Business Success in Software SMEs: Recommendations for Future SPI Studies
There is presently insufficient data regarding the relationship between software process improvement (SPI) and business success, a fact which may reduce process prioritisation in software development in practice. To assist future studies examining the relationship between SPI and business success, we developed a new two-phased approach to examining business success. The first phase involves the elicitation of business objectives for the forthcoming year, with the second phase determining the extent of achievement of the recorded objectives. At EuroSPI 2011, we described the two-phased approach in detail and reported on the findings from deploying the first phase of the examination to software developing small- and medium-sized enterprises (software SMEs). In this follow-up paper, we report on the findings from the second phase of the investigation in the participating software SMEs, formulating an additional important new recommendation for future studies.
KeywordsSoftware Process Improvement Business Success Software SMEs
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Pall, G.: Quality process management. Prentice Hall, NJ (1987)Google Scholar
- 5.Sanders, M. (ed.): The SPIRE handbook. better, faster, cheaper software development in small organisations. Centre for Software Engineering Limited, DCU, Dublin, Ireland (1998)Google Scholar
- 13.Ansoff, H.I.: Corporate strategy. McGraw-Hill, New York (1965)Google Scholar
- 19.Lynch, R.L., Cross, K.F.: Measure up! yardstick for continuous improvement. Basil Blackwell, Cambridge (1990)Google Scholar
- 20.Brown, M.G.: Keeping score: Using the right metrics to drive world-class performance. Quality Resources (1996)Google Scholar
- 22.Neely, A.D., Adams, C., Kennerley, M.: The performance prism: The scorecard for measuring and managing business success. Prentice Hall, London (2002)Google Scholar
- 23.Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P.: The Balanced Scorecard - Measures that Drive Performance. Harvard Business Review 70(1), 71–79 (1992)Google Scholar
- 24.Kennerley, M., Neely, A.: Performance measurement frameworks: A review. In: Business Performance Measurement - Theory and Practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)Google Scholar
- 27.Chow, C.W., Haddad, K.M., Williamson, J.E.: Applying the BSC to Small Companies. Management Accounting 79(2), 21–27 (1997)Google Scholar
- 28.Andersen, H., Cobbold, I., Lawrie, G.: BSC implementation in SMEs: reflection in literature and practice. In: Proceedings of the fourth SMESME Conference, pp. 103–112. Department of Production, 2GC Limited. Aalborg University, 9220 Aalborg, Denmark (2001)Google Scholar
- 30.European Commission: Commission Recommendation of 6 may 2003 Concerning the Definition of Micro, Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises. 2003/361/EC. Journal of the European Union L(124), 36–41 (2003)Google Scholar
- 31.Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y.: An e-business model ontology for modeling e-business. In: Bled Electronic Commerce Conference, pp. 75–91 (2002)Google Scholar