Advertisement

Environmental Aspects Selection for EEE Using ANP Method

  • İlke Bereketli
  • Mujde Erol Genevois
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 300)

Abstract

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a tool to assess the environmental aspects, impacts and resources used throughout a product’s life cycle. It is widely accepted and considered as one of the most powerful tools to support decision making processes used in ecodesign. However, since LCA is a cost and time intensive method, the companies do not intend to carry out a full LCA, except for large corporate ones. Especially for small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs), which do not have enough budget for and knowledge on ecodesign approaches, focusing only on the most important possible environmental aspect is unavoidable. In this direction, finding the right environmental aspect to work on is crucial. In this study, a multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methodology to select environmental aspects for Electrical and Electronic Equipment (EEE) by using Analytic Network Process (ANP) is proposed. The evaluation is made by ANP in order to create a realistic approach to inter-dependencies among the criteria.

Keywords

ANP Environmental aspect selection Environmental impacts LCA Electrical and Electronic Equipment Small and Medium Sized Enterprises (SMEs) 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Byggeth, S., Hochschorner, E.: Handling trade-offs in ecodesign tools for sustainable product development and procurement. Journal of Cleaner Production 14(15-16), 1420–1430 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Directive 2002/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 January 2003 on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment, RoHS (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Directive 2002/96/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 January 2003 on waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE). Official Journal of the European Union, L 37(24-38) (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Directive 2009/125/EC of The European Parliament and of The Council of 21 October 2009 establishing a framework for the setting of ecodesign requirements for energy-related products (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ernzer, M., Lindahl, M., Masui, K., Sakao, T.: An International Study on Utilizing of Design Environmental Methods (DfE)–a pre-study. In: Proc. of Third International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing, pp. 124–131. IEEE Computer Society (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Knight, P., Jenkins, J.O.: Adopting and applying eco-design techniques: a practitioners perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production 17, 549–558 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wanyama, W., Ertas, A., Zhang, H.-C., Ekwaro-Osire, S.: Life-cycle engineering: issues, tools and research. Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing 16(4-5), 307–316 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Karlsson, R., Luttropp, C.: EcoDesign: what’s happening? An overview of the subject area of EcoDesign and of the papers in this special issue. Journal of Cleaner Production 14, 1291–1298 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Finnveden, G., Hauschild, M.Z., Ekvall, T., Guinee, J., Heijungs, R., Hellweg, S., Koehler, A., Pennington, D., Suh, S.: Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment. Journal of Environmental Management 91, 1–21 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pigosso, D.C.A., Zanette, E.T., Filho, A.G., Ometto, A.R., Rozenfeld, H.: Ecodesign methods focused on remanufacturing. Journal of Cleaner Production 18, 21–31 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    ISO 14040, Environmental management: Life cycle assessment, Principles and guidelines. ISO 14040:2006 (E) (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Widmer, R., Oswald-Krapf, H., Sinha-Khetriwal, D., Schnellmann, M., Böni, H.: Global perspectives on e-waste. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 25, 436–458 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tsydenova, O., Bengtsson, M.: Chemical hazards associated with treatment of waste electrical and electronic equipment. Waste Management 31, 45–58 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Saaty, T.L.: Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process, 2nd edn. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh (2001)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Guinee, J.B.: Handbook on Life Cycle Assessment: Operational Guide to the ISO Standards. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands (2002)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hauschild, M., Jeswiet, J., Alting, L.: From life cycle as-sessment to sustainable production: Status and perspectives. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology 54(2), 1–21 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Environmental Protection Agency; EMS Implementation Guide for the Shipbuilding and Ship Repair Industry; Module 5 (2003), http://www.epa.gov/sectors/sectorinfo/sectorprofiles/shipbuilding/module_05.pdf
  18. 18.
    Rebitzer, G., Ekvall, T., Frischknecht, R., Hunkeler, D., Norris, G., Rydberg, T., Schmidt, W.-P., Suh, S., Weidema, B.P., Pennington, D.W.: Life cycle assessment Part 1: Framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications. Environment International 30, 701–720 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Collado-Ruiz, D., Ostad-Ahmad-Ghorabi, H.: Fuon theory: Standardizing functional units for product design. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 54(10), 683–691 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gonzalez, B., Adenso-Diaz, B., Gonzalez-Torre, P.L.: A fuzzy logic approach for the impact assessment in LCA. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 37, 61–79 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hermann, B.G., Kroeze, C., Jawjit, W.: Assessing environmental performance by combining life cycle assessment, multi-criteria analysis and environmental performance indicators. Journal of Cleaner Production 15, 1787–1796 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Soares, S.R., Toffoletto, L., Deschenes, L.: Development of weighting factors in the context of LCIA. Journal of Cleaner Production 14, 649–660 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Saaty, T.L.: The Analytical Hierarchy Process. McGraw Hill, New York (1981)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sarkis, J.: Evaluating environmentally conscious business practices. European Journal of Operational Research 107(1), 159–174 (1998)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    ISO 14001, Environmental management systems - Requirements with guidance for use. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva. EN ISO 14001:2004 (2004)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Environmental Protection Agency, Life Cycle Assessment: Principles and Practice, EPA/600/R-92/245, Cincinnati, Ohio (May 2006)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Roy, P., Nei, D., Orikasa, T., Xu, Q., Okadome, H., Nakamura, N., Shiina, T.: A review of life cycle as-sessment (LCA) on some food products. Journal of Food Engineering 90, 1–10 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • İlke Bereketli
    • 1
  • Mujde Erol Genevois
    • 1
  1. 1.Industrial Engineering DepartmentGalatasaray UniversityBesiktasTurkey

Personalised recommendations