a minimum threshold below which no information may be disseminated (Statistics Canada 2011, 71-543-G, p 31, “Release criteria”). For Quebec, that threshold is 1,500. It follows that for small CMAs, some industries “disappear” at times, only to reappear later on, just because the number of employees has temporarily fallen below the confidentiality threshold. This limits the level of detail at which the method is applicable and occasionally forces to make adjustments.

  4. 4.

    The BEA method for computing Gross State Products (GSP), like Statistics Canada’s method for provincial GDP, is a mixed, bottom-up/top-down method which makes use of fiscal and administrative data.

  5. 5.

    Panek et al. 2007. The 2001–2009 estimates of GDP by metropolitan area in current and real (chained) dollars are available from the Regional Economic Accounts page of the BEA Web site at http://www.bea.gov/regional/index.htm.

  6. 6.

    A brief description of the INSEE method can be found at http://www.insee.fr/fr/themes/detail.asp?reg_id=99%26ref_id=pib-va-reg

  7. 7.

    Except for the three regional conferences of the Nord-du-Québec administrative region, whose economic and demographic weight is too small to subdivide the region.

  8. 8.

    For an even more detailed description, see Lemelin and Mainguy (2005, 2009a).

  9. 9.

    Fiscal data are compiled by Revenu Québec, and passed on to the Institut de la statistique du Québec in an aggregated form that complies with the confidentiality rules which protect personal information.

  10. 10.

    R1 slips are issued by employers to employees, with a copy forwarded to Revenu Québec. They contain information on the worker’s labour income to be entered in his/her income declaration for income tax purposes.

  11. 11.

    Recall that, since 2001, Revenu Québec classifies NIUB data according to the NAICS, so that this conversion is now only necessary for fiscal data on salaries.

  12. 12.

    For narrow ideological reasons, the governing Conservative Party of Canada has decided to make the long census questionnaire optional, beginning with the 2011 census. This was done against the advice of Statistics Canada, and in spite of widespread protest from numerous organizations across the country who need reliable data, including Provincial and local administrations. Statistics Canada will attempt to maintain the validity of the census, by distributing the long questionnaire to 40 % of the population, rather than 20 %. But it is doubtful that this will be successful in eliminating self-selection biases and ensuring an adequate representation of all categories of persons.

  13. 13.

    For further details, see Annex 3 in Lemelin and Mainguy (2009a).

  14. 14.

    OOS therefore includes (Statistics Canada 13-213-PPB): Interest and miscellaneous investment income; inventory valuation adjustment; indirect taxes on production, net of subsidies on production (taxes and subsidies on production are not to be confused with taxes and subsidies on products: the latter are not taken into account in the calculation of GDP at basic prices); and, finally, capital consumption allowances (or depreciation).

  15. 15.

    Immobilisations et réparations des secteursprivé et public, par région administrative, Québec, years 1997 and following, Institut de la statistique du Québec, Direction des statistiques-économiques et du développement durable. Source: Statistics Canada, Investment and Capital Stock Division. Compilation: Institut de la statistique du Québec. These data may be downloaded from the Banque de données des statistiquesofficiellessur le Québec (BDSO): http://www.bdso.gouv.qc.ca/.

  16. 16.

    More information on the Annual Survey of Manufactures and Logging at: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/cgi-bin/imdb/p2SV_f.pl?Function=getSurvey%26SDDS=2103%26lang=en%26db=imdb%26adm=8%26dis=2

  17. 17.

    Six of the 11 study regions in Polèse and Shearmur (2002) are in Quebec: Abitibi-Témiscamingue, Côte-Nord, Gaspésie, Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean, and two subdivisions of the Bas-Saint-Laurent administrative region.

  18. 18.

    Such is the case, for example, of the non-metropolitan area around the Saguenay MA, most of which could be attributed to the North peripheral region.

  19. 19.

    It is readily recognized that, to compare the closeness of relationships, given that the correlation coefficient is a measure of linear dependence, it would be mathematically more correct to take the logarithmic transform of Eq. 6.3 and compute correlations between the logarithm of the left-hand side variable and the logarithms of each of the two right-hand side variables. But that would make the exposition unnecessarily technical. Given the Maclaurin series ln(1 + z) = z − z 2/2 + z 3/3–z 4/4 + …, we consider [(x t /x 0) − 1] to be a first order Taylor approximation of ln(x t /x 0) when x t is close to x 0, so the more correct mathematical approach would lead to the same observations.

  20. 20.

    What we call the panel correlation coefficient here is calculated for the panel of 16 regions and 12 year-to-year changes (from 1997–1998 to 2008–2009).

  21. 21.

    Named after Walter Duffett, who was Chief Statistician in the early 1970s when these rules were adopted.

  22. 22.

    The detailed tables are available on demand from the first author.

  23. 23.

    The growth decomposition is for the 1997–2008 period, rather than 1997–2009, because the regional gross value added data for 2009 were not yet available by industry at the time of writing this article.

References

  • Bureau of Economic Analysis (2008) Local area personal income and employment methodology (LAPI). U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration. www.bea.gov/regional/pdf/lapi2006/lapi2006.pdf. Accessed October 11, 2012

  • Delisle JP, avec la participation de Lelong C, Kirthichandra A (2000) Méthode de calcul des valeursajoutéesrégionales par branche et des PIB régionaux SEC 1995, années de base 1994–1996. InstitutNational de la Statistique et des ÉtudesÉtconomiques (INSEE), Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Golan A, Judge G, Miller D (1996) Maximum entropy econometrics: robust estimation with limited data. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Günlük-Şenesen G, Bates JM (1988) Some experiments with methods of adjusting unbalanced data matrices. J R Stat Soc Ser A (Stat Soc) 151(3):473–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaynes ET (1957) Information theory and statistical mechanics. Phys Rev 106:620–630, vol 108, pp 171–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Junius T, Oostrehaven J (2003) The solution of updating or regionalizing a matrix with both positive and negative entries. Econ Syst Res 15(1):87–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapur JN, Kesavan HK (1992) Entropy optimization principles with applications. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacey D (2000) UK regional gross domestic product (GDP): methodological guide. Economic Trends, No. 565, Office for National Statistics (ONS), London. http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/index.html. Accessed October 11, 2012

  • Lemelin A (2010) A GRAS variant solving for minimum information loss. Econ Syst Res 21(4):399–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemelin A, Mainguy P (2005) Estimating regional gross domestic product (RGDP) 1997–2000, Institut de la statistique du Québec. http://www.stat.gouv.qc.ca/publications/cptes_econo/pdf2007/Estimation_PIRreg_an.pdf. Accessed October 11, 2012

  • Lemelin A, Mainguy P (2009a) Estimation du produitintérieur brut régional des 17 régionsadministratives du Québec, Cahier technique etméthodologique, Institut de la statistique du Québec. http://www.stat.gouv.qc.ca/publications/cptes_econo/pdf2009/estimation_PIB.pdf. Accessed October 11, 2012

  • Lemelin A, Mainguy P (2009b) Revue des méthodesd’estimation du produitintérieurbrutrégional, Cahiertechnique et méthodologique, Institut de la statistique du Québec. http://www.stat.gouv.qc.ca/clacon/Revue_des_methodes.pdf. Accessed October 11, 2012

  • OECD (2011) “Glossary of Main Terms”, in National Accounts at a Glance 2010, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/na_glance-2010-29-en

  • Panek SD, Baumgardner FT, Mathew JM (2007) Introducing new measures of the metropolitan economy. Prototype GDP-by-metropolitan-Area estimates for 2001–2005. Surv Curr Bus 87: 79–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Polèse M, Shearmur R (2002) The periphery in the knowledge economy. The spatial dynamics of the Canadian economy and the future of non-metropolitan regions in Quebec and the Atlantic Provinces, Coll. Regions in the Knowledge Economy, Montréal, Institut National de la RechercheScientifique – Centre Urbanisation, Culture et Société. http://www.ucs.inrs.ca/ucs/publications/collections/collection-regions-et-economie-du-savoir. Accessed October 11, 2012

  • Rosenthal RE (2010) GAMS – a user’s guide. GAMS Development Corporation, Washington, DC. http://www.gams.com/docs/document.htm. Accessed October 11, 2012

  • Shearmur R, in collaboration with Polèse M (2001) Economic development in Canadian peripheral regions, 1971 to 1996. A statistical overview, Institut National de la RechercheScientifique, Centre Urbanisation, Culture etSociété, and the Canadian Institute for Research on Regional Development. http://www.inrs-ucs.uquebec.ca/default.asp?p=res

  • Theil H (1967) Economics and information theory, vol 7, Studies in mathematical and managerial economics. Rand McNally, Chicago, 7

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to André Lemelin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix 1: Definition of Analytical Regions

Appendix 1: Definition of Analytical Regions

Montreal AR

Montreal AR

Laval AR

Laval AR

Rest-of-Montreal MA

Montreal MA − [Montreal AR + Laval AR]

Perimetropolitanarea

[Laurentides AR + Lanaudière AR +  Montérégie AR] − Rest-of-Montreal MA

Québec MA

Québec MA

Non-metro around Québec MA

[Chaudière-Appalaches AR + Capitale-Nationale AR] − Québec MA

Gatineau MA

Part of the Ottawa-Gatineau MA located in the Province of Quebec

Non-metro around Gatineau MA

Outaouais AR − Gatineau MA

Sherbrooke MA

Sherbrooke MA

Non-metro around Sherbrooke MA

Estrie AR − Sherbrooke MA

Trois-Rivières MA

Trois-Rivières MA

Non-metro around Trois-Rivières MA

[Mauricie AR + Centre-du-Québec AR] −  Trois-Rivières MA

Saguenay MA

Saguenay MA

Non-metro around Saguenay MA

Saguenay – Lac-Saint-Jean AR − Saguenay MA

Rest-of-the-North

Abitibi-Témiscamingue AR + Nord-du-Québec AR + Côte-Nord AR

East

Bas-Saint-Laurent AR + Gaspésie – Îles-de-la- Madeleine AR

Subtotals:

Montreal and peri-metro area

Montreal MA + Perimetropolitan area

Montreal MA

Montreal AR + Laval AR + Rest-of-Montreal MA

Other metropolitan areas

Québec MA + Gatineau MA + Sherbrooke MA + Trois-Rivières MA + Saguenay MA

Montreal MA

Montreal AR + Laval AR + Rest-of-Montreal MA

Other non-metro

Perimetropolitan area + Non-metro away from Montreal

Non-metro away from Montreal

Non-metro around Quõbec MA + Non-metro around Gatineau MA + Non-metro around Sherbrooke MA + Non-metro around Trois-Riviòres MA + Peripheral regions

Peripheral regions

Non-metro around Saguenay MA + Rest-of-the-North + East

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lemelin, A., Mainguy, P., Bilodeau, D., Aubé, R. (2012). GDP Estimates for Regions Within the Province of Quebec: The Changing Geography of Economic Activity. In: Fernández Vázquez, E., Rubiera Morollón, F. (eds) Defining the Spatial Scale in Modern Regional Analysis. Advances in Spatial Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31994-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31994-5_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31993-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31994-5

  • eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics