X-ray Image Contrast Enhancement Using the Second Generation Curvelet Transform

  • Hao Li
  • Guanying Huo
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7389)


In this paper, a novel X-ray image contrast enhancement method using the second generation curvelet transform is proposed in order to better enhance contrast and edges while remove noise. First, source images are decomposed in the curvelet transform domain. A nonlinear enhancement operator is applied to low frequency subbands to enhance global contrast. Combining with threshold denoising, the nonlinear enhancement operator is also applied to high frequency subbands to enhance edges and reduce noise. Finally, the processed coefficients are reconstructed to obtain enhanced images. Experimental results on X-ray images show that compared with histogram equalization and wavelet based contrast enhancement, the proposed method can effectively enhance contrast and edges of X-ray images while better reducing noise, thus has better visual effect.


X-ray image contrast enhancement curvelet transform nonlinear enhancement operator denoising 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Kanwal, N., Girdhar, A., Gupta, S.: Region Based Adaptive Contrast Enhancement of Medical X-Ray Images. In: 2011 5th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering, pp. 1–5. IEEE Press, Wuhan (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen, S.D., Ramli, A.R.: Minimum Mean Brightness Error Bi-Histogram Eualization in Contrast Enhancement. IEEE Trans. on Consumer Electronics 49, 1310–1319 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Polesel, A., Ramponi, G., Mathews, V.J.: Image Enhancement via Adaptive Unsharp Masking. IEEE Trans. on Image Processing 9, 505–510 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zimmerman, J.B., Pizer, S.M., Staab, E.V., Perry, J.R., McCartney, W., Brenton, B.C.: An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Adaptive Histogram Equalization for Contrast Enhancement. IEEE Trans. on Medical Imaging 7, 304–312 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zong, X., Laine, A.F., Geiser, E.A.: Denoising and Contrast Enhancement via Wavelet Shrinkage and Nonlinear Adaptive Gain. In: Proc. of SPIE, vol. 2762, pp. 566–574 (1996)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Candès, E.J., Donoho, D.L.: Curvelets -a Surprisingly Effective Nonadaptive Representation for Objects with Edges. Vanderbilt University Press, Nashville (2000)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Candès, E.J., Demanet, L., Donoho, D.L., Ying, L.: Fast Discret Curvelet Transforms. Applied and Computational Mathematics, 1–43 (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Donoho, D.L.: Denoising by Soft Thresholding. IEEE Trans. on Information Theory 41, 613–627 (1995)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Azriel, R., Avinash, C.K.: Digital Picture Processing. Academic Press, New York (1982)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hao Li
    • 1
  • Guanying Huo
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Computer and Information TechnologyBeijing Jiaotong UniversityBeijingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations