Skip to main content

Trust Games as a Model for Requests

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 7415))

Abstract

We apply of Game Theory to linguistic politeness, considering requests as the canonical speech act where polite expressions factor in. As making a request is necessarily both strategic and asymmetric, we adapt Trust Games, modifying them by the notions of reputation, face, and repetition. Given this framework, our results show that although some polite requests may not be rational under one-shot situations, they may become so under assumptions of reputation or observation. We also derive constraints for the levels of politeness that are necessary and sufficient for cooperative behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Lev-On, A., Chavez, A., Bicchieri, C.: Group and dyadic communication in trust games. Rationality and Society 22 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brown, P., Levinson, S.: Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fehr, E., Fischbacher, U.: The Nature of Human Altruism. Nature 425 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Franke, M.: Signal to Act. PhD Dissertation, University of Amsterdam (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Homans, G.: Social Behavior as Exchange. The American Journal of Sociology 63(6) (1958)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jag̈er, G.: Game-Theoretical Pragmatics. In: Handbook of Logic and Language, 2nd edn. Elsevier (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. McCabe, K., Rigdon, M., Smith, V.: Positive reciprocity and intentions in trust games. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 52 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Morgan, J., Steiglitz, K., Reis, G.: The Spite Motive and Equilibrium Behavior in Auctions. Contributions to Economic Analysis and Policy 2(1) (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nowak, M.A.: Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science 314(5805), 1560–1563 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pinker, S., Nowak, M.A., Lee, J.J.: The logic of indirect speech. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 105(3), 833–838 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Van Rooy, R.: Being polite is a handicap: Towards a game theoretical analysis of polite linguistic behavior. TARK 9 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Van Rooy, R.: Signalling games select Horn strategies. Linguistics and Philosophy (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Quinley, J. (2012). Trust Games as a Model for Requests. In: Lassiter, D., Slavkovik, M. (eds) New Directions in Logic, Language and Computation. ESSLLI ESSLLI 2010 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7415. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31467-4_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31467-4_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31466-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31467-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics