Skip to main content

Organisational Participation in Open Innovation Communities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Managing Open Innovation Technologies

Abstract

Organisational participation is a critical consideration in the examination of open communities. Many open communities are no longer the domain of solitary individuals but have come to include organisations representing many of the largest financial interests across a variety of economic interests. Organisations seek to participate in open communities for reasons of leveraged development, economics and flexibility but participation is not a simple task. In this chapter, we explore what the primary motivations are for organisational participation in open communities. We follow this with considerations of how organisations participate once they have determined to engage with open communities. This chapter provides a glimpse of why and how organisations participate in open innovation communities and provide insights valuable for both practical and academic interests.

This project was funded through the National Science Foundation VOSS—IOS Grant: 1122642, Organisational Participation in Open Communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ã…gerfalk, P., Fitzgerald, B., & Slaughter, S. (2009). Introduction to the special issue, flexible and distributed information systems development: state of the art and research challenges. Information Systems Research, 20(3), 317–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aksulu, A., & Wade, M. (2011). A comprehensive review and synthesis of open source research. Journal of Association for Information Systems, 11, 576–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organisational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organisation Science, 2(1), 40–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, J. (2006). Mertonianism unbound? imagining free, decentralised access to most cultural and scientific material. In C. Hess & E. Ostrom (Eds.), Understanding knowledge as a common: from theory to practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiasson, M., Germonprez, M., & Mathiassen, L. (2009). The conventional role of research methods in information systems action research. Information Systems Journal, 19, 31–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowston, K., Wei, K., Li, Q. & Howison, J. (2006). Core and Periphery in Free/Libre and Open Source Software Team Communications, In Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 6, 118a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davison, R., & Martinsons, M. (2002). Empowerment or enslavement? A case of process-based change in Hong Kong. Information Technology & People, 15(1), 42–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, B. (2006). The transformation of open source software. MIS Quarterly, 30(3), 587–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambardella, A., & Hall, B. (2006). Proprietary versus public domain licensing of software and research projects. Research Policy, 35, 875–892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Germonprez, M., Hovorka, D., & Collopy, F. (2007). A theory of tailorable technology design. Journal of the Association for Information Systems (JAIS), 8(6), 315–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henkel, J. (2006). Selective revealing in open innovation processes: The case of embedded linux. Research Policy, 35(7), 953–969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelty, C. (2009). Two bits: The cultural significance of free software. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuk, G. (2006). Strategic interaction and knowledge sharing in the KDE developer mailing list. Organisation Science, 52(7), 1031–1042.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakhani, K., & Wolf, R. (2005). Why hackers do what they do: understanding motivation and effort in free/open source software projects. In J. Feller, B. Fitzgerald, S. Hissam, & K. Lakhani (Eds.), Perspectives on free and open source software. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, A., & Baskerville, R. L. (2003). Generalizing generalizability in information systems research. Information Systems Research, 14(3), 221–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathiassen, L., Chiasson, M., & Germonprez, M. (2009). Compositional styles in action research: a critical analysis of leading information systems journals sprouts. Working Papers on Information Systems, 9(35).

    Google Scholar 

  • Neus, A., & Scherf, P. (2005). Opening minds: cultural change with the introduction of open-source collaboration methods. IBM Systems Journal, 44(2), 215–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sowe, S., Stamelos, I., & Angelis, L. (2008). Understanding knowledge sharing activities in free/open source software projects: an empirical study. The Journal of Systems and Software, 81(3), 431–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triole, J., & Lerner, J. (2002). Some simple economics of open source. Journal of Industrial Economics, 52, 197–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hippel, E., & von Krogh, G. (2003). Open source software and the ‘private-collective innovation model: issues for organisation science. Organisation Science, 14(2), 209–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, J., & Lakhani, K. (2008). Getting clear about communities in open innovation. Industry & Innovation, 15(2), 223–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • Lee, G., & Cole, R. (2003). From a firm-based to a community-based model of knowledge creation: The case of the Linux Kernel Development. Organisation Science, 14(6), 633–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, J., & Schankerman, M. (2010). The comingled code: Open source and economic development. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torker, R., Minoves, P., & Garrigós, J. (2011). Adopting free/libre/open source software practices, techniques and methods for industrial use. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 12(1), 88–122.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matt Germonprez .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Germonprez, M., Warner, B. (2013). Organisational Participation in Open Innovation Communities. In: Eriksson Lundström, J., Wiberg, M., Hrastinski, S., Edenius, M., Ågerfalk, P. (eds) Managing Open Innovation Technologies. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31650-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics