Skip to main content

Representing Non Classical Concepts in Formal Ontologies: Prototypes and Exemplars

  • Chapter
Book cover New Challenges in Distributed Information Filtering and Retrieval

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 439))

Abstract

Concept representation is still an open problem in the field of ontology engineering and, more in general, of knowledge representation. In particular, it still remains unsolved the problem of representing "non classical" concepts, i.e. concepts that cannot be defined in terms of necessary and sufficient conditions. In this chapter we review empirical evidence from cognitive psychology, which suggests that concept representation is not an unitary phenomenon. In particular, it seems that human beings employ both prototype and exemplar based representations in order to represent non classical concepts. We suggest that a similar, hybrid prototype-exemplar based approach could be useful also in the field of formal ontology technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P.: The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementations and Applications, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Baader, F., Hollunder, B.: Embedding defaults into terminological knowledge representation formalisms. J. Autom. Reasoning 14(1), 149–180 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bizer, C., Heath, T., Berners-Lee, T.: Linked Data - The Story So Far. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information System 5(3), 1–22 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bobillo, F., Straccia, U.: An OWL Ontology for Fuzzy OWL 2. In: Rauch, J., Raś, Z.W., Berka, P., Elomaa, T. (eds.) ISMIS 2009. LNCS, vol. 5722, pp. 151–160. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bonatti, P.A., Lutz, C., Wolter, F.: Description logics with circumscription. In: Proc. KR 2006, pp. 400–410 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Brachman, R., Levesque, H. (eds.): Readings in Knowledge Representation. Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos (1985)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Brachman, R., Schmolze, J.G.: An overview of the KL-ONE knowledge representation system. Cognitive Science 9, 171–216 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donini, F.M., Nardi, D., Rosati, R.: Description logics of minimal knowl-edge and negation as failure. ACM Trans. Comput. Log. 3(2), 177–225 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Frixione, M., Lieto, A.: The Computational Representation of Concepts in Formal Ontologies: Some General Consideration. In: Proc. KEOD 2010, Valencia, Spain, pp. 396–403 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Frixione, M., Lieto, A.: Representing Concepts in Formal Ontologies: Compositionality vs. Typicality Effects, to appear in Logic and Logical Philosophy (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagliardi, F.: A Prototype-Exemplars Hybrid Cognitive Model of “Phenomenon of Typicality” in Categorization: A Case Study in Biologi-cal Classification. In: Proc. 30th Annual Conf. of the Cognitive Science Society, Austin, TX, pp. 1176–1181 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagliardi, F.: Cognitive Models of Typicality in Categorization with In-stance-Based Machine Learning. In: Practices of Cognition. Recent Researches in Cognitive Science, pp. 115–130. University of Trento Press (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gärdenfors, P.: Conceptual Spaces: The Geometry of Thought. The MIT Press/Bradford Books, Cambridge, MA (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, B.J., Booth, D.L., Spink, A.: Determining the informational, navigational, and transactional intent of Web queries. Information Processing and Management 44, 1251–1266 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machery, E.: Doing without Concepts. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Malt, B.C.: An on-line investigation of prototype and exemplar strategies in classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 15(4), 539–555 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medin, D.L., Schaffer, M.M.: Context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review 85(3), 207–238 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medin, D.L., Schwanenflugel, P.J.: Linear separability in classification learning. J. of Exp. Psyc.: Human Learning and Memory 7, 355–368 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minsky, M.: A framework for representing knowledge. In: Winston, P. (ed.) The Psychology of Computer Vision. McGraw-Hill, New York (1975); Also in Brachman & Levesque (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, G.L.: The Big Book of Concepts. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nosofsky, R.M.: Attention, similarity, and the identification categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 115, 39–57 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osherson, D.N., Smith, E.E.: On the adequacy of prototype theory as a theory of concepts. Cognition 11, 237–262 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  • Quillian, M.R.: Semantic memory. In: Minsky, M. (ed.) Semantic Information Processing. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, E.: Cognitive representation of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology 104, 573–605 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J.D., Murray, M.J., Minda, J.P.: Straight talk about linear separabili-ty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 23, 659–668 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J.D., Minda, J.P.: Prototypes in the mist: The early epochs of cate-gory learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 24, 1411–1436 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J.D., Minda, J.P.: Thirty categorization results in search of a model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 26, 3–27 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoilos, G., Stamou, G., Tzouvaras, V., Pan, J.Z., Horrocks, I.: Fuzzy OWL: Uncertainty and the Semantic Web. In: Proc. Workshop on OWL: Experience and Directions (OWLED 2005). CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 188 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L.: Philosophische Untersuchungen. Blackwell, Oxford (1953)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcello Frixione .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Frixione, M., Lieto, A. (2013). Representing Non Classical Concepts in Formal Ontologies: Prototypes and Exemplars. In: Lai, C., Semeraro, G., Vargiu, E. (eds) New Challenges in Distributed Information Filtering and Retrieval. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 439. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31546-6_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31546-6_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31545-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31546-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics