Abstract
In the first part of this chapter, it is shown that the linear relationship between the energy E n of any quantum state of the hydrogen atom and the negative inverse square of the quantum numbern can be used, together with the Rydberg–Ritz combination principle, to provide an internal check of its own validity, utilizing the most accurate atomic spectral data. This internal check uses the fact that the value of the linear proportionality constant can be obtained both from the slope and from the intercept of the straight line on the energy axis. If these two values differ by more than that allowed by experimental scatter, there is serious doubt about the validity of the inverse-squared relationship. This analysis shows that the relationship is nearly but not exactly satisfied. In the second part of this chapter, it is shown that the usual interpretation of the inverse-squared relationship obscures the fact that it actually leads to imaginary values for the quantum numbers and not to the real integral values as assumed up to now. Both analyses indicate that nonrelativistic quantum mechanics is not based upon solid foundations as assumed up till now, and requires critical reexamination, especially with respect to the role of time.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
It is not the aim of this chapter to repeat any of the theoretical derivations of this equation nor to give a critical assessment of the model and its assumptions and mathematical intricacies here, since it is repeated in every textbook dealing with the subject.
- 2.
The “sewage” in the original German was called “Dreck.”
References
Mohr PJ, Taylor BN, Newell DB (2008) Rev Mod Phys 80:633
Cohen ER, Cvitas T, Frey JG, Holmström B, Kuchitsu K, Marquardt R, Mills I, Pavese E, Quack M, Stöhner J, Strauss HL, Takami M, Thor AJ (2007) Quantities, units and symbols in physical chemistry, 3rd edn. IUPAC/RSC, Cambridge, U.K.
Mohr PJ, Taylor BN (2000) Rev Mod Phys 72:351
Eides MJ, Grotch H, Shelyuto VA (2001) Phys Rep 342:63
Mohr PJ, Taylor BN (2002) Rev Mod Phys 77:1
Jentschura UD, Kotochigova S, Le Bigot E-O, Mohr PJ, Taylor BN (2005) Phys Rev Lett 95:163003
Jentschura U, Mohr PJ, Tan JN, Wundt BJ (2008) Phys Rev Lett 100:160404
Sansonetti JE, Martin WC (2005) J Phys Chem Ref Data 34:1559
Lide DR (ed) (1994) CRC handbook of chemistry and physics, 75th edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Moore CE (1955) Atomic energy levels, vols I and II. National Bureau of Standards, NSRDS-NBS 35 (Reissued 1971)
Dyson F (2006) Private communication in a letter to G. Gabrielse, July 15, 2006, as quoted by Jentschura U, Mohr PJ, Tan JN, Wundt BJ (2008) Phys Rev Lett 100:160404
Boeyens JCA, Schutte CJH (2012) In: Putz MV (ed) Chemical information and computational challenges in 21st century. Nova, New York
Putz MV (ed) (2012) Chemical information and computational challenges in 21st century. Nova, New York
Acknowledgements
During the course of writing this chapter, I was privileged to have had many discussions with Prof. Jan Boeyens whose help and encouragement I gratefully acknowledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schutte, C.J.H. (2013). Is the Rydberg–Ritz Relationship Valid?. In: Boeyens, J., Comba, P. (eds) Electronic Structure and Number Theory. Structure and Bonding, vol 148. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31977-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31977-8_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31976-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31977-8
eBook Packages: Chemistry and Materials ScienceChemistry and Material Science (R0)