Skip to main content

When Wide Scope Is Not Enough: Scope and Topicality of Discourse Referents

  • Conference paper
Logic, Language and Meaning

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 7218))

Abstract

This paper analyses the semantic attributes discourse referents in Catalan Sign Language may have in order to have a corresponding location established in sign space. It is argued that a combination of scope and topicality is required when analysing the correlation between the introduction of entities into the discourse and assigning a spatial location.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bahan, B., Kegl, J., MacLaughlin, D., Neidle, C.: Convergent evidence for the structure of determiner phrases in American Sign Language. In: Gabriele, L., Hardison, D., Westmoreland, R. (eds.) Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Meeting of the Formal Linguistics Society of Mid-America, FLSMVI. Syntax & Semantics/Pragmatics, vol. II. Indiana University Linguistics Club (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brentari, D.: A prosodic model of sign language phonology. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chiarcos, C., Claus, B., Grabski, M.: Salience in linguistisc and beyond. In: Chiarcos, C., Claus, B., Grabski, M. (eds.) Salience. Multidisciplinary perspectives on its function in discourse. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Enç, M.: The semantics of specificity. Linguistic Inquiry 22(1), 1–25 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Engberg-Pedersen, E.: Space in Danish Sign Language: The semantics and morphosyntax of the use of space in a visual language. Signum Press, Hamburg (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Farkas, D.F.: Dependent indefinites. In: Corblin, F., Godard, D., Marandin, J.M. (eds.) Empirical Issues in Formal Syntax and Semantics, pp. 243–267. Peter Lang Publishers (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Grosz, B., Joshi, A., Weinstein, S.: Centering: A framework for modelling the local coherence of discourse. Computational Linguistics 2(21), 203–225 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  8. von Heusinger, K.: Specificity and definiteness in sentence and discourse structure. Journal of Semantics 19, 245–274 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ionin, T.: This is definitely specific: Specificity and definiteness in article systems. Natural Language Semantics 14, 175–234 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kamp, H., Reyle, U.: From discourse to logic. Introduction to modeltheoretic semantics of natural language, formal logic and discourse representation theory. Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Karttunen, L.: Discourse referents. In: McCawley, J. (ed.) Syntax and Semantics: Notes from the Linguistic Underground, pp. 363–386. Academic Press, New York (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Klima, E., Bellugi, U.: The signs of language. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lillo-Martin, D., Klima, E.: Pointing out differences: ASL pronouns in syntactic theory. In: Fischer, S., Siple, P. (eds.) Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research. Linguistics, vol. 1, pp. 191–210. University Chicago Press, Chicago (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Quer, J.: Quantifying across language modalities: generalized tripartite structures in signed languages. Presentation at the I Workshop on Sign Languages, EHU Vitoria-Gasteiz (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Quer, J.: Signed agreement: Putting some more arguments together. Presentation at TISLR10. Purdue University, Indiana (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Reinhart, T.: Pragmatics and linguistics. an analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica 27, 53–94 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Roberts, C.: Modal subordination and pronominal anaphora in discourse. Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 683–721 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Schlenker, P.: Donkey anaphora: the view from sign language (ASL and LSF). Linguistics & Philosophy (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Vallduví, E.: The Informational component. Garland Press, New York (1992)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Barberà, G. (2012). When Wide Scope Is Not Enough: Scope and Topicality of Discourse Referents. In: Aloni, M., Kimmelman, V., Roelofsen, F., Sassoon, G.W., Schulz, K., Westera, M. (eds) Logic, Language and Meaning. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7218. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31482-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31482-7_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31481-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31482-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics