Skip to main content

Comparative Study on Sleet and Snow Disaster in Southern China and Hurricane Katrina Disater in USA

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Integrated Risk Governance

Part of the book series: IHDP-Integrated Risk Governance Project Series ((IHDP-IRGPS))

Abstract

Based on the recent research on definitions of catastrophes a disaster can be determined as a catastrophe if it conforms two or more than two standards among the following four standards: (1) Fatality exceeds 10,000; (2) Direct economic losses exceed 100 billion Yuan (about 10 billion Euros); (3) Affected area exceeds 100,000 km2; and (4) Return period of hazards exceeds 50 years. The sleet & snow disaster in southern China in 2008 affected 21 provinces (municipalities directly under the central government and autonomous regions), and it caused the urgent evacuation of 1,660,000 people. The direct economic losses were over 151.6 billion Yuan. The affected area was approximately 1,000,000 km2. The US Hurricane Katrina had a severe impact on four states, and it caused the emergent relocation of 770,000 people. The direct economic losses were over 100 billion dollars and the affected area was approximately 400,000 km2. Both of these events can be considered as catastrophes according to the definition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    1ft = 0.3048 m, similarly hereinafter.

  2. 2.

    The early warnings for snow disasters are classified into four grades, i.e. the blue early warning, the yellow early warning, the orange early warning and the red early warning from the low to the high grade.

References

  • DOC (U.S. Department of Commerce). 2005. Estimated damage and insurance settlements effects from Hurricanes Katrina, Rita, and Wilma.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Bureau of Statistics of China. 2009. China statistical yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi, P.J., Wang, M., Wang J.A., et al., 2009. On the classification standards of large scale disaster and large scale disaster insurance: the perspective from Wenchuan Earthquake and southern freezing rain and snowstorm disaster, China. The Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Asian Catastrophe Insurance, Beijing, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi, P.J., and Y.H. Liu. 2009. Chinese paradigm of catastrophe risk governance. Journal of US-China Public Administration 6(6): 18–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Federal Government. 2006. A failure of initiative: final report of the select bipartisan committee to investigate the preparation for and response to Hurricane Katrina. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ming Wang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Beijing Normal University Press, Beijing and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wang, M., Lu, L., Shi, P. (2013). Comparative Study on Sleet and Snow Disaster in Southern China and Hurricane Katrina Disater in USA. In: Shi, P., Jaeger, C., Ye, Q. (eds) Integrated Risk Governance. IHDP-Integrated Risk Governance Project Series. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31641-8_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics