DNA Methylation Reprogramming in Preimplantation Development

  • Konstantin Lepikhov
  • Julia Arand
  • Sarah Fuchs
  • Jie Lan
  • Mark Wossidlo
  • Jörn WalterEmail author
Part of the Epigenetics and Human Health book series (EHH)


Shortly after fertilisation the embryonic cells pass through a transient state of totipotency followed by the formation of unipotent trophoblast and pluripotent embryonic stem cells, i.e. the first determined cell lineages which can be derived from the early blastocyst. The molecular processes leading to totipotency formation are initiated by molecules and enzymes provided by the egg cytoplasm. The first molecular changes that can be observed are extensive reconfigurations of the sperm chromatin accompanied by major changes in epigenetic marks of the DNA and chromatin. The epigenetic reprogramming starts in the paternal pronucleus of the zygote and eventually affects both parental chromosomes yielding strongly altered DNA and histone modifications at later developmental stages. In this chapter we will discuss the major molecular differences occurring during the first phase of epigenetic reprogramming with a focus on DNA modification dynamics in the mammalian zygote.


Base Excision Repair Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer Preimplantation Embryo Bovine Embryo Preimplantation Development 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Adenot PG et al (1997) Differential H4 acetylation of paternal and maternal chromatin precedes DNA replication and differential transcriptional activity in pronuclei of 1-cell mouse embryos. Development 124(22):4615–4625PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Akiyama T et al (2004) Regulation of histone acetylation during meiotic maturation in mouse oocytes. Mol Reprod Dev 69(2):222–227PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Aoki F, Worrad DM, Schultz RM (1997) Regulation of transcriptional activity during the first and second cell cycles in the preimplantation mouse embryo. Dev Biol 181(2):296–307PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Arand J et al (2012) In vivo control of CpG and non-CpG DNA methylation by DNA methyltransferases. PLoS Genet 8(6):e1002750PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Arney KL et al (2002) Histone methylation defines epigenetic asymmetry in the mouse zygote. Int J Dev Biol 46(3):317–320PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Balasubramanian D et al (2012) H3K4me3 inversely correlates with DNA methylation at a large class of non-CpG-island-containing start sites. Genome Med 4(5):47PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Barreto G et al (2007) Gadd45a promotes epigenetic gene activation by repair-mediated DNA demethylation. Nature 445(7128):671–675PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bartolomei MS, Ferguson-Smith AC (2011) Mammalian genomic imprinting. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 3(7):a002592PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Beaujean N et al (2004) Non-conservation of mammalian preimplantation methylation dynamics. Curr Biol 14(7):R266–R267PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bellier S et al (1997) Nuclear translocation and carboxyl-terminal domain phosphorylation of RNA polymerase II delineate the two phases of zygotic gene activation in mammalian embryos. EMBO J 16(20):6250–6262PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Bhattacharya SK et al (1999) A mammalian protein with specific demethylase activity for mCpG DNA. Nature 397(6720):579–583PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Bhutani N et al (2010) Reprogramming towards pluripotency requires AID-dependent DNA demethylation. Nature 463(7284):1042–1047PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Blelloch R et al (2006) Reprogramming efficiency following somatic cell nuclear transfer is influenced by the differentiation and methylation state of the donor nucleus. Stem Cells 24(9):2007–2013PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Boiani M et al (2002) Oct4 distribution and level in mouse clones: consequences for pluripotency. Genes Dev 16(10):1209–1219PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Boland MJ, Christman JK (2008) Characterization of Dnmt3b:thymine-DNA glycosylase interaction and stimulation of thymine glycosylase-mediated repair by DNA methyltransferase(s) and RNA. J Mol Biol 379(3):492–504PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Booth MJ et al (2012) Quantitative sequencing of 5-methylcytosine and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine at single-base resolution. Science 336(6083):934–937PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Borgel J et al (2010) Targets and dynamics of promoter DNA methylation during early mouse development. Nat Genet 42(12):1093–1100PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Bortvin A et al (2003) Incomplete reactivation of Oct4-related genes in mouse embryos cloned from somatic nuclei. Development 130(8):1673–1680PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Boskovic A et al (2012) Analysis of active chromatin modifications in early mammalian embryos reveals uncoupling of H2A.Z acetylation and H3K36 trimethylation from embryonic genome activation. Epigenetics 7(7):747–757PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Bostick M et al (2007) UHRF1 plays a role in maintaining DNA methylation in mammalian cells. Science 317(5845):1760–1764PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Brykczynska U et al (2010) Repressive and active histone methylation mark distinct promoters in human and mouse spermatozoa. Nat Struct Mol Biol 17(6):679–687PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Burton A, Torres-Padilla ME (2010) Epigenetic reprogramming and development: a unique heterochromatin organization in the preimplantation mouse embryo. Brief Funct Genomics 9(5–6):444–454PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Cardoso MC, Leonhardt H (1999) DNA methyltransferase is actively retained in the cytoplasm during early development. J Cell Biol 147(1):25–32PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Cedar H, Bergman Y (2009) Linking DNA methylation and histone modification: patterns and paradigms. Nat Rev Genet 10(5):295–304PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Chen CC, Wang KY, Shen CK (2012) The mammalian de novo DNA methyltransferases DNMT3A and DNMT3B are also DNA 5-hydroxymethylcytosine dehydroxymethylases. J Biol Chem 287(40):33116–33121PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Choi Y et al (2002) DEMETER, a DNA glycosylase domain protein, is required for endosperm gene imprinting and seed viability in arabidopsis. Cell 110(1):33–42PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Cirio MC et al (2008) Preimplantation expression of the somatic form of Dnmt1 suggests a role in the inheritance of genomic imprints. BMC Dev Biol 8:9PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Cortazar D et al (2011) Embryonic lethal phenotype reveals a function of TDG in maintaining epigenetic stability. Nature 470(7334):419–423PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Cortellino S et al (2011) Thymine DNA glycosylase is essential for active DNA demethylation by linked deamination-base excision repair. Cell 146(1):67–79PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Dean WL, Kelsey G, Reik W (2001a) Generation of monoparental embryos for investigation into genomic imprinting. Methods Mol Biol 181:1–19PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Dean W et al (2001b) Conservation of methylation reprogramming in mammalian development: aberrant reprogramming in cloned embryos. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98(24):13734–13738PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Deplus R et al (2002) Dnmt3L is a transcriptional repressor that recruits histone deacetylase. Nucleic Acids Res 30(17):3831–3838PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Dhayalan A et al (2010) The Dnmt3a PWWP domain reads histone 3 lysine 36 trimethylation and guides DNA methylation. J Biol Chem 285(34):26114–26120PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Ding F, Chaillet JR (2002) In vivo stabilization of the Dnmt1 (cytosine-5)- methyltransferase protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99(23):14861–14866PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Eilertsen KJ et al (2007) Targeting cellular memory to reprogram the epigenome, restore potential, and improve somatic cell nuclear transfer. Anim Reprod Sci 98(1–2):129–146PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Engel N et al (2009) Conserved DNA methylation in Gadd45a(-/-) mice. Epigenetics 4(2):98–99PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Farthing CR et al (2008) Global mapping of DNA methylation in mouse promoters reveals epigenetic reprogramming of pluripotency genes. PLoS Genet 4(6):e1000116PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Feil R (2009) Epigenetic asymmetry in the zygote and mammalian development. Int J Dev Biol 53(2–3):191–201PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Ficz G et al (2011) Dynamic regulation of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mouse ES cells and during differentiation. Nature 473(7347):398–402PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Frauer C et al (2011) Recognition of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine by the Uhrf1 SRA Domain. PLoS One 6(6):e21306PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Fulka H, Fulka J Jr (2006) No differences in the DNA methylation pattern in mouse zygotes produced in vivo, in vitro, or by intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril 86(5):1534–1536PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Fulka H et al (2004) DNA methylation pattern in human zygotes and developing embryos. Reproduction (Cambridge, England) 128(6):703–708Google Scholar
  43. Gaudet F et al (2004) Dnmt1 expression in pre- and postimplantation embryogenesis and the maintenance of IAP silencing. Mol Cell Biol 24(4):1640–1648PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Gehring M et al (2006) DEMETER DNA glycosylase establishes MEDEA polycomb gene self-imprinting by allele-specific demethylation. Cell 124(3):495–506PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Gregory DJ, Mikhaylova L, Fedulov AV (2012) Selective DNA demethylation by fusion of TDG with a sequence-specific DNA-binding domain. Epigenetics 7(4):344–349PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Grohmann M et al (2005) Restricted mobility of Dnmt1 in preimplantation embryos: implications for epigenetic reprogramming. BMC Dev Biol 5:18PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Gu L, Wang Q, Sun QY (2010) Histone modifications during mammalian oocyte maturation: dynamics, regulation and functions. Cell Cycle 9(10):1942–1950PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Gu TP et al (2011) The role of Tet3 DNA dioxygenase in epigenetic reprogramming by oocytes. Nature 477(7366):606–610PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Guenatri M et al (2013) Plasticity in Dnmt3L-dependent and -independent modes of de novo methylation in the developing mouse embryo. Development 140(3):562–572PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Guo JU et al (2011) Hydroxylation of 5-methylcytosine by TET1 promotes active DNA demethylation in the adult brain. Cell 145(3):423–434PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Gurdon JB, Elsdale TR, Fischberg M (1958) Sexually mature individuals of Xenopus laevis from the transplantation of single somatic nuclei. Nature 182(4627):64–65PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Ha M et al (2011) Coordinated histone modifications are associated with gene expression variation within and between species. Genome Res 21(4):590–598PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Hajkova P et al (2002) Epigenetic reprogramming in mouse primordial germ cells. Mech Dev 117(1–2):15–23PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Hajkova P et al (2010) Genome-wide reprogramming in the mouse germ line entails the base excision repair pathway. Science 329(5987):78–82PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Hake SB et al (2006) Expression patterns and post-translational modifications associated with mammalian histone H3 variants. J Biol Chem 281(1):559–568PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Halley-Stott RP, Gurdon JB (2013) Epigenetic memory in the context of nuclear reprogramming and cancer. Brief Funct Genomics 12(3):164–173PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Hammoud SS et al (2009) Distinctive chromatin in human sperm packages genes for embryo development. Nature 460(7254):473–478PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Hashimoto H, Vertino PM, Cheng X (2010) Molecular coupling of DNA methylation and histone methylation. Epigenomics 2(5):657–669PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Hashimoto H, Zhang X, Cheng X (2012a) Excision of thymine and 5-hydroxymethyluracil by the MBD4 DNA glycosylase domain: structural basis and implications for active DNA demethylation. Nucleic Acids Res 40(17):8276–8284PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Hashimoto H et al (2012b) Excision of 5-hydroxymethyluracil and 5-carboxylcytosine by the thymine DNA glycosylase domain: its structural basis and implications for active DNA demethylation. Nucleic Acids Res 40(20):10203–10214PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Hata K et al (2002) Dnmt3L cooperates with the Dnmt3 family of de novo DNA methyltransferases to establish maternal imprints in mice. Development 129(8):1983–1993PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Hatanaka Y et al (2013) GSE is a maternal factor involved in active DNA demethylation in zygotes. PLoS One 8(4):e60205PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Hayatsu H, Shiragami M (1979) Reaction of bisulfite with the 5-hydroxymethyl group in pyrimidines and in phage DNAs. Biochemistry 18(4):632–637PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. He YF et al (2011) Tet-mediated formation of 5-carboxylcytosine and its excision by TDG in mammalian DNA. Science 333(6047):1303–1307PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Hegde ML, Hazra TK, Mitra S (2008) Early steps in the DNA base excision/single-strand interruption repair pathway in mammalian cells. Cell Res 18(1):27–47PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Hendrich B et al (1999) The thymine glycosylase MBD4 can bind to the product of deamination at methylated CpG sites. Nature 401(6750):301–304PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Hendrich B et al (2001) Closely related proteins MBD2 and MBD3 play distinctive but interacting roles in mouse development. Genes Dev 15(6):710–723PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Hirasawa R, Sasaki H (2009) Dynamic transition of Dnmt3b expression in mouse pre- and early post-implantation embryos. Gene Expr Patterns 9(1):27–30PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Hirasawa R et al (2008) Maternal and zygotic Dnmt1 are necessary and sufficient for the maintenance of DNA methylation imprints during preimplantation development. Genes Dev 22(12):1607–1616PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Hou J et al (2008) Epigenetic modification of histone 3 at lysine 9 in sheep zygotes and its relationship with DNA methylation. BMC Dev Biol 8(1):60PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Howlett SK, Reik W (1991) Methylation levels of maternal and paternal genomes during preimplantation development. Development 113(1):119–127PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Hsieh TF et al (2009) Genome-wide demethylation of Arabidopsis endosperm. Science 324(5933):1451–1454PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Hu JL et al (2009) The N-terminus of histone H3 is required for de novo DNA methylation in chromatin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106(52):22187–22192PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Hu X et al (2014) Tet and TDG mediate DNA demethylation essential for mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition in somatic cell reprogramming. Cell Stem Cell 14(4):512–522PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Huang Y et al (2010) The behaviour of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in bisulfite sequencing. PLoS One 5(1):e8888PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Humpherys D et al (2002) Abnormal gene expression in cloned mice derived from embryonic stem cell and cumulus cell nuclei. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99(20):12889–12894PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Huntriss J et al (2004) Expression of mRNAs for DNA methyltransferases and methyl-CpG-binding proteins in the human female germ line, preimplantation embryos, and embryonic stem cells. Mol Reprod Dev 67(3):323–336PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Inoue A, Zhang Y (2011) Replication-dependent loss of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mouse preimplantation embryos. Science 334(6053):194PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Inoue K et al (2010) Impeding Xist expression from the active X chromosome improves mouse somatic cell nuclear transfer. Science 330(6003):496–499PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Inoue A et al (2011) Generation and replication-dependent dilution of 5fC and 5caC during mouse preimplantation development. Cell Res 21(12):1670–1676PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Iqbal K et al (2011) Reprogramming of the paternal genome upon fertilization involves genome-wide oxidation of 5-methylcytosine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108(9):3642–3647PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Ito S et al (2011) Tet proteins can convert 5-methylcytosine to 5-formylcytosine and 5-carboxylcytosine. Science 333(6047):1300–1303PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Jenuwein T, Allis CD (2001) Translating the histone code. Science 293(5532):1074–1080PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Jeong YS et al (2009) Cytoplasmic localization of oocyte-specific variant of porcine DNA methyltransferase-1 during early development. Dev Dyn 238(7):1666–1673PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Jin SG, Guo C, Pfeifer GP (2008) GADD45A does not promote DNA demethylation. PLoS Genet 4(3):e1000013PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Jost JP (1993) Nuclear extracts of chicken embryos promote an active demethylation of DNA by excision repair of 5-methyldeoxycytidine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 90(10):4684–4688PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Jost JP et al (1995) Mechanisms of DNA demethylation in chicken embryos. Purification and properties of a 5-methylcytosine-DNA glycosylase. J Biol Chem 270(17):9734–9739PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Jurkowska RZ et al (2008) Formation of nucleoprotein filaments by mammalian DNA methyltransferase Dnmt3a in complex with regulator Dnmt3L. Nucleic Acids Res 36(21):6656–6663PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Kaneda M et al (2004) Essential role for de novo DNA methyltransferase Dnmt3a in paternal and maternal imprinting. Nature 429(6994):900–903PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Kanka J (2003) Gene expression and chromatin structure in the pre-implantation embryo. Theriogenology 59(1):3–19PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Kim JM et al (2003) Changes in histone acetylation during mouse oocyte meiosis. J Cell Biol 162(1):37–46PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Kim SH et al (2004) Differential DNA methylation reprogramming of various repetitive sequences in mouse preimplantation embryos. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 324(1):58–63PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Kinney SM et al (2011) Tissue-specific distribution and dynamic changes of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mammalian genomes. J Biol Chem 286(28):24685–24693PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Kishigami S et al (2006a) Significant improvement of mouse cloning technique by treatment with trichostatin A after somatic nuclear transfer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 340(1):183–189PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Kishigami S et al (2006b) Epigenetic abnormalities of the mouse paternal zygotic genome associated with microinsemination of round spermatids. Dev Biol 289(1):195–205PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Kishigami S et al (2007) Successful mouse cloning of an outbred strain by trichostatin A treatment after somatic nuclear transfer. J Reprod Dev 53(1):165–170PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Kobayashi H et al (2012) Contribution of intragenic DNA methylation in mouse gametic DNA methylomes to establish oocyte-specific heritable marks. PLoS Genet 8(1):e1002440PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. Kriaucionis S, Heintz N (2009) The nuclear DNA base 5-hydroxymethylcytosine is present in Purkinje neurons and the brain. Science 324(5929):929–930PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. Kurihara Y et al (2008) Maintenance of genomic methylation patterns during preimplantation development requires the somatic form of DNA methyltransferase 1. Dev Biol 313(1):335–346PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. Lachner M, O’Sullivan RJ, Jenuwein T (2003) An epigenetic road map for histone lysine methylation. J Cell Sci 116(Pt 11):2117–2124PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. Lane N et al (2003) Resistance of IAPs to methylation reprogramming may provide a mechanism for epigenetic inheritance in the mouse. Genesis 35(2):88–93PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. Lawson KA, Hage WJ (1994) Clonal analysis of the origin of primordial germ cells in the mouse. Ciba Found Symp 182:68–84, discussion 84–91PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. Lepikhov K, Walter J (2004) Differential dynamics of histone H3 methylation at positions K4 and K9 in the mouse zygote. BMC Dev Biol 4:12PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. Lepikhov K et al (2008) Evidence for conserved DNA and histone H3 methylation reprogramming in mouse, bovine and rabbit zygotes. Epigenetics Chromatin 1(1):8PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. Lepikhov K et al (2010) DNA methylation reprogramming and DNA repair in the mouse zygote. Int J Dev Biol 54(11–12):1565–1574PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. Li YQ et al (2007) Association of Dnmt3a and thymine DNA glycosylase links DNA methylation with base-excision repair. Nucleic Acids Res 35(2):390–400PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. Li WW, Gong L, Bayley H (2013) Single-molecule detection of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in DNA through chemical modification and nanopore analysis. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 52(16):4350–4355PubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. Liu H, Kim JM, Aoki F (2004) Regulation of histone H3 lysine 9 methylation in oocytes and early pre-implantation embryos. Development 131(10):2269–2280PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. Liu W et al (2014) Asymmetric reprogramming capacity of parental pronuclei in mouse zygotes. Cell Rep 6(6):1008–1016PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. Loyola A, Almouzni G (2007) Marking histone H3 variants: how, when and why? Trends Biochem Sci 32(9):425–433PubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. Lucifero D et al (2007) Coordinate regulation of DNA methyltransferase expression during oogenesis. BMC Dev Biol 7:36PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. Maalouf WE, Alberio R, Campbell KH (2008) Differential acetylation of histone H4 lysine during development of in vitro fertilized, cloned and parthenogenetically activated bovine embryos. Epigenetics 3(4):199–209PubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. Magnani L, Johnson CM, Cabot RA (2008) Expression of eukaryotic elongation initiation factor 1A differentially marks zygotic genome activation in biparental and parthenogenetic porcine embryos and correlates with in vitro developmental potential. Reprod Fertil Dev 20(7):818–825PubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. Maiti A, Drohat AC (2011) Thymine DNA glycosylase can rapidly excise 5-formylcytosine and 5-carboxylcytosine: Potential implications for active demethylation of CpG sites. J Biol Chem 286(41):35334–35338PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. Matoba S et al (2011) RNAi-mediated knockdown of Xist can rescue the impaired postimplantation development of cloned mouse embryos. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108(51):20621–20626PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  116. Mayer W et al (2000) Demethylation of the zygotic paternal genome. Nature 403(6769):501–502PubMedGoogle Scholar
  117. McGrath J, Solter D (1984) Completion of mouse embryogenesis requires both the maternal and paternal genomes. Cell 37(1):179–183PubMedGoogle Scholar
  118. McKittrick E et al (2004) Histone H3.3 is enriched in covalent modifications associated with active chromatin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101(6):1525–1530PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. Mertineit C et al (1998) Sex-specific exons control DNA methyltransferase in mammalian germ cells. Development 125(5):889–897PubMedGoogle Scholar
  120. Metivier R et al (2008) Cyclical DNA methylation of a transcriptionally active promoter. Nature 452(7183):45–50PubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. Miller D, Brinkworth M, Iles D (2010) Paternal DNA packaging in spermatozoa: more than the sum of its parts? DNA, histones, protamines and epigenetics. Reproduction 139(2):287–301PubMedGoogle Scholar
  122. Mohan KN, Ding F, Chaillet JR (2011) Distinct roles of DMAP1 in mouse development. Mol Cell Biol 31(9):1861–1869PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  123. Monk M, Boubelik M, Lehnert S (1987) Temporal and regional changes in DNA methylation in the embryonic, extraembryonic and germ cell lineages during mouse embryo development. Development 99(3):371–382PubMedGoogle Scholar
  124. Monk M, Adams RL, Rinaldi A (1991) Decrease in DNA methylase activity during preimplantation development in the mouse. Development 112(1):189–192PubMedGoogle Scholar
  125. Morgan HD et al (2004) Activation-induced cytidine deaminase deaminates 5-methylcytosine in DNA and is expressed in pluripotent tissues: implications for epigenetic reprogramming. J Biol Chem 279(50):52353–52360PubMedGoogle Scholar
  126. Morgan HD et al (2005) Epigenetic reprogramming in mammals. Human Mol Genet 14 Spec No 1:R47–58Google Scholar
  127. Muramatsu M et al (2000) Class switch recombination and hypermutation require activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID), a potential RNA editing enzyme. Cell 102(5):553–563PubMedGoogle Scholar
  128. Nabel CS et al (2012) AID/APOBEC deaminases disfavor modified cytosines implicated in DNA demethylation. Nat Chem Biol 8(9):751–758PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  129. Nakamura T et al (2007) PGC7/Stella protects against DNA demethylation in early embryogenesis. Nat Cell Biol 9(1):64–71PubMedGoogle Scholar
  130. Nakamura T et al (2012) PGC7 binds histone H3K9me2 to protect against conversion of 5mC to 5hmC in early embryos. Nature 486(7403):415–419PubMedGoogle Scholar
  131. Nakashima H et al (2013) Effects of dppa3 on DNA methylation dynamics during primordial germ cell development in mice. Biol Reprod 88(5):125PubMedGoogle Scholar
  132. Neri F et al (2013) Genome-wide analysis identifies a functional association of Tet1 and Polycomb PRC2 in mouse embryonic stem cells. Genome Biol 14(8):R91PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  133. Ng HH et al (1999) MBD2 is a transcriptional repressor belonging to the MeCP1 histone deacetylase complex. Nat Genet 23(1):58–61PubMedGoogle Scholar
  134. Okada Y et al (2010) A role for the elongator complex in zygotic paternal genome demethylation. Nature 463(7280):554–558PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  135. Okano M et al (1999) DNA methyltransferases Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b are essential for de novo methylation and mammalian development. Cell 99(3):247–257PubMedGoogle Scholar
  136. Okitsu CY, Hsieh CL (2007) DNA methylation dictates histone H3K4 methylation. Mol Cell Biol 27(7):2746–2757PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  137. Ooi SK et al (2007) DNMT3L connects unmethylated lysine 4 of histone H3 to de novo methylation of DNA. Nature 448(7154):714–717PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  138. Oswald J et al (2000) Active demethylation of the paternal genome in the mouse zygote. Curr Biol 10(8):475–478PubMedGoogle Scholar
  139. Otani J et al (2009) Structural basis for recognition of H3K4 methylation status by the DNA methyltransferase 3A ATRX-DNMT3-DNMT3L domain. EMBO Rep 10(11):1235–1241PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  140. Penterman J, Uzawa R, Fischer RL (2007) Genetic interactions between DNA demethylation and methylation in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 145(4):1549–1557PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  141. Pirola L et al (2011) Genome-wide analysis distinguishes hyperglycemia regulated epigenetic signatures of primary vascular cells. Genome Res 21(10):1601–1615PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  142. Popp C et al (2010) Genome-wide erasure of DNA methylation in mouse primordial germ cells is affected by AID deficiency. Nature 463(7284):1101–1105PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  143. Probst AV et al (2007) Structural differences in centromeric heterochromatin are spatially reconciled on fertilisation in the mouse zygote. Chromosoma 116(4):403–415PubMedGoogle Scholar
  144. Rai K et al (2008) DNA demethylation in zebrafish involves the coupling of a deaminase, a glycosylase, and gadd45. Cell 135(7):1201–1212PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  145. Raiber EA et al (2012) Genome-wide distribution of 5-formylcytosine in embryonic stem cells is associated with transcription and depends on thymine DNA glycosylase. Genome Biol 13(8):R69PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  146. Ratnam S et al (2002) Dynamics of Dnmt1 methyltransferase expression and intracellular localization during oogenesis and preimplantation development. Dev Biol 245(2):304–314PubMedGoogle Scholar
  147. Reese KJ et al (2007) Maintenance of paternal methylation and repression of the imprinted H19 gene requires MBD3. PLoS Genet 3(8):e137PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  148. Reik W et al (2003) Epigenetic asymmetry in the mammalian zygote and early embryo: relationship to lineage commitment? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 358(1436):1403–1409, discussion 1409PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  149. Rogakou EP et al (1998) DNA double-stranded breaks induce histone H2AX phosphorylation on serine 139. J Biol Chem 273(10):5858–5868PubMedGoogle Scholar
  150. Rountree MR, Bachman KE, Baylin SB (2000) DNMT1 binds HDAC2 and a new co-repressor, DMAP1, to form a complex at replication foci. Nat Genet 25(3):269–277PubMedGoogle Scholar
  151. Ruddock-D’Cruz NT et al (2008) Dynamic changes in localization of Chromobox (Cbx) family members during the maternal to embryonic transition. Mol Reprod Dev 75(3):477–488PubMedGoogle Scholar
  152. Russell DF, Betts DH (2008) Alternative splicing and expression analysis of bovine DNA methyltransferase 1. Dev Dyn 237(4):1051–1059PubMedGoogle Scholar
  153. Saitou M, Kagiwada S, Kurimoto K (2012) Epigenetic reprogramming in mouse pre-implantation development and primordial germ cells. Development 139(1):15–31PubMedGoogle Scholar
  154. Salvaing J et al (2012) 5-Methylcytosine and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine spatiotemporal profiles in the mouse zygote. PLoS One 7(5):e38156PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  155. Sancar A, Reardon JT (2004) Nucleotide excision repair in E. coli and man. Adv Protein Chem 69:43–71PubMedGoogle Scholar
  156. Sancar A et al (2004) Molecular mechanisms of mammalian DNA repair and the DNA damage checkpoints. Annu Rev Biochem 73:39–85PubMedGoogle Scholar
  157. Santos F, Dean W (2004) Epigenetic reprogramming during early development in mammals. Reproduction 127(6):643–651PubMedGoogle Scholar
  158. Santos F et al (2002) Dynamic reprogramming of DNA methylation in the early mouse embryo. Dev Biol 241(1):172–182PubMedGoogle Scholar
  159. Santos F et al (2005) Dynamic chromatin modifications characterise the first cell cycle in mouse embryos. Dev Biol 280(1):225–236PubMedGoogle Scholar
  160. Sarmento OF et al (2004) Dynamic alterations of specific histone modifications during early murine development. J Cell Sci 117(Pt 19):4449–4459PubMedGoogle Scholar
  161. Schiesser S et al (2012) Mechanism and stem-cell activity of 5-carboxycytosine decarboxylation determined by isotope tracing. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 51(26):6516–6520PubMedGoogle Scholar
  162. Schiesser S et al (2013) Deamination, oxidation, and C-C bond cleavage reactivity of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine, 5-formylcytosine, and 5-carboxycytosine. J Am Chem Soc 135(39):14593–14599PubMedGoogle Scholar
  163. Schultz RM, Kopf GS (1995) Molecular basis of mammalian egg activation. Curr Top Dev Biol 30:21–62PubMedGoogle Scholar
  164. Sharif J et al (2007) The SRA protein Np95 mediates epigenetic inheritance by recruiting Dnmt1 to methylated DNA. Nature 450(7171):908–912PubMedGoogle Scholar
  165. Shilatifard A (2006) Chromatin modifications by methylation and ubiquitination: implications in the regulation of gene expression. Annu Rev Biochem 75:243–269PubMedGoogle Scholar
  166. Shin SW et al (2010) Inhibition of the ubiquitin-proteasome system leads to delay of the onset of ZGA gene expression. J Reprod Dev 56(6):655–663PubMedGoogle Scholar
  167. Shirane K et al (2013) Mouse oocyte methylomes at base resolution reveal genome-wide accumulation of non-CpG methylation and role of DNA methyltransferases. PLoS Genet 9(4):e1003439PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  168. Smallwood SA et al (2011) Dynamic CpG island methylation landscape in oocytes and preimplantation embryos. Nat Genet 43(8):811–814PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  169. Smith ZD et al (2012) A unique regulatory phase of DNA methylation in the early mammalian embryo. Nature 484(7394):339–344PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  170. Suzuki T et al (2006) Zygotically activated genes are suppressed in mouse nuclear transferred embryos. Cloning Stem Cells 8(4):295–304PubMedGoogle Scholar
  171. Suzuki J Jr et al (2011) Loss of methylation at H19 DMD is associated with biallelic expression and reduced development in cattle derived by somatic cell nuclear transfer. Biol Reprod 84:947–956PubMedGoogle Scholar
  172. Tahiliani M et al (2009) Conversion of 5-methylcytosine to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mammalian DNA by MLL partner TET1. Science 324(5929):930–935PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  173. Talbert PB, Henikoff S (2010) Histone variants – ancient wrap artists of the epigenome. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 11(4):264–275PubMedGoogle Scholar
  174. Tan MH et al (2013) An Oct4-Sall4-Nanog network controls developmental progression in the pre-implantation mouse embryo. Mol Syst Biol 9:632PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  175. Tanaka M et al (2001) A mammalian oocyte-specific linker histone gene H1oo: homology with the genes for the oocyte-specific cleavage stage histone (cs-H1) of sea urchin and the B4/H1M histone of the frog. Development 128(5):655–664PubMedGoogle Scholar
  176. Tanaka M et al (2003) H1oo: a pre-embryonic H1 linker histone in search of a function. Mol Cell Endocrinol 202(1–2):5–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  177. Telford NA, Watson AJ, Schultz GA (1990) Transition from maternal to embryonic control in early mammalian development: a comparison of several species. Mol Reprod Dev 26(1):90–100PubMedGoogle Scholar
  178. Teranishi T et al (2004) Rapid replacement of somatic linker histones with the oocyte-specific linker histone H1foo in nuclear transfer. Dev Biol 266(1):76–86PubMedGoogle Scholar
  179. Tomizawa S et al (2011) Dynamic stage-specific changes in imprinted differentially methylated regions during early mammalian development and prevalence of non-CpG methylation in oocytes. Development 138(5):811–820PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  180. Valinluck V, Sowers LC (2007) Endogenous cytosine damage products alter the site selectivity of human DNA maintenance methyltransferase DNMT1. Cancer Res 67(3):946–950PubMedGoogle Scholar
  181. van der Heijden GW et al (2005) Asymmetry in histone H3 variants and lysine methylation between paternal and maternal chromatin of the early mouse zygote. Mech Dev 122(9):1008–1022PubMedGoogle Scholar
  182. Vassena R et al (2007) Tough beginnings: alterations in the transcriptome of cloned embryos during the first two cell cycles. Dev Biol 304(1):75–89PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  183. Wakayama T, Yanagimachi R (2001) Mouse cloning with nucleus donor cells of different age and type. Mol Reprod Dev 58(4):376–383PubMedGoogle Scholar
  184. Wang L et al (2014) Programming and inheritance of parental DNA methylomes in mammals. Cell 157(4):979–991PubMedGoogle Scholar
  185. Waurich R et al (2010) Embryonic gene activation in in vitro produced embryos of the domestic cat (Felis catus). Reproduction 140(4):531–540PubMedGoogle Scholar
  186. Weber M et al (2007) Distribution, silencing potential and evolutionary impact of promoter DNA methylation in the human genome. Nat Genet 39(4):457–466PubMedGoogle Scholar
  187. Wijesinghe P, Bhagwat AS (2012) Efficient deamination of 5-methylcytosines in DNA by human APOBEC3A, but not by AID or APOBEC3G. Nucleic Acids Res 40(18):9206–9217PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  188. (2013) List of animals that have been clonedGoogle Scholar
  189. Wilmut I et al (1997) Viable offspring derived from fetal and adult mammalian cells. Nature 385(6619):810–813PubMedGoogle Scholar
  190. Wossidlo M et al (2010) Dynamic link of DNA demethylation, DNA strand breaks and repair in mouse zygotes. EMBO J 29(11):1877–1888PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  191. Wossidlo M et al (2011) 5-Hydroxymethylcytosine in the mammalian zygote is linked with epigenetic reprogramming. Nat Commun 2:241PubMedGoogle Scholar
  192. Wu H et al (2011) Dual functions of Tet1 in transcriptional regulation in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nature 473(7347):389–393PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  193. Xu Y et al (2011) Genome-wide regulation of 5hmC, 5mC, and gene expression by Tet1 hydroxylase in mouse embryonic stem cells. Mol Cell 42(4):451–464PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  194. Yamaguchi S et al (2013) Dynamics of 5-methylcytosine and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine during germ cell reprogramming. Cell Res 23(3):329–339PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  195. Yamazaki Y et al (2006) Gradual DNA demethylation of the Oct4 promoter in cloned mouse embryos. Mol Reprod Dev 73(2):180–188PubMedGoogle Scholar
  196. Yang J et al (2007) Epigenetic marks in cloned rhesus monkey embryos: comparison with counterparts produced in vitro. Biol Reprod 76(1):36–42PubMedGoogle Scholar
  197. Yu M et al (2012) Base-resolution analysis of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in the Mammalian genome. Cell 149(6):1368–1380PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  198. Yue MX et al (2012) Abnormal DNA methylation in oocytes could be associated with a decrease in reproductive potential in old mice. J Assist Reprod Genet 29(7):643–650PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  199. Zernicka-Goetz M (1994) Activation of embryonic genes during preimplantation rat development. Mol Reprod Dev 38(1):30–35PubMedGoogle Scholar
  200. Zhang Y et al (2010) Chromatin methylation activity of Dnmt3a and Dnmt3a/3L is guided by interaction of the ADD domain with the histone H3 tail. Nucleic Acids Res 38(13):4246–4253PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  201. Zhang L et al (2012) Thymine DNA glycosylase specifically recognizes 5-carboxylcytosine-modified DNA. Nat Chem Biol 8(4):328–330PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  202. Zharkov DO et al (2002) Structural analysis of an Escherichia coli endonuclease VIII covalent reaction intermediate. EMBO J 21(4):789–800PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  203. Zhou VW, Goren A, Bernstein BE (2011) Charting histone modifications and the functional organization of mammalian genomes. Nat Rev Genet 12(1):7–18PubMedGoogle Scholar
  204. Zhu B et al (2000a) 5-Methylcytosine-DNA glycosylase activity is present in a cloned G/T mismatch DNA glycosylase associated with the chicken embryo DNA demethylation complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97(10):5135–5139PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  205. Zhu B et al (2000b) 5-Methylcytosine DNA glycosylase activity is also present in the human MBD4 (G/T mismatch glycosylase) and in a related avian sequence. Nucleic Acids Res 28(21):4157–4165PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  206. Zhu B et al (2001) Overexpression of 5-methylcytosine DNA glycosylase in human embryonic kidney cells EcR293 demethylates the promoter of a hormone-regulated reporter gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98(9):5031–5036PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  207. Zingg JM et al (1996) Methylation inhibitors can increase the rate of cytosine deamination by (cytosine-5)-DNA methyltransferase. Nucleic Acids Res 24(16):3267–3275PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  208. Zingg JM, Shen JC, Jones PA (1998) Enzyme-mediated cytosine deamination by the bacterial methyltransferase M.MspI. Biochem J 332(Pt 1):223–230PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Konstantin Lepikhov
    • 1
  • Julia Arand
    • 1
  • Sarah Fuchs
    • 1
  • Jie Lan
    • 1
  • Mark Wossidlo
    • 1
  • Jörn Walter
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.GenetikUniversität des SaarlandesSaarbrückenGermany
  2. 2.Universität des Saarlandes FR84. BiosciencesDept. of Genetics & EpigeneticsSaarbrückenGermany

Personalised recommendations