Advertisement

Preference for Combining or Separating Events in Human and Avatar Decisions

  • Peter H. M. P. Roelofsma
  • Leo Versteeg
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 277)

Abstract

According to the Renewable Resources Model people have limited emotional resource capacity for making decisions. As a result people have a general preference for spreading outcome events over time (Linville and Fisher (1991). This study examines whether the introduction of avatars will alleviate limited emotional resources and result in increased preference for combining events. This hypothesis was tested using a 2x2 factorial between subjects design which systematically manipulated the decision outcome (gains versus losses) and avatar use (avatar mediated versus non avatar mediated decisions). Preferences for combining or separating positive and negative emotional impactful events were measured using choice problems of Linville and Fischer (1991). Results show a replication of Linville and Fisher (1991) but only in the non avatar condition. In contrast, in the avatar condition a significant increase of preference for combining events was observed as predicted. The results give support for the Renewable Resource Model.

Keywords

Avatar Mediated Communication Limited resource model Elderly Persons Human decision Making Time preference Spreading of outcomes 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ashford, S.J., Tsui, A.S.: Self-Regulation for Managerial Effectiveness: The Role of Active Feedback Seeking. The Academy of Management Journal 34(2), 251–280 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baumeister, R.F.: Yielding to Temptation: Self-control failure, impulsive purchasing and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research 28, 670–676 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baumeister, R.F., Smeichel, B.J., Vohs, K.D.: Self-regulation and the executive function: The self as controlling agent. In: Kruglanski, A.W., Higgins, E.T. (eds.) Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles, 2nd edn. Guilford, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Janis, L., Mann, L.: Decision making. Free Press, New York (1977)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Linville, P.W., Fischer, G.W.: Preference for separating or combining events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 60(1), 5–23 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Miller, D.T.: Ego involvement and attributions for success and failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 34, 901–906 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter H. M. P. Roelofsma
    • 1
  • Leo Versteeg
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Social SciencesVUA UniversityAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations