Skip to main content

Evolving a Pareto Front for an Optimal Bi-objective Robust Interception Problem with Imperfect Information

  • Conference paper
Book cover EVOLVE - A Bridge between Probability, Set Oriented Numerics, and Evolutionary Computation II

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 175))

Abstract

In this paper, a multi-objective optimal interception problem with imperfect information is solved by using a Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm (MOEA). The traditional setting of the interception problem is aimed either at minimizing a miss distance for a given interception duration or at minimizing an interception time for a given miss distance. In contrast with such a setting, here the problem is posed as a simultaneous search for both objectives. Moreover, it is assumed that the interceptor has imperfect information on the target. This problem can be considered as a game between the interceptor, who is aiming at a minimum final distance between himself and the target at a minimal final time, and an artificial opponent aiming at maximizing these values. The artificial opponent represents the effect of the interceptor’s imperfect information (measurement inaccuracies) on the success of the interception. Both players utilize neural net controllers that evolve during the evolutionary optimization. This study is the first attempt to utilize evolutionary multi-objective optimization for solving multi-objective differential games, and as far as our review went, the first attempt to solve multi-objective differential games in general.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Glizer, V.Y., Shinar, J.: On the Structure of a Class of Time Optimal Trajectories. Optimal Control Applications & Methods 14, 271–279 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Laumanns, M., Thiele, L., Zitzler, E., Welzl, E., Deb, K.: Running Time Analysis of Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithms on a Simple Discrete Optimization Problem. In: Guervós, J.J.M., Adamidis, P.A., Beyer, H.-G., Fernández-Villacañas, J.-L., Schwefel, H.-P. (eds.) PPSN 2002. LNCS, vol. 2439, pp. 44–53. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Zelikovsky, A., Dmitrii, L., Solomon, D.: Multiobjective games and determining Pareto-Nash equilibria. Buletinul Academiei De Stiinte, A Republicii Moldova Matematica (3), 115–122 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Somasundaram, K., Baras, J.S.: Pareto Nash Replies for Multi-Objective Games. The Institute for Systems Research ISR technical report 2009-4 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zeleny, M.: Games with multiple payoffs. International Journal of Game Theory 4(4), 179–191 (1975)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Contini, B.M.: A decision model under uncertainty with multiple payoffs. In: Mensch, A. (ed.) Theory of Games; Techniques and Applications, pp. 50–63. American Elsevier Pub. Co. (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Susan, X.L.: Interactive strategy sets in multiple payoff games. Computers & Industrial Engineering 37(3), 613–630 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sakawa, M.: Genetic Algorithms and Fuzzy Multiobjective Optimization. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Avigad, G., Eisenstadt, E., Weiss, M.: Optimal Strategies for Multi Objective Games and Their Search by Evolutionary Multi Objective Optimization. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Computational Intelligence in Games (CIG 2011), Seoul, South Korea, August 31-September 4 (2011) ISBN: 978-14577-0009-5

    Google Scholar 

  10. Avigad, G., Branke, J.: Embedded Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimization for Worst Case Robustness. In: 2008 Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO 2008), pp. 617–624. ACM Press, USA (2008) ISBN 978-1-60558-131-6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., Meyarivan, T.: A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 6(2), 182–197 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gideon Avigad .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Avigad, G., Eisenstadt, E., Glizer, V.Y. (2013). Evolving a Pareto Front for an Optimal Bi-objective Robust Interception Problem with Imperfect Information. In: Schütze, O., et al. EVOLVE - A Bridge between Probability, Set Oriented Numerics, and Evolutionary Computation II. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 175. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31519-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31519-0_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31518-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31519-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics