Abstract
Viewed in the light of the remarkable performance of ‘Watson’ - IBMs proprietary artificial intelligence computer system capable of answering questions posed in natural language - on the US general knowledge quiz show ‘Jeopardy’, we review two experiments on formal systems - one in the domain of quantum physics, the other involving a pictographic languaging game - whereby behaviour seemingly characteristic of domain understanding is generated by the mere mechanical application of simple rules. By re-examining both experiments in the context of Searle’s Chinese Room Argument, we suggest their results merely endorse Searle’s core intuition: that ‘syntactical manipulation of symbols is not sufficient for semantics’. Although, pace Watson, some artificial intelligence practitioners have suggested that more complex, higher-level operations on formal symbols are required to instantiate understanding in computational systems, we show that even high-level calls to Google translate would not enable a computer qua ‘formal symbol processor’ to understand the language it processes. We thus conclude that even the most recent developments in ‘quantum linguistics’ will not enable computational systems to genuinely understand natural language.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aron, J.: Quantum links let computers understand language. The New Scientist 208(2790), 10–11 (2010)
Preston, J., Bishop, J.M. (eds.): Views into the Chinese room. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2002)
Bishop, J.M.: A view inside the Chinese room. Philosopher 28(4), 47–51 (2004)
Boden, M.: Escaping from the Chinese room. In: Boden, M. (ed.) The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence, pp. 89–105. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1988)
Cassirer, E.: An Essay on Man. Yale University Press, New Haven (1944)
Coecke, B.: Quantum Picturalism. Contemporary Physics 51, 59–83 (2010)
Harnad, S.: The Symbol Grounding Problem. Physica D 42, 335–346 (1990)
Harré, R., Wang, H.: Setting up a real ‘Chinese room’: an empirical replication of a famous thought experiment. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 11(2), 153–154 (1999)
Searle, J.R.: Minds, Brains, and Programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3(3), 417–457 (1980)
Schank, R.C., Abelson, R.P.: Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: an inquiry into human knowledge structures. Erlbaum, Hilsdale (1977)
Wittgenstein, L.: Philosophical Investigations. Blackwell, Oxford (1958)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag GmbH Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bishop, J.M., Nasuto, S.J., Coecke, B. (2013). ‘Quantum Linguistics’ and Searle’s Chinese Room Argument. In: Müller, V. (eds) Philosophy and Theory of Artificial Intelligence. Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, vol 5. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31674-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31674-6_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31673-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31674-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)