Advertisement

Physical Modelling of the Propagation of Rock Avalanches: Recent Developments and Results

  • Claire SauthierEmail author
  • Vincent Labiouse
Chapter

Abstract

Rock avalanches are studied at the Laboratory for Rock Mechanics of EPF Lausanne by means of unconstrained flow experiments of dry granular material. Tests aim at studying the influence of different parameters on the propagation and deposition mechanisms as well as on the characteristics of the final deposit. The existing measurement system, based on the fringe projection method, was improved in order to increase the quality and the reliability of the volume measurement and the computation of the centre of mass of the final deposit. The latest developments allow using this method to follow the mass during its motion. Additionally, a new technique that allows tracking the mass front was set up and compared to previous results gathered with the commercial software WINAnalyze. Results of experiments carried out with a gravel supposed to have the same characteristics as the one used in a previous research study Manzella (2008 Dry rock avalanche propagation: unconstrained flow experiments with granular materials and blocks at small scale. Ph.D. thesis 4032, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland) showed some differences, suggesting that the grading of the material has a certain influence on the runout and the position of the centre of mass of the final deposit. A more significant difference is related to the state of the propagation surface. Recent experiments with a curved transition at the bottom of the slope and a larger volume lead to new results. Contrary to previous observations, for a given falling height of the source base, the distance travelled by the centre of mass on the horizontal panel increases with the volume. This leads to discuss further some conclusions previously drawn.

Keywords

Rock avalanches Physical modelling Runout Fringe projection method Mass front tracking 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Swiss National Science Foundation for funding this research project. Further acknowledgements go to Dr. Equis for his help in the improvement and extension of the measurement system, as well as for his careful review of the third part of this paper. M. Mattheeuws for proofreading this article. Jean-Marc Terraz, Laurent Morier, Michel Teuscher and Laurent Gastaldo for designing and modifying the experimental set-up. Thomas Badoz, Emilie Decrausaz, Mathilde Charrier, Gabriele Pisani, Bastien Ferrot and Laurent Gastaldo for their help during the experimental campaign.

References

  1. Aebischer HA, Waldner S (1999) Simple and effective method for filtering speckle interferometric phase fringe patterns. Opt Commun 162(4–6):205–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cochard S, Ancey C (2007) Tracking the free surface of time-dependant flows: image processing for the dam-break problem. Exp Fluids 44(1):59–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Davies TRH (1982) Spreading of rock avalanche debris by mechanical fluidization. Rock Mech 15(1):9–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Davies TRH, McSaveney MJ (1999) Runout of dry granular avalanches. Can Geotech J 36(2):313–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Davies TRH, McSaveney MJ (2003) Runout of rock avalanches and volcanic debris avalanches. In: Proceeding of the international conference on fast slope movements, vol 2. Naples, 11–13 May 2003Google Scholar
  6. Equis S, Jacquot P (2009) The empirical mode decomposition: a must-have tool in speckle interferometry? Opt Express 17(2):611–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Huang NE, Shen Z, Long SR, Wu MC, Shih HH, Zheng Q, Yen N-C, Tung CC, Liu HH (1998) The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis. Proc R Soc Lond A 454:903–995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hungr O (1990) Mobility of rock avalanches. National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention, Report 46, Tsukuba, pp 72–93Google Scholar
  9. Iverson RM, Logan M, Denlinger RP (2004) Granular avalanches across irregular three-dimensional terrain 2. Experimental tests. J Geophys Res–Earth Surf 109: F01015, 16pp, doi:10.1029/2003JF000084Google Scholar
  10. Manzella I (2008) Dry rock avalanche propagation: unconstrained flow experiments with granular materials and blocks at small scale. Ph.D. thesis 4032, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  11. Manzella I, Labiouse V (2008) Extension of the fringe projection method to measure shape and position of the centre of mass of granular flow deposit. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference of international association for computer methods and advances in geomechanics (IACMAG), Goa, 1–6 Oct 2008, pp 4547–4554Google Scholar
  12. Manzella I, Labiouse V (2009) Flow experiments with gravel and blocks at small scale to investigate parameters and mechanisms involved in rock avalanches. Eng Geol 109(1):146–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Sauthier C. Physical and numerical modelling of the propagation and spreading of dry rock avalanches. Ph.D. thesis in progress, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland (in progress)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory for Rock Mechanics (LMR)Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), EPFL-ENAC-LMRLausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations