Skip to main content

Breeding of the Tea Plant (Camellia sinensis) in India

  • Chapter
Global Tea Breeding

Abstract

The indigenous Assam tea plant was discovered by Robert Bruce in 1823. However, commercial tea cultivation was initiated in India during 1834, using a China tea plant. The better cup quality produced by the Assam tea plant popularized it as an important planting material in the tea industries of the country. Seeds were the only source of propagation until the discovery of the vegetative method. As a result, seed jat populations of unknown parents created a wide range of genetic variation and resulting inconsistency in their performance. Considering the need for improved planting materials for the tea industry, Tocklai Experimental Station (TES) Tea Research Association, initiated a tea breeding programme in 1930, under which germplasms were collected based on trait specific phenotypic characteristics. Promising plants selected from heterogeneous jat populations as well as from wild tea patches were characterized and preserved in the gene bank of TES, along with some of the non-tea Camellia species for utilization in the breeding programmes. The Tea Research Foundation, United Planters’ Association of Southern India (UPASI), initiated a similar program in 1963 and collected germplasms were preserved in their gene bank. The technique of vegetative propagation, standardized in 1955, provided scope for developing improved clonal cultivars as well as biclonal seed cultivars through hybridization. From the selected plants from old seed jats and progenies of biclonal hybrids, 153 locally adapted and 31 universal clones were developed for the tea industry. Under polyploid breeding triploids, tetraploids and aneuploids were produced through hybridization, out of which high yielding quality triploid plants were selected, cloned and made available for plantation. Water logging tolerant genotypes have been selected and used as parents in the breeding programme for the development of tolerant cultivars and progenies. EST’s have been developed from Camellia species and a cDNA library was constructed. Marker development for draught resistance and blister blight disease is under progress using cDNA-AFLP and EST-SSR techniques. Transgenic technology has been developed and vector construction is completed to confer resistance against blister blight. The micropropagation technique has also been standardized for quick multiplication of these biotechnologically modified plantlets. Details of tea breeding in India are discussed in this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Annual Scientific Report, Tocklai Experimental Station 1966–1967, 1968–1969, 1969–1970, 1973–1974, 1974–1975, 1976–1977, 1978–1979, 1979–1980, 1989–1990, 1990–1991, 1991–1992, 1992–1993, 1993–1994, 1994–1995, 1995–1996, 1997–1998, 2007–2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed N, Singh ID (1993) A technique for rapid identification of ploidy levels in tea. Two and A Bud, 40(2): 31–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amma S (1975) Selection of high yielding clones of tea. Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly, 8: 214–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barua DN (1961) The significance of seed-size in cultivated tea (Camellia sinensis L.). Empire Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 29: 143–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barua DN (1963a) Use and abuse of clones. Two and A Bud, 10(1): 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barua DN (1963b) Characteristics of the Tocklai released clones. Two and A Bud, 10(1): 26–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barua DN (1989) Science and practice in tea culture. Tea Research Association, Calcutta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barua DN, Dutta KN (1971) Distribution of shoots on the plucking surface of a tea bush and its relation to spacing: Part I. Two and A Bud, 18: 8–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barua PK (1965) Classification of the tea plant species hybrids. Two and A Bud, 12: 13–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezbaruah HP (1967a) Cytogenetics and breeding of tea. Proceedings of 23rd Tocklai Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezbaruah HP (1967b) Some thoughts on tea breeding at Tocklai. Two and A Bud, 14(1): 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezbaruah HP (1968) Genetic improvement of tea in N. E. India—its problems and possibilities. Indian Journal of Genetics, 28A: 126–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezbaruah HP (1969) Economics of a selection scheme. Proceedings of 24th Tocklai Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezbaruah HP (1971a) Preserve the valuable tea plants before they become extinct. Two and A Bud, 18(2): 20–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezbaruah HP (1971b) Cytological studies on Thea and related Camellia. PhD Thesis, Gauhati University, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezbaruah HP (1971c) Cytological investigations in the family Theaceae I. Chromosome number in some Camellia species and allied genera. Caryologia, 24(4): 421–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezbaruah HP (1974) Tea breeding—a review. Indian Journal of Genetics, 34A(S): 90–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezbaruah HP (1975) Tea breeding—a review. Two and A Bud, 22(2): 123–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezbaruah HP, Gogoi SC (1972) An interspecific hybrid between tea (Camellia sinensis L.) and C. japonica. Proceedings of Indian Academy of Science, 76: 219–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezbaruah HP, Dutta AC (1977) Tea germplasm collection at Tocklai Experimental Station. Two and A Bud, 24: 22–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezbaruah HP, Singh ID (1978) Current status of tea germplasm in India. Proceedings of National Symposium: Plant and Animal Genetic Resources. 28–30 December, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borchetia S, Das SC, Handique PJ, Das S (2009) High multiplication frequency and genetic stability in the three varieties of tea plants (Camellia spp.) through RAPD and microsatellite markers. Scientia Horticulturae, 120: 544–550.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • China Tea Varieties Compilation Committee (2001) China Tea Varieties. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific and Technical Publishers, p.9 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen Stuart CP (1929) Researches on the leaf-yielding capacity of tea plants. Arch Theecult Ned Ind, 3: 245–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen Stuart CP (1930) Researches on leaf-yielding capacity of tea plants. Arch Theecult Ned Ind, 3: 276–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das SC (1984) Rate of leaf unfolding in plucked and unplucked clonal tea bushes of North East India. Two and A Bud, 31: 7–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das SC, Barman TS (1988a) Current state and future potential of tissue culture in tea. Proceedings of 30th Tocklai Conference, pp.90–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das SC, Barman TS (1988b) Tea shoots regeneration from embryo callus. In: Subba Rao NS, Balagopalan C, Ramakrishna SV (eds.) New Trends in Biotechnology, 3–4 June, 1988, Trivandrum, New Delhi: Oxford & IBH Co. Pvt. Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das SC, Barman TS, Singh R (1990) Tissue culture of tea: Plant regeneration and establishment in the nursery. Proceedings of International Conference on Tea Research: Global Perspective. 11–12 January, 1990, Tea Research Association, Calcutta, pp.19–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das SC, Bordoloi SC, Bordoloi RK, Sarma AK, Dutta RK, Dutta PK, Ubhadia IB, Goswami BK, Barua DC (2005) Cleft grafting as tool for tea improvement. In: Proceedings of the 34th Tocklai Conference on “Strategies” for Quality 28–30 November, 2005, Tocklai Experimental Station, Tea Research Association, Jorhat, pp.222–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (2006–2008) Http://faostat.fao.org/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gogoi MN (1993) Black tea manufacture—The Principle and the Process Engineering Aspects. In: Lecture Course on Manufacturing of Tea, August, 1993. Tocklai Experimental Station, Tea Research Association, Jorhat, pp.40–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green MJ (1971) An evaluation of some criteria used in selecting large-yielding tea clones. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 76: 143–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grice WJ (1969) A second progress report on the yield of tea clones receiving two levels of nitrogen at maturity. Two and A Bud, 31: 46–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harler CR (1964) The Culture and Marketing of Tea. (3rd Edition). London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazarika M (2008) Uniqueness of Assam Tea. In: Jain NK, Rahman F, Peter Baker (eds.) Economic Crisis in Tea Industry. LLC, USA: Studium Press, pp.265–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazarika M, Chakravorty SK, Mahanta PK (1984) Studies on thearubigin pigments in black tea manufacturing systems. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 35: 1208–1218.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hazarika M, Goswami MR, Tamuly P, Sabhapandit S, Barua S, Gogoi MN (2002) Quality management in tea: Biochemists review. Two and A Bud, 49: 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Tea Committee (ITC) (2009) Annual Bulletin of Statistics, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain JC, Ullah MR, Devchoudhury MN (1979) L-phenylalanine ammonia lyase activity. Two and A Bud, 26(2): 67.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jain SM, Das SC, Barman TS (1991) Induction ofroots from regenerated shoots of tea (Camelliasinensis L.). In: Mascherpa JM, Moncousin CH (eds.) InternationalSymposium on Plant Biotechnology and its Contribution to Plant Development, Multiplication and Improvement. Geneva, Switzerland. ActaHorticulturae, 289: 339–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitamura S (1950) Acta Phytotax and Geobot. Kyoto, 14: 56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konwar BK (1999) Biodiversity of tea in North East India and its conservation at Tocklai. Two and A Bud, 46(2): 7–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konwar BK, Bordoloi BJ, Dutta RK, Das SC (1999) Rooting of in vitro shoots and field establishment of tissue culture-derived tea plants. Two and A Bud, 6(2): 26–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd GB, McCown BH (1980) Commercially-feasible micropropagation of mountain laurel, Kalmia latifolia, by use of shoot-tip culture. Proceedings of International Plant Propagator’s Society, 30: 421–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mamedov MA (1961) Tea selection in Azerbaidzan. Agrobiologia, 1: 62–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters JW (1844) The Assam tea plant compared with the tea plant of China. Journal Agriculture and Horticulture Society of India, 3: 61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco cultures. Physiologia Plantarum, 15: 473–497.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts EAH (1962) Assessment of quality in teas by chemical analysis. Two and A Bud, 9(3): 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson GW (1963) On the nature of the enzyme catechol oxidase in tea. Tea Quarterly, 36: 103–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarmah PC, Bezbaruah HP (1984) Triploid breeding in tea. Two and A Bud, 31(2): 55–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satyanarayana N, Sarma VS (1982) Biometric basis for yield prediction-tea clonal selection. In: Proceedings of PLACROSYM-IV. Indian Society of Plantation Crops, pp.237–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satyanarayana N, Sharma VS (1986) Tea (Camellia L. spp.) germplasm in South India. In: Srivastava HC (eds.) Plantation crops. Vol. II. New Delhi: Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd., pp.173–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satyanarayana N, Sharma VS (1991) Tea plant improvement in South India. United Planters’ Association of Southern India, Scientific Department Bulletin, 44: 69–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satyanarayana N, Sharma VS (1993) An overview of tea plant improvement in South India. In: Tea Culture, Processing and Marketing, pp.36–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schenk RU, Hildebrandt AC (1972) Medium and techniques for induction and growth of monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plant cell cultures. Canadian Journal of Botany, 50: 199–204.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma VS (1976) V.P. tea nursery. Planters’ Chronicle, 71: 211–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh ID (1979) Indian tea germplasm and its contribution to the world tea industry. Two and A Bud, 26: 23–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh ID (1980a) Tea germplasm in India. Plant Genetic Resources News. FAO/IBPGR, Rome, 43: 12–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh ID (1980b) Non-conventional approaches to the breeding of tea in North-East India. Two and A Bud, 27: 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh ID (1984) Advances in tea breeding in North East India. In: Iyer RD (eds.) Proceedings of PLACROSYM-V. 15–18 December, 1982, Indian Society of Plantation Crops, CPCRI, Kasargod, pp.88–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh ID, Bezbaruah HP (1978) Collection of tea genetic resources-problems and procedures. Proceedings of National Symposium on Plant and Animal Genetic Resources, 28–30 December, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh ID, Sharma PC (1982) Studies on radiation breeding in the tea plant. In: Vishveshwaras (eds.) PLACROSYM-IV. Proceedings of 4th Annual Symposium on Plantation Crops: Genetics, Plant Breeding and Horticulture. 3–5 December, 1981, Mysore, pp.295–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh ID, Sharma PC, Bezbaruah HP (1982) Breeding tea polyploids. In: Vishveshwara S (eds.) PLACROSYM-IV. Proceedings of 4th Annual Symposium on Plantation Crops: Genetics, Plant Breeding and Horticulture. 3–5 December, 1981, Mysore, pp.74–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toyao T (1966) Studies on Koro tea I. The inheritance of Koro type characters and the estimation of the degree of selfing of the tea plant. Study of Tea, 32: 18–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toyao T, Katsuo K, Kayumi S, Matsushita S, Amma, S (1971). Improvements in the methods of early selection of black tea quality. Bulletin of Tea Research Station, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Japan, (7): 1–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tunstall AC (1931a) A note on the propagation of tea by green shoots cuttings. Quarterly Journal of Indian Tea Association, pp.49–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tunstall AC (1931b) Observations on the yield of individual bushes. Report of Indian Tea Association for 1930, pp.101–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ukers WH (1935) All about Tea. Vol. I. New York: Tea and Coffee Trade Journal Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkataramani KS (1963) The principles of tea clonal selection and propagation and some practical considerations in clonal planting. United Planters’ Association of South Indian, Scientific Department Bulletin, 22: 2–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkataramani KS, Padmanabhan TS (1964) A preliminary assessment of the relationship between certain leaf characteristics and cup quality. Annual Report United Planters Association of Southern India, Scientific Department, Tea Section, 1963–64: 50–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser T (1969) Tea. In: Ferwewerda FP, Wit F (eds.) Outlines of Perennial Crop Breeding in the Tropics. Wageningen: H. Veenman & Zonen, pp.459–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser T, Kehl FH (1958) Selection and vegetative propagation of tea. Tea Quarterly, 29: 76–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • White PR (1963) The cultivation of animal and plant cells (2nd Edition). New York: Ronald Press, p.228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wight W (1939) Annual report of Indian Tea Association. Scientific Department, Tocklai.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wight W (1955) Tea breeding in India. Two and A Bud, 2(3): 9–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wight W (1956) Commercial selection and breeding of tea in India. World Crop, 8: 263–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wight W (1958a) Selection policy in tea estates of North East India. Report of Tocklai Experimental Station, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wight W (1958b) The agrotype concept in tea taxonomy. Nature, 181: 893–895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wight W (1961) Combiners for tea breeding. Two and A Bud, 8(3): 19–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wight W (1962) Tea classification revised. Current Science, 31: 298–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wight W, Barua PK (1954) Morphological basis of quality in tea. Nature, 173: 630–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wight W, Barua PK (1957) What is tea? Nature, 179: 506–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wight W, Gilchrist RCJH (1961) The concept of kind of tea. Nature, 161: 14–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wight W, Gilchrist RCJH, Wight J (1963) Note on color and quality of a tea leaf. Empire Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 31(122): 124–126.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Zhejiang University Press, Hangzhou and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Das, S.C., Das, S., Hazarika, M. (2012). Breeding of the Tea Plant (Camellia sinensis) in India. In: Global Tea Breeding. Advanced Topics in Science and Technology in China. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31878-8_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics