Advertisement

An Ensemble Method Based on Confidence Probability for Multi-domain Sentiment Classification

  • Quan Zhou
  • Yuhong Zhang
  • Xuegang Hu
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7389)

Abstract

Multi-domain sentiment classification methods based on ensemble decision attracts more and more attention. These methods avoid collecting a large amount of new training data in target domain and expand aspect of deploying source domain systems. However, these methods face some important issues: the quantity of incorrect pre-labeled data remains high and the fixed weights limit accuracy of the ensemble classifier. Thus, we propose a novel method, named CEC, which integrates the ideas of self-training and co-training into multi-domain sentiment classification. Classification confidence is used to pre-label the data in the target domain. Meanwhile, CEC combines the base classifiers according to classification confidence probabilities when taking a vote for prediction. The experiments show the accuracy of the proposed algorithm has highly improved compared with the baseline algorithms.

Keywords

ensemble multi-domain sentiment classification co-training 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Whitehead, M., Yaeger, L.: Building a General Purpose Cross-Domain Sentiment Mining Model. In: Proceedings of the 2009 WRI World Congress on Computer Science and Information Engineering, pp. 472–476 (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Li, S., Zong, C.: Multi-domain Sentiment Classification. In: Proceedings of ACL 2008: HTL. Short Papers (Companion Volume), pp. 257–260 (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Avrim, B., Tom, M.: Combining Labeled and Unlabeled Data with Co-Training. In: Proceeding of The Eleventh Annual Conference on Computational Learning Theory, pp. 92–100 (1998)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ng, V., Cardie, C.: Weakly Supervised Natural Language Learning without Redundant Views. In: Proceedings of the 2003 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Human Language Technology, Edmonton, Canada, pp. 94–101 (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Clark, S., Curran, J., Osborne, M.: Bootstrapping Pos Taggers Using Unlabelled Data. In: Proceedings of the Seventh Conference on Natural Language Learning at HLT-NAACL 2003, Edmonton, Canada, pp. 49–55 (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dietterich, T.G.: Ensemble Methods in Machine Learning. In: Kittler, J., Roli, F. (eds.) MCS 2000. LNCS, vol. 1857, pp. 1–15. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Freund, Y., Schapire, R.E.: A Decision Theoretic Generalization of On-line Learning and an Application to Boosting. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 55(1), 119–139 (1997)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yang, Y., Pedersen, J.: A Comparative Study on Feature Selection in Text Categorization. In: ICML, pp. 412–420 (1997)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tan, S., Wang, Y., Cheng, X.: An Efficient Feature Ranking Measure for Text Categorization. In: SAC 2008, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil, pp. 407–413 (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Quan Zhou
    • 1
  • Yuhong Zhang
    • 1
  • Xuegang Hu
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Computer & InformationHefei University of TechnologyHefeiChina

Personalised recommendations