Skip to main content

Group as a Unit of Analysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Complex Human Dynamics

Part of the book series: Understanding Complex Systems ((UCS))

Abstract

A group can be viewed as an assembly of individual members but also as a collective entity with its own characteristics and dynamics. We argue that in order to understand connections between the individuals and the group-as-a-whole, one has to assume that groups are systems which can be analyzed at multiple, not just two levels. Below the level of the ‘group-as-a-whole’, there are many intermediate levels built one on top of one another. At each level of abstraction, a new organization emerges which has some causal power over the elements at lower levels. Higher level phenomena can be described as patterns built from elements at lower levels. In this chapter we review the existing theories that take a multilevel perspective on groups and conclude that this approach enables a well-founded empirical study of emergence of group as a collective entity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allport, F.H.: Institutional Behavior: Essays Toward a Re-Interpreting of Contemporary Social Organization. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill (1933)

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, H., McGrath, J.E., Berdahl, J.L.: Small Groups as Complex Systems. Formation, Coordination, Development, and Adaptation. Sage Publications, London (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakeman, R., Gottman, J.: Observing Interaction: An Introduction to Sequential Analysis, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, New York (1997)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bales, R.F.: Interaction Process Analysis: A Method for the Study of Small Groups. Addison-Wesley, Cambridge, MA (1950)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bales, R.F.: The equilibrium problem in small groups. In: Parsons, T., Bales, R.F., Shils, E.A. (eds.) Working Papers in the Theory of Action, pp. 111–161. Free Press, Glencoe (1953)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bales, R.F.: Task roles and social roles in problem solving groups. In: Maccoby, E.E., Newcomb, T.M., Hartley, E.L. (eds.) Readings in Social Psychology, 3rd edn. Methuen, London (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bales, R.F.: SYMLOG: a practical approach to the study of groups. In: Blumberg, H.H., Hare, A.P., Kent, V., Davies, M. (eds.) Small Groups and Social Interaction, vol. 2, pp. 499–523. Wiley, New York (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bales, R.F.: Social Interaction Systems: Theory and Measurement. Transaction, New Brunswick (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bales, R.F., Cohen, S.P.: SYMLOG: A System for the Multiple Level Observation of Groups. Free Press, New York (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bales, R.F., Strodtbeck, F.L.: Phases in group problem-solving. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 46, 485–495 (1951)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bar Tal, D.: Bridging between micro and macro perspectives in social psychology. In: Van Lange, P.M. (ed.) Bridging Social Psychology: Benefits of Transdisciplinary Approaches, chapter 50, pp. 341–346. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedau, M., Humphreys, P. (eds.): Emergence: Contemporary Readings in Philosophy and Science. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, H.: Society as symbolic interaction. In: Rose, A.M. (ed.) Human Behavior and Social Process: An Interactionist Approach. Houghton-Mifflin, Boston (1962). Reprinted in Blumer (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, H.: Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. University of California Press, Berkeley (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R.J.: Group Processes: Dynamics Within and Between Groups, 2nd edn. Blackwell, Oxford (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, P.J.: Interaction in small groups. In: DeLamater, J. (ed.) Handbook of Social Psychology, pp. 363–388. Kluwer-Plenum, New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, D. (ed.): Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers by Kurt Lewin. Harper & Row, New York (1951)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, D.: Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: a typology of composition models. J. Appl. Psychol. 83, 234–246 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J.S.: Foundations of Social Theory. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  • Erez, M., Gati, E.: A dynamic, multi-level model of culture: from the micro level of the individual to the macro level of a global culture. Appl. Psychol. Int. Rev. 53(4), 583–598 (2004). doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson, B.L., Losada, M.F.: Positive affect and the complex dynamics of human flourishing. Am. Psychol. 60(7), 678–686 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedkin, N.E.: Social cohesion. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 30(1), 409–425 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, N.: Agent-based social simulation: dealing with complexity. Downloaded 15.12.2010, from http://www.agsm.edu.au/bobm/teaching/SimSS/ABSS-dealingwithcomplexity-1-1.pdf (2004)

  • Goldstein, J.: Emergence as a construct: history and issues. Emergence 1, 49–72 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J.M.: Time Series Analysis: A Comprehensive Introduction for Social Scientists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J.M.: What Predicts Divorce? Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J.M., Roy, A.K.: Sequential Analysis: A Guide for Behavioral Researchers. Cambridge University Press, New York (1990)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J.M., Swanson, C., Swanson, K.R.: A General systems theory of marriage: nonlinear difference equation modeling of marital interactions. Pers.Soc. Psychol. Rev. 6(4), 326–340 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goździkiewicz, A., Bańka, A.: SYMLOG jako metoda pomiaru i predykcji sukcesu w zarządzaniu. In: Witkowski, S. (ed.) Psychologiczne wyznaczniki sukcesu w zarządzaniu, Prace Psychologiczne 6, 215–225 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J.: Can complexity help us better understand risk? Risk Manage. 8(4), 227–267 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J.: The future of the social sciences and humanities in the science of complex systems. Innov. Eur. J. Soc. Sci. 23(2), 115–134 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koffka, K.: Principles of Gestalt Psychology. Harcourt, Brace & World, New York (1935)

    Google Scholar 

  • Köhler, W.: Gestalt Psychology. Horace Liveright, New York (1929)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulesza, W., Nowak, A.: Dlaczego Ciebie lubię? Bo się koordynujemy. In: Winkowska-Nowak, K., Rychwalska, A. (eds.) Modelowanie matematyczne i symulacje komputerowe w naukach społecznych. Wydawnictwo SWPS Academica, Warszawa (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lévi-Strauss, C.: Structural Anthropology. Basic Books, New York (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewes, G.H.: Problems of Life and Mind, Series 1, vol. 2. Trubner, London (1875)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, G. (ed.): Resolving Social Conflicts & Field Theory in Social Science. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K.: Defining the ‘Field at a given time’. Psychol. Rev. 50(3), 292–310 (1943). Reprinted in Lewin, G. (ed.): Resolving Social Conflicts and Field Theory in Social Science, pp. 200–211. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K.: Constructs in psychology and psychological ecology. University of Iowa Studies in Child Welfare, 20, 1–29 (1944). Reprinted under the title “Constructs in field theory,” in Lewin, G. (ed.): Resolving Social Conflicts and Field Theory in Social Science, pp. 191–199. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K.: Frontiers in group dynamics 1. Hum. Relat. 1, 5–41 (1947). Reprinted in Lewin G. (ed.): Resolving Social Conflicts and Field Theory in Social Science, pp. 301–366. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Losada, M.: The complex dynamics of high performance teams. Math. Comput. Model. 30(9–10), 179–192 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Losada, M., Heaphy, E.: The role of positivity and connectivity in the performance of business teams. Am. Behav. Sci. 47(6), 740–765 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Losada, M., Markovitch, S.: Group analyzer: a system for dynamic analysis of group interaction. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 101–110. IEEE Computer Society Press, Washington, DC (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, K.L., Richardson, M.J., Schmidt, R.C.: Social connection through joint action and interpersonal coordination. Top. Cogn. Sci. 1(2), 320–339 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, J.E., Arrow, H., Berdahl, J.L.: The study of groups: past, present, and future. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 4, 95–105 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G.H.: Mind, Self, and Society. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1934)

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J.G., Miller, J.L.: Cybernetics, general systems theory, and living systems theory. In: Levine, R.L., Fitzgerald, H.E. (eds.) Analysis of Dynamic Psychological Systems, vol. 1, pp. 9–34. Plenum, New York (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgeson, F.P., Hofmann, D.A.: The structure and function of collective constructs: implications for multilevel research and theory development. Acad. Manage. Rev. 24, 249–265 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Moritz, S.E., Watson, C.B.: Levels of analysis issues in group psychology: using efficacy as an example of a multilevel model. Group Dyn. Theory Res. Pract. 2(4), 285–298 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, A.: Dynamical minimalism: why less is more in psychology. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 8(2), 183–192 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, A., Vallacher, R.R.: Dynamical Social Psychology. Guilford Press, New York (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, A., Vallacher, R.R.: Synchronization dynamics in close relationships: coupled logistic maps as a model for interpersonal phenomena. In: Klonowski, W. (ed.) From Quanta to Societies. Frontiers on Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 2, pp. 165–180. Pabst Science Publishers, Berlin (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T.: The Structure of Social Action. Free Press, New York (1937)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D.M., House, R.J.: Meso organizational behavior: avoiding three fundamental biases. In: Cooper, C.L., Rousseau, D.M. (eds.) Trends in Organizational Behavior, vol. 1, pp. 13–30. Wiley, London (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Salazar, A.J.: An analysis of the development and evolution of roles in the small group. Small Group Res. 27, 475 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, R.K.: Emergence in sociology: contemporary philosophy of mind and some implications for sociological theory. Am. J. Sociol. 107(3), 551 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, R.K.: Social Emergence: Societies as Complex Systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sidanius, J., Pratto, F.: Social Dominance: An Intergroup Theory of Social Hierarchy and Oppression. Cambridge University Press, New York (1999)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A.: Alternative views of complexity. In: Bedau, M.A., Humphreys, P. (eds.) Emergence: Contemporary Readings in Philosophy and Science, pp. 249–258. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, R.: Role: sociological aspects. In: Sills, D. (ed.) International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. Macmillan, New York (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R.A.: Collective memory, group minds, and the extended mind thesis. Cogn. Process. 6(4), 227–236 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiltermuth, S., Heath, C.: Synchrony and cooperation. Psychol. Sci. 20(1), 1–5 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wimsatt, W.C.: Aggregativity: reductive heuristics for finding emergence. In: Bedau, M.A., Humphreys, P. (eds.) Emergence: Contemporary Readings in Philosophy and Science, pp. 99–110. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wundt, W.: An Introduction to Psychology. Macmillan, New York (1912)

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karolina Lisiecka .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lisiecka, K. (2013). Group as a Unit of Analysis. In: Nowak, A., Winkowska-Nowak, K., Brée, D. (eds) Complex Human Dynamics. Understanding Complex Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31436-0_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31436-0_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31435-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31436-0

  • eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics