Skip to main content

As Simple as It Seems

  • Conference paper
Logic, Language and Meaning

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 7218))

  • 1686 Accesses

Abstract

Even when linearized after it, seem can take scope over the modal can, provided that a downward-entailing trigger is present locally. Downward-entailingness plays a key role in the scope reversal: seem takes scope not only over can, but also over the trigger, because it is a mobile positive polarity item, which has the ability to raise covertly above a potential anti-licenser. This movement permits aspectual configurations that are otherwise disallowed in the complement of seem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Chomsky, N.: Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In: Martin, R., Michaels, D., Uriagereka, J. (eds.) Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, pp. 89–155. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • von Fintel, K., Iatridou, S.: Epistemic containment. Linguistic Inquiry 34, 173–198 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gajewski, J.: Neg-raising: Polarity and presupposition. Ph.D. thesis. MIT, Cambridge (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Homer, V.: Epistemic modals: High ma non troppo. In: Proceedings of NELS 40 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Homer, V.: Domains of polarity items. Journal of Semantics, under revision (2012a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Homer, V.: Neg-raising and positive polarity: The view from modals. Ms., ENS (2012b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, L.: Remarks on neg-raising. Syntax and Semantics 9, 129–220 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Iatridou, S., Zeijlstra, H.: Modals, negation and polarity. Talk given at Glow Asia 8 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Israel, M.: Polarity sensitivity as lexical semantics. Linguistics and Philosophy 19, 619–666 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, P.: I can’t seem to figure this out. In: Birner, B.J., Ward, G. (eds.) Drawing the Boundaries of Meaning: Neo-Gricean Studies in Pragmatics and Semantics in Honor of Laurence R. Horn. Studies in Language Companion Series, vol. 80. John Benjamins Publishing Company (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Langendoen, D.T.: The ‘can’t seem to’ construction. Linguistic Inquiry 1(1), 25–35 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sportiche, D.: Division of labor between Merge and Move. In: Proceedings of the Workshop Division of Linguistic Labor, the La Bretesche Workshop, pp. 206–285 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • von Stechow, A.: The (non)-interpretation of subordinate tense. Talk given at Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stowell, T.: The tense of infinitives. Linguistic Inquiry 13, 561–570 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wurmbrand, S.: Tense and aspect in English infinitives. Ms., University of Connecticut. Storrs (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Homer, V. (2012). As Simple as It Seems. In: Aloni, M., Kimmelman, V., Roelofsen, F., Sassoon, G.W., Schulz, K., Westera, M. (eds) Logic, Language and Meaning. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7218. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31482-7_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31482-7_36

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31481-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31482-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics