Skip to main content

Susceptibility Maps for Landslides Using Different Modelling Approaches

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

This study focuses on the comparison of different approaches for landslide susceptibility modelling and is part of the research project “MoNOE” (Method development for landslide susceptibility modelling in Lower Austria). The main objective of the project is to design a method for landslide susceptibility modelling for a large study area. For other objectives of the project we refer to Bell et al. (Proceedings of the 2nd world landslide forum, Rome, 3–7 Oct 2011, this volume). To reach the main objective, the two different statistical models “Weights of Evidence” and “Logistic Regression” are applied and compared. By using nearly the same input data in test areas it is possible to compare the capabilities of both methods. First results of the comparison indicate that in valleys and on south facing slopes the results are quite similar. In contrast, the analysis on north facing slopes shows differences. In the ongoing work the reasons for these differences will be analysed. Furthermore, attention will be paid to finding adequate validation methods for the two modelling approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Atkinson P, Jiskoot H, Massari R, Murray T (1998) Generalized linear modelling in geomorphology. Earth Sur Proc Land 23(13):1185–1195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayalew L, Yamagishi H (2005) The application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kakuda-Yahiko Mountains, Central Japan. Geomorphology 65(1–2):15–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell R, Glade T, Granica K, Heiss G, Leopold P, Petschko H, Pomaroli G, Proske H, Schweigl J (this volume) Landslide susceptibility maps for spatial planning in Lower Austria. In: Proceedings of the 2nd world landslide forum, 3–7 Oct 2011, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonham-Carter GF, Agterberg FP, Wright DF (1989) Weights of evidence modelling: a new approach to mapping mineral potential. Stat Appl Earth Sci 89(9):171–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenning A (2005) Spatial prediction models for landslide hazards: review, comparison and evaluation. Nat Hazard Earth Syst Sci 5:853–862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruden DM, Varnes DJ (1996) Landslide types and processes. In: Turner AK, Schuster RL (eds): Landslides – investigation and mitigation. Transportation Research Board Special Report 247. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp 36–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenness J (2006) Topographic position index (tpi_jen.avx) extension for arcview 3.x, v. 1.2. Jenness Enterprises. http://www.jennessent.com/arcview/tpi.htm. Last accessed 16th June 2011

  • Neuhäuser B, Terhorst B (2006) Landslide susceptibility assessment using weights-of-evidence applied on a study site at the Jurassic escarpement of the Swabian Alb (SW-Germany). Geomorphology 86:12–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petschko H, Bell R, Leopold P, Heiss, G, Glade T (this volume) Landslide inventories for reliable susceptibility maps in Lower Austria. In: Proceedings of the 2nd world landslide forum, Rome, 3–7 Oct 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi M, Guzzetti F, Reichenbach P, Mondini AC, Peruccacci S (2010) Optimal landslide susceptibility zonation based on multiple forecasts. Geomorphology 114(3):129–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawatzky DL, Raines GL, Bonham-Carter GF, Looney CG (2009) Spatial data modeller (SDM). ArcMAP 9.3 geoprocessing tools for spatial data modelling using weights of evidence, logistic regression, fuzzy logic and neural networks. http://arcscripts.esri.com/details.asp?dbid=15341. Last accessed 16th June 2011

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was performed within the MoNOE project, which is funded by the provincial government of Lower Austria. The input of all MoNOE partners was very supportive and is highly appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philip Leopold .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Leopold, P., Heiss, G., Petschko, H., Bell, R., Glade, T. (2013). Susceptibility Maps for Landslides Using Different Modelling Approaches. In: Margottini, C., Canuti, P., Sassa, K. (eds) Landslide Science and Practice. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31325-7_46

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics