Towards Opportunistic Service Composition in Dynamic Ad Hoc Environments

  • Christin Groba
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7221)


Service composition in pervasive computing envisions the collaboration of services provided by mobile and embedded devices to achieve complex application requirements. Although some research has investigated the composition of services in dynamic ad hoc settings, it is not clear how service composites manage the conflict between application layer complexities and network unreliability that may cause them to fail repeatedly. This paper outlines investigations on opportunistic service composition as a solution for managing complex service requests in mobile infrastructure-less environments. Opportunistic service composition dynamically transfers control among service providers to bind and execute services in a decentralised way. Unlike existing fragmentation and broker-based designs, it interleaves provider allocation with service execution to counteract mobility in a flexible manner. Early simulation results suggest that this approach reduces the failure probability and communication overhead of complex service requests. This illustrates that opportunistic service composition may be feasible to manage collaboration in dynamic ad hoc environments.


Service Provider Service Composition Service Composite Provider Selection Embed Device 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Catarci, T., de Leoni, M., Marrella, A., Mecella, M., Salvatore, B., Vetere, G., Dustdar, S., Juszczyk, L., Manzoor, A., Truong, H.L.: Pervasive software environments for supporting disaster responses. IEEE Internet Computing 12(1), 26–37 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chakraborty, D., Joshi, A., Finin, T., Yesha, Y.: Service composition for mobile environments. Mobile Networks and Applications 10, 435–451 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Groba, C., Clarke, S.: Opportunistic composition of sequentially-connected services in mobile computing environments. In: International Conference on Web Services (ICWS), pp. 17–24. IEEE (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Philips, E., Van Der Straeten, R., Jonckers, V.: NOW: A Workflow Language for Orchestration in Nomadic Networks. In: Clarke, D., Agha, G. (eds.) COORDINATION 2010. LNCS, vol. 6116, pp. 31–45. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schuler, C., Weber, R., Schuldt, H., Schek, H.J.: Scalable peer-to-peer process management - the osiris approach. In: International Conference on Web Services (ICWS), pp. 26–34. IEEE (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sen, R., Roman, G.-C., Gill, C.D.: CiAN: A Workflow Engine for MANETs. In: Wang, A.H., Zavattaro, G. (eds.) COORDINATION 2008. LNCS, vol. 5052, pp. 280–295. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yildiz, U., Godart, C.: Synchronization solutions for decentralized service orchestrations. In: International Conference on Internet and Web Applications and Services (ICIW), p. 39. IEEE (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yu, W.: Decentralized Orchestration of BPEL Processes with Execution Consistency. In: Li, Q., Feng, L., Pei, J., Wang, S.X., Zhou, X., Zhu, Q.-M. (eds.) APWeb/WAIM 2009. LNCS, vol. 5446, pp. 665–670. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christin Groba
    • 1
  1. 1.Lero Graduate School of Software Engineering, Distributed Systems Group, School of Computer Science and StatisticsTrinity College DublinIreland

Personalised recommendations