Relational Networks of Conditional Preferences

(Extended Abstract)
  • Frédéric Koriche
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7207)


Like relational probabilistic models, the need for relational preference models naturally arises in real-world applications involving multiple, heterogeneous, and richly interconnected objects. On the one hand, relational preferences should be represented into statements which are natural for human users to express. On the other hand, relational preference models should be endowed with a structure that supports tractable forms of reasoning and learning. This paper introduces the framework of conditional preference relational networks (CPR-nets), that maintains the spirit of the popular “CP-nets” by expressing relational preferences in a natural way using the ceteris paribus semantics. We show that acyclic CPR-nets support tractable inference for optimization and ranking tasks. In addition, we show that in the online learning model, tree-structured CPR-nets are efficiently learnable from both optimization tasks and ranking tasks. Our results are corroborated with experiments on a large-scale movie recommendation dataset.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Boutilier, C., Brafman, R.I., Domshlak, C., Hoos, H.H., Poole, D.: CP-nets: A tool for representing and reasoning with conditional Ceteris Paribus preference statements. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 21, 135–191 (2004)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brafman, R.I., Domshlak, C.: Preference handling - an introductory tutorial. AI Magazine 30(1), 58–86 (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brafman, R.I., Domshlak, C., Shimony, S.E.: On graphical modeling of preference and importance. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 25, 389–424 (2006)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cantador, I., Brusilovsky, P., Kuflik, T.: 2nd workshop on information heterogeneity and fusion in recommender systems (HetRec 2011). In: Proc. of the 5th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, RecSys 2011 (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cesa-Bianchi, N., Lugosi, G.: Prediction, Learning, and Games, Cambridge (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Freund, Y., Schapire, R.E.: A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 55(1), 119–139 (1997)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tutte, W.T.: Graph Theory, Cambridge (1984)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frédéric Koriche
    • 1
  1. 1.LIRMMUniversité Montpellier IIFrance

Personalised recommendations