Some Comments to the Fuzzy Version of the Arrow-Sen Theorem

  • Davide Martinetti
  • Susana Montes
  • Susana Díaz
  • Bernard De Baets
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 300)


The Arrow-Sen Theorem is one of the most important results concerning rationality of choice functions. It states that under suitable hypothesis, several definitions of rationality given by different authors can be considered equivalent. Following the same spirit, other authors have proved that further definitions can also be considered equivalent to rationality. In this work we consider the fuzzy version of this problem, using the most general definition of fuzzy choice function possible. Older results are recalled and in many cases improved and also new theorems are proposed.


Fuzzy choice function revealed preference rationality Arrow-Sen Theorem 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Arrow, K.J.: Rational choice functions and orderings. Economica 26, 121–127 (1959)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Banerjee, A.: Fuzzy preferences and arrow-type problems in social choice. Social Choice and Welfare 11, 121–130 (1994)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cutello, V., Montero, J.: Equivalence and compositions of fuzzy rationality measures. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 85, 31–43 (1997)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cutello, V., Montero, J.: Fuzzy rationality measures. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 62, 39–54 (1994)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Georgescu, I.: Fuzzy choice functions, A revealed Preference Approach. Springer, Berlin (2007)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jenei, J.: Continuity of left-continuous triangular norms with strong induced negations and their boundary condition. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 124, 35–41 (2001)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Maes, K.C., De Baets, B.: Rotation-invariant t-norms: the rotation invariance property revisited. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 160, 44–51 (2009)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Richter, M.K.: Revealed preference theory. Econometrica 34, 635–645 (1966)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Samuelson, P.A.: A note on the pure theory of consumer’s behavior. Economica 5, 61–71 (1938)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sen, A.: Quasi-transitivity, rational choice and collective decisions. The Review of Economic Studies 36, 381–393 (1969)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sen, A.: Choice function and revealed preference. Review of Economic Studies 38, 307–317 (1971)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Suzumura, K.: Rational choice and revealed preference. Review of Economic Studies 43, 149–159 (1976)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wu, C., Wang, W., Hao, Y.: A further study on rationality conditions of fuzzy choice functions. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 176, 1–19 (2011)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Davide Martinetti
    • 1
  • Susana Montes
    • 1
  • Susana Díaz
    • 1
  • Bernard De Baets
    • 2
  1. 1.Dept. Statistics and O.R.University of OviedoOviedoSpain
  2. 2.Dept. Appl. Math., Biometrics and Process ControlUniversity of GhentGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations