An Extended Version of the Fuzzy Multicriteria Group Decision-Making Method in Evaluation Processes

  • Macarena Espinilla
  • Jie Lu
  • Jun Ma
  • Luis Martínez
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 297)


Evaluation processes are a key element used in quality inspection, marketing and other fields in industrial companies. In these processes, it is very common that a group of evaluators assess a set of evaluated elements, according to a set of criteria, which may have different nature and usually present uncertainty. In this context, the fuzzy multicriteria group decision-making (FMCGDM) method has been successfully applied to different evaluation problems. This method provides a closeness coefficient of each evaluated element in order to generate a final raking. However, its applications to complex evaluation processes that requires the understandability of the closeness coefficient drive us to propose the use of the linguistic 2-tuple representation model to extend the FMCGDM method, in order to provide linguistic closeness coefficients, which are easy to understand. Moreover, we apply the extended version of the FMCGDM method in an evaluation process of fabric hand.


Fuzzy Number Linguistic Term Triangular Fuzzy Number Relevance Degree Closeness Coefficient 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Chen, C.H.: Extensions of the topsis for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 114, 1–9 (2000)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Espinilla, M., Liu, J., Martínez, L.: An extended hierarchical linguistic model for decision-making problems. Computational Intelligence 27(3), 489–512 (2011)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Herrera, F., Martínez, L.: A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 8(6), 746–752 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Herrera, F., Martínez, L., Sánchez, P.J.: Managing non-homogeneous information in group decision making. European Journal of Operational Research 166(1), 115–132 (2005)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Li, D.F.: A fuzzy closeness approach to fuzzy multi-attribute decision making. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making 6, 237–254 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lu, J., Ma, J., Zhang, G., Zhu, Y., Zeng, X., Koehl, L.: Theme-based comprehensive evaluation in new product development using fuzzy hierarchical criteria group decision-making method. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 58(6), 2236–2246 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lu, J., Zhu, Y., Zeng, X., Koehl, L., Ma, J., Zhang, G.: A linguistic multi-criteria group decision support system for fabric hand evaluation. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making 8, 395–413 (2009)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ma, J., Lu, J., Zhang, G.: Decider: A fuzzy multi-criteria group decision support system. Knowledge-Based Systems 23(1), 23–31 (2010)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Martínez, L.: Sensory evaluation based on linguistic decision analysis. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 44(2), 148–164 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Martínez, L., Ruan, D., Herrera, F.: Computing with words in decision support systems: An overview on models and applications. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems 3(4), 382–395 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mendel, J.M., Zadeh, L.A., Trillas, E., Yager, R.R., Lawry, J., Hagras, H., Guadarrama, S.: What computing with words means to me: Discussion forum. IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine 5(1), 20–26 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ruan, D., Lu, J., Laes, E., Zhang, G., Ma, J., Meskens, G.: Multi-criteria group decision support with linguistic variables in long-term scenarios for belgian energy policy. Journal of Universal Computer Science 16(1), 103–120 (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ruan, D., Zeng, X.: Intelligent Sensory Evaluation: Methodologies and Applications. Springer (2004)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yager, R.R.: On the retranslation process in zadeh’s paradigm of computing with words. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics 34(2), 1184–1195 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhang, G., Lu, J.: An integrated group decision-making method dealing with fuzzy preferences for alternatives and individual judgments for selection criteria. Group Decision and Negotiation 12(6), 501–515 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhang, T., Zhang, G., Ma, J., Lu, J.: Power distribution system planning evaluation by a fuzzy multi-criteria group decision support system. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems 3(4), 474–485 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Macarena Espinilla
    • 1
  • Jie Lu
    • 2
  • Jun Ma
    • 3
  • Luis Martínez
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer SciencesUniversity of JaénSpain
  2. 2.School of Software. Faculty of Engineering and Information TechnologyUniversity of Technology SydneyAustralia
  3. 3.SMART Infrastructure FacilityUniversity of WollongongAustralia

Personalised recommendations