Advertisement

Balancing Destruction and Production in S-A Model-Based Hybrid RANS-LES for Flow around an Aerofoil with Mild Separation

  • Wei WangEmail author
  • Ning Qin
Part of the Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design book series (NNFM, volume 117)

Abstract

The flow around the Aérospatiale A-airfoil at the maximum lift condition with a chord Reynolds number of 2.0×106 is simulated using Unsteady Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stocks Simulation (URANS), Detached Eddy Simulation (DES), Delayed DES (DDES) and a new approach. The new approach (named WAD-DES) is based on the Spalart-Allmaras (S-A) model and has a weighted average of destruction terms from the Smagorinksy model and the S-A model. The aim of this study is to investigate the behaviour of the S-A-based model working as a sub-grid scale (SGS) model in simulating mild trailing edge separation. The results show that in the near-wall region WAD-DES is better than DES and comparable to DDES. In the wake region, WAD-DES provides the closest velocity profiles to those from the experimental data, due to a reduced level of modelled turbulent viscosity. It is shown that this new WAD-DES approach inherits the advantages of DDES in simulating shallow separation, and also increases the accuracy of prediction in regions further away from the wall.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Breuer, M., Jovicic, N., Mazaev, K.: Comparison of DES, RANS and LES for the separated flow around a flat plate at high incidence. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 41, 357–388 (2003)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Deck, S.: Zonal-Detached Eddy Simulation of the flow around a high-lift configuration. AIAA Journal 43(11), 2372–2384 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Durrani, N., Qin, N.: Behaviour of Detached-Eddy Simulations for mild trailing-edge separation. Journal of Aircraft 48(1) (January-February 2011)Google Scholar
  4. Gleyzes, C., Capbern, P.: Experimental study of two AIRBUS/ONERA airfoils in near stall conditions. Part I: Boundary layers. Aerospace Science and Technology 7, 439–449 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Houddeville, R., Piccin, O., Cassoudesalle, D.: Opération décrochage – mesurement de frottement sur profiles AS 239 et A 240 à la soufflerie F1 du CFM. Technical Report RT-OA 19/5025 (RT-DERAT 19/5025 DN), ONERA (1987)Google Scholar
  6. Mellen, C.P., Frohlich, J., Rodi, W.: Lessons from the European LESFOIL project on LES of flow around an aerofoil. In: 40th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, January 14-17 (2002) AIAA 2002-0111Google Scholar
  7. Menter, F.R., Kuntz, M.: Adaptation of eddy-viscosity turbulence models to unsteady separated flow behind vehicles. In: McCallen, R., Browand, F., Ross, J. (eds.) Symposium on the Aerodynamics of Heavy Vehicles: Trucks, Buses and Trains, Springer, Berlin (2004)Google Scholar
  8. Potsdam, M., Pullian, T.: Turbulence modeling treatment for rotorcraft wakes. In: AHS Specialist’s Conference on Aeromechanics, January 23-25 (2008)Google Scholar
  9. Schmidt, S., Thiele, F.: Detached Eddy Simulation of Flow around A-Airfoil. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion 71, 261–278 (2003)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Shur, M., Spalart, P.R., Strelets, M.K., Travin, A.: Detached-eddy simulation of an airfoil at high angle of attack. In: Rodi, W., Laurence, D. (eds.) Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Engineering Turbulence Modelling and Measurements, pp. 669–678. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1999)Google Scholar
  11. Shur, M., Spalart, P.R., Strelets, M.K., Travin, A.: Modification of SA Subgrid model in DES aimed to prevent activation of the low-Re terms in LES mode. In: DES Workshop, St. Petersburg, Russia (July 2003)Google Scholar
  12. Smagorinsky, J.: General circulation experiments with the primitive equations. Monthly Weather Review 91(3), 99–164 (1963)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Spalart, P.: Strategies for turbulence modelling and simulations. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flows 21, 252–263 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Spalart, P.R., Jou, W.-H., Strelets, M., Allmaras, S.R.: Comments on the feasibility of LES for wings and on a Hybrid RANS/LES approach. In: Advances in DNS/LES, 1st AFOSR Int. Conf. on DNS/LES, August 4-8. Greyden Press, Columbus Ohio (1997)Google Scholar
  15. Spalart, P.R.: A new version of detached-eddy simulation, resistant to ambiguous grid densities. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 20, 181–195 (2006)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Xia, H., Qin, N.: Detached-eddy simulation for synthetic jets with moving boundaries. Modern Physics Letters B 19(28-29), 1429–1435 (2005)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations