Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Managing Open Innovation Technologies pp 215–237Cite as

Open Strengths and Weaknesses of IT User Innovation: Evidence from Three Cases

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

The advent of the open innovation approach, together with the increased sophistication of new IT tools, has excited several researchers’ interest in user innovation. However, most such research remains fragmented and limited in its scope. The aim of the present study is to explore the role of IT throughout all the different phases of user innovation process and their associated advantages and disadvantages. In doing so, the study draws on material gleaned from three cases of companies in their attempt to integrate users and customers during the different phases of the innovation process. The study shows that IT tools are not enough rather they need to be complemented with more traditional modes of interactions and communications with their customers and users. This is all the more so as customers and users in other parts of the world differ with regard to their preferences, technical maturities and access to IT. The chapter ends with conclusions and some implications for theory and practice of open innovation technologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Awazu, Y., Baloh, P., Desouza, K. C., Wecht, C. H., Kim, J., & Jha, S. (2009). Information–communication technologies open up innovation. Research Technology Management, 52(1), 51–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. W. (2011a). Open services innovation: Rethinking your business to grow and compete in a new era. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Darke, P., Shanks, G., & Broadbent, M. (1998). Successfully completing case study research: combining rigour, relevance and pragmatism. Information Systems Journal, 8(4), 273–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Moor, K., Berte, K., De Marez, L., Joseph, W., Deryckere, T., & Martens, L. (2010). User-driven innovation? Challenges of user involvement in future technology analysis. Science & Public Policy (SPP), 37(1), 51–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desouza, K. C., Awazu, Y., Jha, S., Dombrowski, C., Papagari, S., Baloh, P., & Kim, J. Y. (2008). Customer-driven innovation. Research Technology Management, 51(3), 35–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Gangi, P. M., & Wasko, M. (2009). Steal my idea! Organizational adoption of user innovations from a user innovation community: A case study of dell ideastorm. Decision Support Systems, 48(1), 303–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodgson, M., Gann, D., & Salter, A. (2006). The role of technology in the shift towards open innovation: The case of Procter & Gamble. R&D Management, 36(3), 333–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebner, W., Leimeister, J. M., & Krcmar, H. (2009). Community engineering for innovations: The ideas competition as a method to nurture a virtual community for innovations. R&D Management, 39(4), 342–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Füller, J., Jawecki, G., & Muhlbacher, H. (2007). Innovation creation by online basketball communities. Journal of Business Research, 60(1), 60–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Füller, J., & Matzler, K. (2007). Virtual product experience and customer participation–a chance for customer-centred, really new products. Technovation, 27(6–7), 378–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gassmann, O., Enkel, E., & Chesbrough, H. (2010). The future of open innovation. R&D Management, 40(3), 213–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, S., Tarafdar, M., Cook, R., Maksimoski, R., & Rogowitz, B. (2008). Improving the front end of innovation with information technology. Research Technology Management, 51(3), 50–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyer, W. D., Chandy, R., Dorotic, M., Krafft, M., & Singh, S. S. (2010). Consumer cocreation in new product development. Journal of Service Research, 13(3), 283–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleemann, F., Voß, G. G., & Rieder, K. (2008). Un(der)paid innovators: The commercial utilization of consumer work through crowdsourcing. Science, Technology & Innovation Studies, 4(1), 5–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, T., Matzler, K., & Füller, J. (2009). Avatar-based innovation: Using virtual worlds for real-world innovation. Technovation, 29(6–7), 395–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazzarotti, V., & Manzini, R. (2009a). Different modes of open innovation: A theoretical framework and an empirical study. International Journal of Innovation Management, 13(4), 615–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leimeister, J. M., Huber, M., Bretschneider, U., & Krcmar, H. (2009). Leveraging crowdsourcing: Activation-supporting components for it-based ideas competition. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26(1), 197–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lettl, C. (2007a). User involvement competence for radical innovation. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 24(1–2), 53–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piller, F. T., & Walcher, D. (2006a). Toolkits for idea competitions: a novel method to integrate users in new product development. R&D Management, 36(3), 307–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell, R. (1994). Towards the fifth-generation innovation process. International Marketing Review, 11(1), 7–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schröder, A., & Hölzle, K. (2010). Virtual communities for innovation: Influence factors and impact on company innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(3), 257–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, D. (2010). Doing qualitative research: a practical handbook (3rd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hippel, E. (1986). Lead users: A source of novel product concepts. Management Science, 32(7), 791–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yakhlef, A. (2005). Immobility of tacit knowledge and the displacement of the locus of innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 8(2), 227–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • Chesbrough, H. W. (2011b). Open services innovation: rethinking your business to grow and compete in a new era. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lazzarotti, V., & Manzini, R. (2009b). Different modes of open innovation: A theoretical framework and an empirical study. International Journal of Innovation Management, 13(4), 615–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lettl, C. (2007b). User involvement competence for radical innovation. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 24(1–2), 53–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindič, J., Baloh, P., Ribière, V. M., & Desouza, K. C. (2011). Deploying information technologies for organizational innovation: Lessons from case studies. International Journal of Information Management, 31(2), 183–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piller, F. T., & Walcher, D. (2006b). Toolkits for idea competitions: a novel method to integrate users in new product development. R&D Management, 36(3), 307–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Hippel, E. (2001b). Perspective: User toolkits for innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18(4), 247–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Zug, ZG, Switzerland

    Matthias Hürlimann

  2. Stockholm University School of Business, Stockholm, Sweden

    Ali Yakhlef

Authors
  1. Matthias Hürlimann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ali Yakhlef
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Yakhlef .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Uppsala University, Uppsala, 751 20, Sweden

    Jenny S. Z. Eriksson Lundström

  2. Department of Informatics, Umeå University, Umeå, 901 87, Sweden

    Mikael Wiberg

  3. Uppsala University, Uppsala, 751 20, Sweden

    Stefan Hrastinski

  4. Uppsala University, Uppsala, 751 20, Sweden

    Mats Edenius

  5. Uppsala University, Uppsala, 751 20, Sweden

    Pär J. Ågerfalk

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hürlimann, M., Yakhlef, A. (2013). Open Strengths and Weaknesses of IT User Innovation: Evidence from Three Cases. In: Eriksson Lundström, J., Wiberg, M., Hrastinski, S., Edenius, M., Ågerfalk, P. (eds) Managing Open Innovation Technologies. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31650-0_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation