Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Representation of Earthquake Ground Motions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Modern Earthquake Engineering

  • 1922 Accesses

Abstract

It is noted that the most important parameters of an earthquake ground motions are its maximum motion, predominant period and effective durations [1]. However, different from other loadings, earthquake induced loading and ground motion cherish high uncertainties in these aspects, as well as, more broadly, on its occurrence, magnitude, frequency content and duration. The uncertainties come from many sources: the energy suddenly released during an earthquake is built up rather slowly through tectonic movements; historical records over a time span of a couple of hundred years do not provide a complete picture of the seismic hazard. Moreover, the rupture and faulting process during an earthquake is extremely complex and affected by many parameters that are difficult to predict [2].

Things should be made as simple as possible but not a bit simpler than that.

Albert Einstein (1879–1955)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Schnabel PB, Lysmer J, Seed HB (1972) SHAKE, a computer program for earthquake response analysis of horizontally layered sites. No. EERC 72-12, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, College of Engineering, University of California, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  2. Schuëller GI (1991) Structural dynamics, recent advances. Springer, Berlin

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Wilson Ed (2015) Termination of the response spectrum method (RSM), July 13, 2015

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jia Junbo (2014) Essentials of applied dynamic analysis. Springer, Heidelberg

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Yue QJ, Qu Y, Bi XJ, Kärnä T (2007) Ice force spectrum on narrow conical structures. Cold Reg Sci Technol 49(2):161–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Schuster Arthur (1898) On the investigation of hidden periodicities with application to a supposed 26 day period of meterological phenomena. Terrestr. Magnet. 3:13–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Schuster Arthur (1900) The periodogram of magnetic declination as obtained from the records of Greenwich Observatory during the years 1871–1895. Trans Camb Philos Soc 18:107–135

    Google Scholar 

  8. Schuster Arthur (1906) The periodogram and its optical analogy. Proc R Soc Lond Ser A 77:136–140

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Izuru Takewaki (2007) Critical excitation methods in earthquake engineering, 1st edn. Elsevier Science, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  10. Brune JN (1970) Tectonic stress and the spectra of seismic shear waves from earthquakes. J Geophys Res 75:4997–5009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Brune JN (1971) Correction. J Geophys Res 76:5002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hanks TC (1982) f max. Bull Seismol Soc Am 72:1867–1879

    Google Scholar 

  13. Papageorgiou AS, Aki K (1983) A specific barrier for the quantitative description of inhomogeneous faulting and the prediction of strong ground motion. II. Applications of the model. Bull Seismol Soc Am 73:953–978

    Google Scholar 

  14. Weisstein EW (2011) Maximum entropy method, MathWorld—a Wolfram web resource

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wilson JF (2003) Dynamics of offshore structures. Wiley, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chopra AK (2000) Dynamics of structures: theory and application to earthquake engineering, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kramer SL (1996) Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kanai K (1967) Semi-empirical formula for the seismic characteristics of the ground. Bull Earthq Res Inst Univ Tokyo 35:309–325

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tajimi H (1960) A statistical method of determining the maximum response of a building structure during an earth-quake. In: Proceedings of the second world conference on earthquake engineering, vol 2, pp 781–798

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kubo T, Penzien J (1979) Simulation of three-dimensional strong ground motions along principal axes. San Fernando Earthq Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 7:265–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Moustafa Abbas (2010) Identification of resonant earth-quake ground motion. Sӑdhanӑ (Indian Academy of Science) 5(3):355–371

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Kanaji H, Hamada N, Naganuma T (2005) Seismic retrofit of a cantilever truss bridge in the Hanshin expressway. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on earthquake engineering

    Google Scholar 

  23. Chen G, Wu J (2001) Optimal placement of multiple tuned mass dampers for seismic structures. J Struct Eng ASCE 127(9):1054–1062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Li C, Liu Y (2004) Ground motion dominant frequency effect on the design of multiple tuned mass dampers. J Earthq Eng 8(1):89–105

    Google Scholar 

  25. Clough RW, Penzien J (1993) Dynamics of structures, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Der Kiureghian A, Neuenhofer A (1992) Response spectrum method for multi-support seismic excitations. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 21:713–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bessason B (1992) Assessment of earthquake loading and response of seismically isolated bridges. PhD thesis, MTA-rapport 1991: 88, Norges Tekniske Høgskole, Trondheim

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hanks TC, McGuire RK (1986) The character of high frequency strong ground motion in space and time. Eng Mech 112:154–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Boore DM (1983) Stochastic simulation of high frequency ground motions based on seismological models of the radiated spectra. Bull Seismol Soc Am 73(6):1865–1894

    Google Scholar 

  30. Herman RB (1985) Letter to the editor? An extension of random vibration theory estimates of strong ground motion to large distances. Bull Seismol Soc Am 75(5):1447–1453

    Google Scholar 

  31. Biot MA (1932) Transient oscillations in elastic systems. PhD thesis No. 259, Aeronautics Department, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, USA

    Google Scholar 

  32. Biot MA (1943) Analytical and experimental methods in engineering seismology. Trans ASCE 108(1):365–385

    Google Scholar 

  33. Suyehiro K (1926) A seismic vibration analyzer and the records obtained therewith, vol 1. Bulletin of the Earthquake Research Institute, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  34. Housner GW (1941) An investigation of the effects of earthquakes on buildings. PhD thesis, California Institute of Technology

    Google Scholar 

  35. Housner GW, Martel RR, Alford JL (1953) Spectrum analysis of strong motion earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 43(2):97–119

    Google Scholar 

  36. NEHRP (2009) NEHRP Recommended provisions for new buildings and other structures (FEMA P-750), 2009 ed. Building Seismic Safety Council, National Institute of Building Sciences, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  37. ASCE 7-05 (2006) Minimum design loads for buildings and others structures. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA

    Google Scholar 

  38. Kumar M, Stafford PJ, Elghazouli AY (2013) Influence of ground motion characteristics on drift demands in steel moment frames designed to Eurocode 8. Eng Struct 52:502–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kumar M, Stafford PJ, Elghazouli AY (2013) Seismic shear demands in multi-storey steel frames designed to Eurocode 8. Eng Struct 52:69–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Brunesi E, Nascimbene R, Casagrande L (2016) Seismic analysis of high-rise mega-braced frame-core buildings. Eng Struct 115:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Clough RW, Benuska KL, Wilson El (1965) Inelastic earthquake response of tall buildings. In: Third world conference on earthquake engineering, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  42. Chen WF, Lui EM (2006) Earthquake engineering for structural design, 1st edn. CRC Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  43. Baker JW, Cornell CA (2005) A vector-valued ground motion intensity measure consisting of spectral acceleration and epsilon. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 34(10):1193–1217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Baker JW, Cornell CA (2006) Spectral shape, epsilon and record selection. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 35(9):1077–1095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. ISO19901-2 (2004) Petroleum and natural gas industries—specific requirements for offshore structures—part 2: seismic design procedures and criteria

    Google Scholar 

  46. Eurocode 8 (2004) Design of structures for earthquake resistance—part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings

    Google Scholar 

  47. NORSAR (1998) Seismic zonation for Norway, prepared for Norwegian Council for Building Standardization by NORSAR and Norwegian Geotechnical Institute

    Google Scholar 

  48. Gazetas G (2006) Seismic design of foundations and soil–structure interaction. In: First European conference on earthquake engineering and seismology, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  49. Mylonakis G, Gazetas G, Nikolaou A, Michaelides O (2000) The role of soil on the collapse of 18 piers of the elevated Hanshin Expressway in the Kobe earthquake. In: Proceedings of the 12th world conference on earthquake engineering, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  50. Iervolino I, Cornell CA (2005) Record selection for nonlinear seismic analysis of structures. Earthq Spectra 3:685–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Newmark NM, Blume JA, Kapur KK (1973) Seismic design spectra for nuclear power plants. J Power Div 99(2):287–303

    Google Scholar 

  52. NORSOK Standard N-003 (2004) Actions and action effects, Rev. 2, Oct 2004

    Google Scholar 

  53. ICC (2007) Standards Australia, structural design actions—earthquake actions in Australia, AS 1170.4-2007, Sydney, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  54. China Net for Engineering Construction Standardization (2010) Code for Seismic Design of Buildings, GB 50011-2010. China Building Industry Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  55. International Code Council (ICC) (2006) International building code, 5th edn. ICC, Falls Church, VA

    Google Scholar 

  56. Building Seismic Safety Council (BSSC) (2009) NEHRP recommended seismic provisions for new buildings and other structures. Rep. FEMA P-750, FEMA, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  57. Rodriguez-Marek AR, Bray JD, Abrahamson NA (2001) An empirical geotechnical seismic site response procedure. Earthq Spectra 17(1):65–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Anbazhagan P, Parihar A, Rashmi HN (2011) Amplification based on shear wave velocity for seismic zonation: comparison of empirical relations and site response results for shallow engineering bedrock sites. Geomech Eng 3(3):189–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Anbazhagan P, Sheikh N, Parihar A (2013) Influence of rock depth on seismic site classification for shallow bedrock regions. Nat Hazards Rev 14(2):108–121

    Google Scholar 

  60. Lee VW, Trifunac MD, Todorovska M, Novikova EI (1995) Empirical equations describing attenuation of peaks of strong ground motion, in terms of magnitude, distance, path effects and site conditions. Rep. No. CE 95-02, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Southern California, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  61. Kokusho T, Sato K (2008) Surface-to-base amplification evaluated from KiK-net vertical array strong motion records. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 28(9):707–716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Anbazhagan P, Sheikh MN, Tsang HH (2010) Seismic site classification practice in Australia, China and India, suitability. In: Abraham R, Latheswary S, Unnikrishnan N (eds) International conference on materials mechanics and management, New Delhi, pp 189–197

    Google Scholar 

  63. Boore DM (2004) Estimating V s (30) (or NEHRP site classes) from shallow velocity models. Bull Seismol Soc Am 94(2):591–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Atkinson GM, Boore DM (2003) Empirical ground-motion relations for subduction-zone earthquakes and their application to Cascadia and other regions. Bull Seismol Soc Am 93:1703–1729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Boore DM, Joyner WB, Fumal TE (1997) Equations for estimating horizontal response spectra and peak acceleration from western North American earthquakes: a summary of recent work. Seismol Res Lett 68(1):128–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Dobry R, Iai S (2000) Recent developments in the understanding of earthquake site response and associated seismic code implementation. In: Proceedings of GeoEng2000, international conference on geotechnical & geological engineering, Melbourne, Australia, pp 186–129

    Google Scholar 

  67. Dobry R, Ramos R, Power MS (1997) Site factors and site categories in seismic codes: a perspective. In: Power MS, Mayes RL (eds) Proceedings of the NCEER Workshop on the national representation of seismic ground motion for new and existing highway facilities, Report NCEER-97-0010, May 29–30, San Francisco, pp 137–170

    Google Scholar 

  68. Papageorgiou AS, Kim J (1991) Study of the propagation and amplification of seismic waves in Caracas Valley with reference to the 29 July 1967 earthquake: SH waves. Bull Seismol Soc Am 81(6):2214–2233

    Google Scholar 

  69. Chang SW, Bray JD (1995) Seismic response of deep, stiff soil deposits in the Oakland, California area during the Loma Prieta earthquake. Report. No. UCB/GT/95-06, Geotechnical Engineering, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Berkeley, California

    Google Scholar 

  70. Motosaka M, Nagano M (1997) Analysis of amplification characteristics of ground motions in the heavily damaged belt zone during the 1995 Hyogo-ken Nanbu earthquake. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 26(3):377–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Bozorgnia Y, Mahin SA, Brady AG (1998) Vertical response of 12 structures recorded during the Northridge earthquake. Earthq Spectra 14:411–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Richter CF (1958) Elementary seismology. WH Freeman and Company, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  73. Papazoglou AJ, Elnashai AS (1996) Analytical and field evidence of the damaging effect of vertical earthquake ground motion. J Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 25(10):1109–1137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Elgamal AW, Liangcai H (2004) Vertical earthquake motions records: an overview. J Earthq Eng 8(5):663–697

    Google Scholar 

  75. Bozorgnia Y, Campbell KW (2004) The vertical to horizontal response spectral ratio and tentative procedures for developing simplified V/H and vertical design spectra. J Earthq Eng 8:175–207

    Google Scholar 

  76. Bozorgnia Y, Campbell K (2016) Ground motion model for the vertical-to-horizontal (V/H) ratios of PGA, PGV, and response spectra

    Google Scholar 

  77. Kalkan Erol, Graizer Vladimir (2007) Multi-component ground motion response spectra for coupled horizontal, vertical, angular accelerations and tilt. ISET J Earthq Technol 44(1):259–284 (Paper No. 485)

    Google Scholar 

  78. Akkar S, Sandikkaya MA, Ay BO (2014) Compatible ground-motion prediction equations for damping scaling factors and vertical to horizontal spectral amplitude ratios for the broader European region. Bull Earthq Eng 12:517–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Gülerce Z, Abrahamson NA (2011) Site specific design spectra for vertical ground motion. Earthq Spectra 27:1023–1047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Bommer JJ, Akkar S, Kale Ö (2011) Model for vertical to horizontal response spectral ratios for Europe and the Middle East. Bull Seismol Soc Am 101(4):1783–1806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Bozorgnia Y, Campbell K (2004) Vertical to horizontal response spectra ratio and tentative procedures for developing simplified V/H and vertical design spectra. J Earthq Eng 8(2):175–207

    Google Scholar 

  82. NORSAR, Risk Engineering, Inc. (1991) Ground motions from earthquake on Norwegian continental shelf. Summary report, Report for Operatørkomite Nord (OKN), Stavanger, Norway

    Google Scholar 

  83. GB 50267-97 (1998) Code for seismic design of nuclear power plants. Ministry of Construction of People’s Republic of China

    Google Scholar 

  84. ISO19901-2 (2016) Petroleum and natural gas industries—specific requirements for offshore structures—part 2: seismic design procedures and criteria, 2nd edn

    Google Scholar 

  85. JTG/T B02-01-2008 (2008) Guidelines for seismic design of high bridges. Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China

    Google Scholar 

  86. Belstsos AS, Newmark NM (1960) Effect of inelastic behaviour on the rersponse of simple systems to earthquake motions. In: Proceedings of the second world conference on earthquake engineering, Tokyo, pp 895–912

    Google Scholar 

  87. Penzien J (1960) Elasto-plastic response of idealized multi-story structures subjected to a strong motion earthquake. In: Proceedings of the second world conference on earthquake engineering

    Google Scholar 

  88. Berg GV, Thomaides SS (1960) Energy consumption by structures in strong motion earthquakes. In: Proceedings of the second world conference on earthquake engineering

    Google Scholar 

  89. Naeim F (2001) The seismic design handbook, 2nd edn. Kluwer Academic Publisher, USA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  90. Wakabayashi M (1980) Design of earthquake resistant buildings. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  91. Blume JA, Newmark NM, Corning L (1961) Design of multistory reinforced concrete buildings for earthquake motions. Portland Cement Association, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  92. Clough RW (1955) On the importance of higher modes of vibration in the earthquake response of a tall building. Bull Seismol Soc Am 45(4):289–301

    Google Scholar 

  93. International Association of Oil and Gas Producers (2014) Reliability of offshore structures—current design and potential inconsistencies. OGP Report No. 486

    Google Scholar 

  94. Spudich P, Chiou BSJ (2008) Directivity in NGA earthquake ground motions: analysis using isochrone theory. Earthq Spectra 24:279–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Lin YK, Zhang R, Yong Y (1990) Multiply supported pipeline under seismic wave excitations. J Eng Mech ASCE 116:1094–1108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Boore DM, Bommer JJ (2005) Processing of strong motion accelerograms: needs, options and consequences. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 25:93–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Akkar Sinan, Boore DM (2009) On baseline corrections and uncertainty in response spectra for baseline variations commonly encountered in digital accelerograph records. Bull Seismol Soc Am 99(3):1671–1690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Boore DM (2001) Effect of baseline corrections on displacements and response spectra for several recordings of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 91:1199–1211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. www.seismosoft.com

  100. Iwan WD, Moser MA, Peng CY (1985) Some observations on strongmotion earthquake measurement using a digital accelerograph. Bull Seismol Soc Am 75:1225–1246

    Google Scholar 

  101. Yang J, Li JB, Lin G (2006) A simple approach to integration of acceleration data for dynamic soil–structure interaction analysis. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 26:725–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Zhou Y, Zhang W, Yu H (1997) Analysis of long-period error for accelerograms recorded by digital seismographs. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 17(2):1–9 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  103. Gupta VK (2009) Wavelet-based random vibrations in earthquake engineering (lecture). IIT Kanpur, India

    Google Scholar 

  104. Gaupillaud P, Grossmann A, Morlet J (1984) Cycle-octave and related transforms in seismic signal analysis. Geo-exploration 23:85–102

    Google Scholar 

  105. Pradeep N (2011) Analyzing the effect of moving resonance on seismic response of structures using wavelet transforms. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

    Google Scholar 

  106. Heidari A, Salajegheh E (2008) Wavelet analysis for processing of earthquake. Asian J Civil Eng (Build Hous) 9(5):513–524

    Google Scholar 

  107. Li Hongnan, Yi Tinghua, Ming Gu, Huo Linsheng (2009) Evaluation of earthquake-induced structural damages by wavelet transform. Prog Nat Sci 19(4):461–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. Chanerley AA, Alexander NA (2010) Obtaining estimates of the low-frequency “fling”, instrument tilts and displacement timeseries using wavelet decomposition. Bull Earthq Eng 8(2):231–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. Zhou T, Li Z, Jia J, Jia Z (2003) Dynamic response analysis of isolated seismic foundation structure under earthquake motion using wavelet transformation. Ind Constr 33(6):21–23

    Google Scholar 

  110. Atik L, Abrahamson N (2010) An improved method for nonstationary spectral matching. Earthq Spectra 26(3):601–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. Koduru SD (2010) Influence of spectral nonstationarity on structural damage. In: Proceedings of the ninth US National and 10th Canadian conference on earthquake engineering, vol 8

    Google Scholar 

  112. Cao H, Friswell M (2009) The effect of energy concentration of earthquake ground motions on the nonlinear response of RC structures. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 29(2):292–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. Albert B, Francis JN (2009) A first course in wavelet with Fourier analysis. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  114. Bhattacharya S, Tokimatsu K, Goda K, Sarkar R, Shadlou M, Rouholamin M (2014) Collapse of Showa Bridge during 1964 Niigata earthquake: a quantitative reappraisal on the failure mechanisms. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 65:55–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  115. Kudo K, Uetake T, Kanno T (2008) Re-evaluation of nonlinear site response during the 1964 Niigata earthquake using the strong motion records at Kawagishi-cho, Niigata city. In: Proceedings of the 12th world conference on earthquake engineering

    Google Scholar 

  116. Yoshida N, Tazoh T, Wakamatsu K, Yasuda S, Towhata I, Nakazawa H, Kiku H (2007) Causes of Showa Bridge collapse in the 1964 Niigata earthquake based on eyewitness testimony. Soils Found 47(6):1075–1087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  117. Iyama J, Kuwamura H (1999) Application of wavelet to analysis and simulation of earthquake motions. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 28:255–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  118. Mukherjee S, Gupta K (2002) Wavelet-based characterization of design ground motions. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 31:1137–1190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  119. Zhou Z, Adeli H (2003) Wavelet energy spectrum for time–frequency localization of earthquake energy. Comput Aided Civil Infrastruct Eng 13:133–140

    Google Scholar 

  120. Suárez LE, Montejo LA (2005) Generation of artificial earthquakes via the wavelet transform. Int J Solids Struct 42(21–22):5905–5919

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  121. Chordati Amiri G, Asadi A (2008) New method for simulation earthquake records by using adapted wavelet. In: The 14th world conference on earthquake engineering, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Aker Solutions, Bergen, Norway

    Junbo Jia

Authors
  1. Junbo Jia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junbo Jia .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jia, J. (2017). Representation of Earthquake Ground Motions. In: Modern Earthquake Engineering . Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31854-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31854-2_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31853-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31854-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation