Skip to main content

Analyzing Query Logs of USPTO Examiners to Identify Useful Query Terms in Patent Documents for Query Expansion in Patent Searching: A Preliminary Study

  • Conference paper
Multidisciplinary Information Retrieval (IRFC 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 7356))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In an attempt to improve retrieval systems for the patent domain, significant efforts are invested to assist researchers in formulating better queries, preferably via automated query generation. Current work on query generation in patent retrieval is mostly based on statistical measures without considering whether these terms are the best choice. To learn from actual queries being posed by experts, we analyze query logs from USPTO patent examiners. Results show that US examiners pick the majority of query terms from the claim section, a large fraction of which, in turn, coincide with the subject feature terms which determine the extent of the protection of the patent right. Considering the lessons learned from evaluating existing search logs will help in improving (semi-) automated query generation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amitay, E., Broder, A.: Introduction to special issue on query log analysis: Technology and Ethics. ACM Trans. Web 2, Article 18 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ballesteros, L., Croft, W.: Phrasal translation and query expansion techniques for cross-language information retrieval. In: Proc. of SIGIR 1997, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, pp. 84–91 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Clough, P., Berendt, B.: Report on the Treble CLEF query log analysis workshop 2009. SIGIR Forum 43, 71–77 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. European Patent Office. Guidelines for Examination in the European Patent Office (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. European Patent Office. How to get a European patent – Guide for Applicants Part 1, 13th edn. (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fujita, S.: Technology survey and invalidity search: An comparative study of different tasks for Japanese patent document retrieval. Information Processing and Management, An International Journal, 1154–1172 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Garside, R., Smith, N.: A hybrid grammatical tagger: CLAWS4. In: Garside, R., Leech, G., McEnery, A. (eds.) Corpus Annotation: Linguistic Information from Computer Text Corpora. Longman, London, pp. 102–121 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hunt, D., Nyugen, L., Rodgers, M.: Patent Searching: Tools & Techniques. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jochim, C., Lioma, C., Schütze, H., Koch, S., Ertl, T.: Preliminary study into query translation for patent retrieval. In: Proc. of PaIR 2011, Toronto, Canada, pp. 57–66 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Konishi, K.: Query terms extraction form Patent Documents for invalidity search. In: Proc. of NTCIR 2005: NTCIR-5 Workshop Meeting, Tokyo, Japan (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Magdy, W., Jones, G.J.F.: A Study of Query Expansion Methods for Patent Retrieval. In: Proc. of PaIR 2011, Glasgow, Scotland, pp. 19–24 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Magdy, W., Leveling, J., Jones, G.J.F.: Exploring Structured Documents and Query Formulation Techniques for Patent Retrieval. In: Peters, C., Di Nunzio, G.M., Kurimo, M., Mostefa, D., Penas, A., Roda, G. (eds.) CLEF 2009. LNCS, vol. 6241, pp. 410–417. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Murray, G.C., Teevan, J.: Query log analysis: Social and technological challenges. SIGIR Forum 41, 112–120 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Silvestri, F.: Mining Query Logs: Turning Search Usage Data into Knowledge. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval 4(1-2), 1–174 (2010)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Silverstein, C., Marais, H., Henzinger, M., Moricz, M.: Analysis of a very large web search engine query log. SIGIR Forum 33, 6–12 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Torres, S., Hiemstra, D., Serdyukov, P.: Query log analysis in the context of information retrieval for children. In: Proc. of SIGIR 2010, Geneva, Switzerland, pp. 847–848 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tyler, S., Teevan, J.: Large scale query log analysis of re-finding. In: Proc. of WSDM 2010, New York, USA, pp. 191–200 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Xue, X., Croft, W.: Automatic query generation for patent search. In: Proc. of CIKM 2009, Hong Kong, China, pp. 2037–2040 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Xue, X., Croft, W.: Transforming patents into prior-art queries. In: Proc. of SIGIR 2009, Boston, USA, pp. 808–880 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang, Z., Yang, M., Li, S., Qi, H., Song, C.: Sogou Query Log Analysis: A Case Study for Collaborative Recommendation or Personalized IR. In: Proc. of IALP 2009, Singapore, pp. 304–307 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tannebaum, W., Rauber, A. (2012). Analyzing Query Logs of USPTO Examiners to Identify Useful Query Terms in Patent Documents for Query Expansion in Patent Searching: A Preliminary Study. In: Salampasis, M., Larsen, B. (eds) Multidisciplinary Information Retrieval. IRFC 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7356. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31274-8_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31274-8_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31273-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31274-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics