Advertisement

Structuring Political Documents for Importance Ranking

  • Alexander Hogenboom
  • Maarten Jongmans
  • Flavius Frasincar
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7337)

Abstract

Today’s parliamentary information systems make political data available to the public in an effective and efficient way by moving from the classical document-centric model to a rich information-centric model for political data. We propose a novel approach to exploiting the rich information sources available through such parliamentary information systems for ranking results of a typical query for debates in accordance with their importance, for which we have developed several proxies. Our initial evaluation indicates that debate intensity and key players have an important role in signaling the importance of a debate.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Brin, S., Page, L.: The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine. In: 7th International World-Wide Web Conference (WWW 1998), pp. 107–117. Elsevier (1998)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Frasincar, F., Borsje, J., Levering, L.: A Semantic Web-Based Approach for Building Personalized News Services. International Journal of E-Business Research 5(3), 35–53 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gielissen, T., Marx, M.: Exemelification of Parliamentary Debates. In: Ninth Dutch-Belgian Workshop on Information Retrieval (DIR 2009), pp. 19–25 (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gielissen, T., Marx, M.: The design of PoliDocs: a Web Information System for the Disclosure of Dutch Parliamentary Publications. In: Sixth International Workshop on Web Information Systems Modeling (WISM 2009), vol. 461. CEUR-WS (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Grijzenhout, S., Jijkoun, V., Marx, M.: Sentiment Analysis in Parliamentary Proceedings. In: Workshop From Text to Political Positions, T2PP 2010 (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kaptein, R., Marx, M.: Focused Retrieval and Result Aggregation with Political Data. Information Retrieval 13(5), 412–433 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kleinberg, J., Kumar, R., Raghavan, P., Rajagopalan, S., Tomkin, A.: The Web as a Graph: Measurements, Models, and Methods. Springer (1999)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Marcella, R., Baxter, G., Moor, N.: The Effectiveness of Parliamentary Information Services in the United Kingdom. Government Information Quarterly 20(1), 29–46 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Smith, A.: The Internet’s Role in Campaign 2008. Tech. rep., Pew Internet and American Life Project (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexander Hogenboom
    • 1
  • Maarten Jongmans
    • 1
  • Flavius Frasincar
    • 1
  1. 1.Erasmus University RotterdamRotterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations