Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Atlas of PET/MR Imaging in Oncology
  • 2100 Accesses

Abstract

Following the path of clinical applications of hybrid PET-CT it would seem logical that PET-MR can provide an innovative and attractive alternative taking full advantage of the superiority of MR over CT in differentiating soft tissue characteristics with a reduction in radiation exposure by replacing the CT with MR. The challenges of PET-MR are however, still numerous both on the technical side as on the practical and clinical side.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Further Reading

  • Antoch G, Bockisch A (2009) Combined PET/MRI: a new dimension in whole-body oncology imaging? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 36 Suppl 1:S113–S120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Antoch G, Saoudi N, Kuehl H et al (2004) Accuracy of whole-body dual-modality fluorine-18-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) for tumor staging in solid tumors: comparison with CT and PET. J Clin Oncol 22:4357–4368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Shalom R, Yefremov N, Guralnik L et al (2003) Clinical ­performance of PET/CT in evaluation of cancer: additional value for diagnostic imaging and patient management. J Nucl Med 44:1200–1209

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beyer T, Pichler B (2009) A decade of combined imaging: from a PET attached to a CT to a PET inside an MR. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 36 Suppl 1:S1–S2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beyer T, Weigert M, Quick HH et al (2008) MR-based attenuation correction for torso-PET/MR imaging: pitfalls in mapping MR to CT data. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 35:1142–1146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Jian W, Li HT et al (2010) Whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging vs. FDG-PET for the detection of non-small-cell lung cancer. How do they measure up? Magn Reson Imaging 28:613–620

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Collins CD (2007) PET/CT in oncology: for which tumours is it the reference standard? Cancer Imaging 7 Spec No A:S77–S87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Czernin J, Allen-Auerbach M, Schelbert HR (2007) Improvements in cancer staging with PET/CT: literature-based evidence as of September 2006. J Nucl Med 48 Suppl 1:78S–88S

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Delso G, Ziegler S (2009) PET/MRI system design. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 36 Suppl 1:S86–S92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heusner TA, Kuemmel S, Umutlu L et al (2008) Breast cancer staging in a single session: whole-body PET/CT mammography. J Nucl Med 49:1215–1222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heusner TA, Kuemmel S, Koeninger A et al (2010) Diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) compared to FDG PET/CT for whole-body breast cancer staging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 37(6):1077–1086

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann M, Pichler B, Scholkopf B, Beyer T (2009) Towards quantitative PET/MRI: a review of MR-based attenuation correction techniques. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 36 Suppl 1:S93–S104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hu Z, Ojha N, Renisch S et al (2009) MR-based attenuation correction for a whole-body sequential PET/MR system. In: IEEE nuclear ­science symposium conference record, Orlando, 2009, pp 3508–3512

    Google Scholar 

  • Lonsdale MN, Beyer T (2010) Dual-modality PET/CT instrumentation-today and tomorrow. Eur J Radiol 73:452–460

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Punwani S, Taylor SA, Bainbridge A et al (2010) Pediatric and adolescent lymphoma: comparison of whole-body STIR half-Fourier RARE MR imaging with an enhanced PET/CT reference for initial staging. Radiology 255:182–190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt GP, Reiser MF, Baur-Melnyk A (2009) Whole-body MRI for the staging and follow-up of patients with metastasis. Eur J Radiol 70:393–400

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shao Y, Cherry SR, Farahani K et al (1997) Simultaneous PET and MR imaging. Phys Med Biol 42:1965–1970

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O. Ratib .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ratib, O., Schwaiger, M. (2013). Introduction. In: Ratib, O., Schwaiger, M., Beyer, T. (eds) Atlas of PET/MR Imaging in Oncology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31292-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31292-2_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31291-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31292-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics