Skip to main content

A Computationally Grounded Dynamic Logic of Agency, with an Application to Legal Actions

  • Conference paper
Deontic Logic in Computer Science (DEON 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7393))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 570 Accesses

Abstract

In this article, we propose a Dynamic Logic of Propositional Control DL-PC in which the concept of ‘seeing to it that’ (abbreviated stit) as studied by Belnap, Horty and others can be expressed; more precisely, we capture the concept of the so-called Chellas stit theory and the deliberatibe stit theory, as opposed to Belnap’s original achievement stit. In this logic, the sentence ‘group G sees to it that φ’ is defined in terms of dynamic operators: it is paraphrased as ‘group G is going to execute an action now such that whatever actions the agents outside G can execute at the same time, φ is true afterwards’. We also prove that the satisfiability problem is decidable. In the second part of the article we extend DL-PC with operators modeling normative concepts, resulting in a logic DL-PCLeg. In particular, we define the concepts of ‘legally seeing to it that’ and ‘illegally seeing to it that’. We prove that the decidability result for DL-PC transfers to DL-PCLeg.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ågotnes, T.: Action and knowledge in alternating-time temporal logic. Synthese 149(2), 377–409 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ågotnes, T., van der Hoek, W., Wooldridge, M.: Robust normative systems and a logic of norm compliance. Logic Journal of IGPL 18(1), 4–30 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Alur, R., de Alfaro, L., Henzinger, T.A., Krishnan, S.C., Mang, F.Y.C., Qadeer, S., Rajamani, S.K., Taşiran, S.: Mocha user manual. University of Berkeley Report (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Alur, R., Henzinger, T.A.: Reactive modules. Formal Methods in System Design 15(1), 7–48 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Alur, R., Henzinger, T.A., Kupferman, O.: Alternating-time temporal logic. J. of the ACM 49(5), 672–713 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Balbiani, P., Gasquet, O., Herzig, A., Schwarzentruber, F., Troquard, N.: Coalition games over Kripke semantics. In: Dégremont, C., Keiff, L., Rückert, H. (eds.) Dialogues, Logics and Other Strange Things – Essays in Honour of Shahid Rahman, pp. 11–32. College Publications (2008), http://www.collegepublications.co.uk/tributes/?00007

  7. Balbiani, P., Herzig, A., Troquard, N.: Alternative axiomatics and complexity of deliberative stit theories. J. of Philosophical Logic 37(4), 387–406 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Belnap, N., Perloff, M., Xu, M.: Facing the Future: Agents and Choices in Our Indeterminist World. Oxford University Press (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Blackburn, P., de Rijke, M., Venema, Y.: Modal Logic. Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science. University Press (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Broersen, J.: Modeling attempt and action failure in probabilistic stit logic. In: Walsh, T. (ed.) IJCAI, pp. 792–797. IJCAI/AAAI (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cohen, P.R., Levesque, H.J.: Intention is choice with commitment. Artificial Intelligence 42(2–3), 213–261 (1990)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Herzig, A., Lorini, E.: A dynamic logic of agency I: STIT, abilities and powers. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 19, 89–121 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Herzig, A., Lorini, E., Moisan, F., Troquard, N.: A dynamic logic of normative systems. In: Walsh, T. (ed.) International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI, Barcelona. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Herzig, A., Schwarzentruber, F.: Properties of logics of individual and group agency. In: Areces, C., Goldblatt, R. (eds.) Advances in Modal Logic, AiML, Nancy, pp. 133–149. College Publications (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Herzig, A., Schwarzentruber, F.: Properties of logics of individual and group agency. In: Areces, C., Goldblatt, R. (eds.) AiML 2008, Nancy, pp. 133–149. College Publications (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. van der Hoek, W., Walther, D., Wooldridge, M.: On the logic of cooperation and the transfer of control. JAIR 37, 437–477 (2010)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. van der Hoek, W., Wooldridge, M.: On the dynamics of delegation, cooperation and control: a logical account. In: Proc. AAMAS 2005 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. van der Hoek, W., Wooldridge, M.: On the logic of cooperation and propositional control. Artificial Intelligence 164(1-2), 81–119 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Horty, J.: Agency and deontic logic. Oxford University Press (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jamroga, W., van der Hoek, W.: Agents that know how to play. Fundamenta Informaticae 63(2-3), 185–219 (2004)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Lomuscio, A., Raimondi, F.: mcmas: A Model Checker for Multi-agent Systems. In: Hermanns, H. (ed.) TACAS 2006. LNCS, vol. 3920, pp. 450–454. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Miller, J.S., Moss, L.S.: The undecidability of iterated modal relativization. Studia Logica 79(3), 373–407 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Sergot, M.J., Craven, R.: The Deontic Component of Action Language \(n{\mathcal{C}}+\). In: Goble, L., Meyer, J.-J.C. (eds.) DEON 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4048, pp. 222–237. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Shoham, Y., Tennenholtz, M.: On social laws for artificial agent societies: Off-line design. In: Agre, P.E., Rosenschein, S.J. (eds.) Computational Theories of Interaction and Agency, pp. 597–618. MIT Press, Cambridge (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tiomkin, M.L., Makowsky, J.A.: Propositional dynamic logic with local assignments. Theor. Comput. Sci. 36, 71–87 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. van Benthem, J., van Eijck, J., Kooi, B.: Logics of communication and change. Information and Computation 204(11), 1620–1662 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. van der Hoek, W., Lomuscio, A., Wooldridge, M.: On the complexity of practical ATL model checking. In: Proc. AAMAS 2006 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  28. van der Hoek, W., Wooldridge, M.: Cooperation, knowledge, and time: Alternating-time temporal epistemic logic and its applications. Studia Logica 75, 125–157 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. van Ditmarsch, H., Herzig, A., de Lima, T.: From situation calculus to dynamic logic. J. of Logic and Computation 21(2), 179–204 (2011)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. van Ditmarsch, H.P., van der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.P.: Dynamic epistemic logic with assignment. In: Dignum, F., Dignum, V., Koenig, S., Kraus, S., Singh, M.P., Wooldridge, M. (eds.) Proc. of AAMAS 2005, pp. 141–148. ACM (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  31. van Ditmarsch, H.P., van der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic. Kluwer Academic Publishers (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  32. van Eijck, J.: Making things happen. Studia Logica 66(1), 41–58 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Wilm, A.: Determinism and non-determinism in PDL. Theor. Comput. Sci. 87(1), 189–202 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Wooldridge, M.: Computationally grounded theories of agency. In: 4th International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems, ICMAS 2000, pp. 13–22. IEEE Computer Society (2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Herzig, A., de Lima, T., Lorini, E., Troquard, N. (2012). A Computationally Grounded Dynamic Logic of Agency, with an Application to Legal Actions. In: Ågotnes, T., Broersen, J., Elgesem, D. (eds) Deontic Logic in Computer Science. DEON 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7393. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31570-1_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31570-1_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31569-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31570-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics