Skip to main content

How Fuzzy Is My Fuzzy Description Logic?

  • Conference paper
Automated Reasoning (IJCAR 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7364))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Fuzzy Description Logics (DLs) with t-norm semantics have been studied as a means for representing and reasoning with vague knowledge. Recent work has shown that even fairly inexpressive fuzzy DLs become undecidable for a wide variety of t-norms. We complement those results by providing a class of t-norms and an expressive fuzzy DL for which ontology consistency is linearly reducible to crisp reasoning, and thus has its same complexity. Surprisingly, in these same logics crisp models are insufficient for deciding fuzzy subsumption.

Partially supported by the DFG under grant BA 1122/17-1 and in the Collaborative Research Center 912 ā€œHighly Adaptive Energy-Efficient Computingā€.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P.F.: The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications. Cambridge University Press (2003)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  2. Baader, F., PeƱaloza, R.: Are fuzzy description logics with general concept inclusion axioms decidable? In: Proc. of the 2011 IEEE Int. Conf. on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE 2011), pp. 1735ā€“1742. IEEE Press (2011)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  3. Baader, F., PeƱaloza, R.: GCIs make reasoning in fuzzy DLs with the product t-norm undecidable. In: Rosati, R., Rudolph, S., Zakharyaschev, M. (eds.) Proc. of the 24th Int. Workshop on Description Logics (DL 2011), Barcelona, Spain. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol.Ā 745 (2011)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  4. Baader, F., PeƱaloza, R.: On the Undecidability of Fuzzy Description Logics with GCIs and Product T-norm. In: Tinelli, C., Sofronie-Stokkermans, V. (eds.) FroCos 2011. LNCS (LNAI), vol.Ā 6989, pp. 55ā€“70. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    ChapterĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  5. Bobillo, F., Bou, F., Straccia, U.: On the failure of the finite model property in some fuzzy description logics. Fuzzy Sets and SystemsĀ 172(23), 1ā€“12 (2011)

    ArticleĀ  MathSciNetĀ  MATHĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  6. Bobillo, F., Delgado, M., GĆ³mez-Romero, J., Straccia, U.: Fuzzy description logics under Gƶdel semantics. International Journal of Approximate ReasoningĀ 50(3), 494ā€“514 (2009)

    ArticleĀ  MathSciNetĀ  MATHĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  7. Bobillo, F., Straccia, U.: A fuzzy description logic with product t-norm. In: Proc. of the 2007 IEEE Int. Conf. on Fuzzy Systems FUZZ-IEEE 2007, pp. 1ā€“6. IEEE Press (2007)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  8. Bobillo, F., Straccia, U.: On qualified cardinality restrictions in fuzzy description logics under Łukasiewicz semantics. In: Proc. of the 12th Int. Conf. on Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems (IPMU 2008), pp. 1008ā€“1015 (2008)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  9. Bobillo, F., Straccia, U.: Fuzzy description logics with general t-norms and datatypes. Fuzzy Sets and SystemsĀ 160(23), 3382ā€“3402 (2009)

    ArticleĀ  MathSciNetĀ  MATHĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  10. Borgwardt, S., PeƱaloza, R.: Undecidability of fuzzy description logics. In: Proc. of the 13th Int. Conf. on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 2012), Rome, Italy. AAAI Press (to appear, 2012)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  11. Cerami, M., Straccia, U.: On the undecidability of fuzzy description logics with GCIs with Łukasiewicz t-norm. Technical report, Computing Research Repository (2011), arXiv:1107.4212v3 [cs.LO]

    Google ScholarĀ 

  12. GarcĆ­a-CerdaƱa, Ɓ., Armengol, E., Esteva, F.: Fuzzy description logics and t-norm based fuzzy logics. International Journal of Approximate ReasoningĀ 51, 632ā€“655 (2010)

    ArticleĀ  MathSciNetĀ  MATHĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  13. HƔjek, P.: Metamathematics of Fuzzy Logic (Trends in Logic). Springer (2001)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  14. HĆ”jek, P.: Making fuzzy description logic more general. Fuzzy Sets and SystemsĀ 154(1), 1ā€“15 (2005)

    ArticleĀ  MathSciNetĀ  MATHĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  15. Hladik, J.: A tableau system for the description logic \(\mathcal{SHIO}\). In: Proceedings of the Doctoral Programme of IJCAR 2004. CEUR Worksop Proceedings, vol.Ā 106, pp. 21ā€“25 (2004)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  16. Horrocks, I., Sattler, U., Tobies, S.: A PSpace-algorithm for deciding \(\mathcal{ALCNI}_{R^+}\)-satisfiability. LTCS-Report 98-08, RWTH Aachen, Germany (1998)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  17. Klement, E.P., Mesiar, R., Pap, E.: Triangular Norms. Springer (2000)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  18. Lukasiewicz, T., Straccia, U.: Managing uncertainty and vagueness in description logics for the semantic web. Journal of Web SemanticsĀ 6(4), 291ā€“308 (2008)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  19. Lutz, C., Areces, C., Horrocks, I., Sattler, U.: Keys, nominals, and concrete domains. Journal of Artificial Intelligence ResearchĀ 23, 667ā€“726 (2004)

    MathSciNetĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  20. Molitor, R., Tresp, C.B.: Extending Description Logics to Vague Knowledge in Medicine. In: Szczepaniak, P., Lisboa, P.J.G., Tsumoto, S. (eds.) Fuzzy Systems in Medicine. STUDFUZZ, vol.Ā 41, pp. 617ā€“635. Springer (2000)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  21. Mostert, P.S., Shields, A.L.: On the structure of semigroups on a compact manifold with boundary. Annals of MathematicsĀ 65, 117ā€“143 (1957)

    ArticleĀ  MathSciNetĀ  MATHĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  22. Stoilos, G., Stamou, G.B.: A framework for reasoning with expressive continuous fuzzy description logics. In: Grau, B.C., Horrocks, I., Motik, B., Sattler, U. (eds.) Proc. of the 22nd Int. Workshop on Description Logics (DL 2009). CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol.Ā 477 (2009)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  23. Stoilos, G., Stamou, G.B., Tzouvaras, V., Pan, J.Z., Horrocks, I.: The fuzzy description logic f-\(\mathcal{SHIN}\). In: Proc. of the 1st Int. Workshop on Uncertainty Reasoning for the Semantic Web (URSW 2005), pp. 67ā€“76 (2005)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  24. Stoilos, G., Straccia, U., Stamou, G.B., Pan, J.Z.: General concept inclusions in fuzzy description logics. In: Proc. of the 17th Eur. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI 2006). Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol.Ā 141, pp. 457ā€“461. IOS Press (2006)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  25. Straccia, U.: Reasoning within fuzzy description logics. Journal of Artificial Intelligence ResearchĀ 14, 137ā€“166 (2001)

    MathSciNetĀ  MATHĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  26. Straccia, U., Bobillo, F.: Mixed integer programming, general concept inclusions and fuzzy description logics. In: Proc. of the 5th EUSFLAT Conf (EUSFLAT 2007), pp. 213ā€“220. Universitas Ostraviensis (2007)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  27. Tresp, C.B., Molitor, R.: A description logic for vague knowledge. In: Proc. of the 13th Eur. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI 1998), Brighton, UK, pp. 361ā€“365. J. Wiley and Sons (1998)

    Google ScholarĀ 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

Ā© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Borgwardt, S., Distel, F., PeƱaloza, R. (2012). How Fuzzy Is My Fuzzy Description Logic?. In: Gramlich, B., Miller, D., Sattler, U. (eds) Automated Reasoning. IJCAR 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7364. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31365-3_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31365-3_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31364-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31365-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics