Embedded DDES of 2D Hump Flow

  • R. PolettoEmail author
  • A. Revell
  • T. Craft
  • N. Ashton
Part of the Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design book series (NNFM, volume 117)


The present work aims to investigate the usage of embedded regions of turbulent flow simulation near to the point of separation; towards an approach whereby discrete regions of turbulent resolving techniques are used within a domain predominantly solved using the RANS equations. The common Delayed Detached Eddy Simulation (DDES) approach is here used to compute the flow around a 2D hump centred within a ‘full domain’ i.e. also incorporating an upstream section. Subsequently the domain length is reduced and the flow is started at two locations close to the separation point by means of unsteady turbulent inlet conditions. The Divergence Free Synthetic Eddy Method (DF-SEM) and its predecessor are tested for their ability to reproduce the original DDES results from the full domain. In the present case we aim to return a minimal disturbance from the full domain solution and thus herein we do not focus on the predictive accuracy of the selected DDES approach. The motivation for this technique is to provide guidance for the optimal reduction of embedded regions of turbulent simulation in complex applications; i.e. including multiple instances of separated flow. Some comments regarding computational expense of the method are also provided.


Large Eddy Simulation Inlet Condition RANS Model Turbulence Anisotropy RANS Simulation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Spalart, P., Jou, W., Strelets, M., Allmaras, S.: Comments on the feasibility of LES for wings, and on a hybrid RANS/LES approach (1997)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Spalart, P., Deck, S., Shur, M., Squires, K., Strelets, M., Travin, A.: A new version of detached-eddy simulation, resistant to ambiguous grid densities. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics 20(3), 181–195 (2006)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Deck, S.: Zonal-Detached-Eddy simulation of the flow around a High-Lift configuration. AIAA Journal 43(11), 2372–2384 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tabor, G., Baba-Ahmadi, M.: Inlet conditions for large eddy simulation: A review. Computers & Fluids 39(4), 553–567 (2010)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jarrin, N., Prosser, R., Uribe, J., Benhamadouche, S., Laurence, D.: Reconstruction of turbulent fluctuations for hybrid RANS/LES simulations using a Synthetic-Eddy method. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow 30(3), 435–442 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pamiès, M., Weiss, P.-É., Garnier, E., Deck, S., Sagaut, P.: Generation of synthetic turbulent inflow data for large eddy simulation of spatially evolving wall-bounded flows. Physics of Fluids 21(4), 45103 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Poletto, R., Revell, A., Craft, T., Jarrin, N.: Divergence free synthetic eddy method for embedded LES inflow boundary conditions. In: Seventh International Symposium On Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena (TSFP-7), Ottawa (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Spalart, P., Allmaras, S.: One-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows. Recherche Aerospatiale (1), 5–21 (1994)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Menter, F.R.: Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA J. 32, 1598–1605 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Greenblatt, D., Paschal, K., Schaeffler, N., Washburn, A.E., Harris, J., Yao, C.S.: A separation control CFD validation test case. part 1: Baseline and steady suction. AIAA Paper (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Moser, R.D., Kim, J., Mansour, N.N.: Direct numerical simulation of turbulent channel flow up to re_\tau = 590. Physics of Fluids 11(4), 943–945 (1999)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanical Aerospace and Civil EngineeringThe University of ManchesterManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations