Abstract
In less than a decade, several millions of articles have been written in Wikipedia and several million roads have been traced out on Open Street Map (OSM). In the meantime, the authorities have still not been able to understand and use the power of crowd sourcing. In this paper, we present the design principles of a new Public Participation Geographic Information System (PPGIS). We aim to eliminate the typical limitations of previous unsuccessful platforms, that have mostly failed due to conceptual design issues.
We argue that two fundamental changes must exist in new PPGIS platforms: there is a shift from hierarchies to increased equal rights platforms; improved communication, more transparency, and bi-directionality.
The role of the authority in former platforms was really an authoritarian role: having all the power and only partly knowing and controlling the entire platform. This is completely different from the crowd source platforms we know to be successful. So, one fundamental change is to diminish hierarchies and prevent people from hiding themselves behind the institution.
The second major conceptual design issue is related to transparency and communication. While former platforms use mechanisms to prevent citizens from seeing each other’s participation, we aim to enable people to see the participation of others. That’s a fundamental feature in social networks. We will also design it to be a two-way communication platform. If citizens are requested to participate, the administration must use the same platform to communicate with them. Not only to provide feedback, but also to publish useful information for the citizen.
In this paper we describe how social media meets our design principles. We decide to implement our case study, the “Fix my Street” application, on top of a social engine, to take advantage of all social media features. Two necessary extensions to the social engine are briefly described, to capture the core logic of our application.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Coleman, D.J., Eng, P.: Volunteered Geographic Information in Spatial Data Infrastructure: An Early Look At Opportnities And Constraints, pp. 1–18
Craig, W., Harris, T., Weiner, D.: Empowerment, Marginalization and Public Participation GIS Report of Varenius Workshop Compiled by. Number (February 1999)
Elwood, S.: Geographic information science: emerging research on the societal implications of the geospatial web. Progress in Human Geography 34(3), 349–357 (2009)
Girres, J.-F., Touya, G.: Quality Assessment of the French OpenStreetMap Dataset. Transactions in GIS 14(4), 435–459 (2010)
Goodchild, M., Alan Glennon, J.: Crowdsourcing geographic information for disaster response: a research frontier. International Journal of Digital Earth 3(3), 231–241 (2010)
Goodchild, M.F.: Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal 69(4), 211–221 (2007)
Haklay, M., Basiouka, S., Antoniou, V., Ather, A.: How Many Volunteers Does it Take to Map an Area Well? The Validity of Linus Law to Volunteered Geographic Information. The Cartographic Journal 47(4), 315–322 (2010)
Hanzl, M.: Information technology as a tool for public participation in urban planning: a review of experiments and potentials. Design Studies 28(3), 289–307 (2007)
Hudson-smith, A., Batty, M., Crooks, A., Milton, R.: Mapping for the Masses: Accessing Web 2.0 through Crowdsourcing. Analysis 44(0), 0–18 (2008)
Innes, J.E., Booher, D.E.: Reframing public participation: strategies for the 21st century. Planning Theory & Practice 5(4), 419–436 (2004)
Ostlaender, N., Smith, R.S., De Longueville, B., Smits, P.: What Volunteered Geographic Information is (good for)-designing a methodology for comparative analysis of existing applications to classify VGI and its uses. Remote Sensing 817, 1422–1425 (2010)
Song, W., Sun, G.: The Role of Mobile Volunteered Geographic Information in Urban Management. Context
Zielstra, D., Zipf, A.: A comparative study of proprietary geodata and volunteered geographic information for germany. In: 13th AGILE International Conference on Geographic Information Science (2010)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Silva, A., Rocha, J.G. (2012). Towards a Two-Way Participatory Process. In: Murgante, B., et al. Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2012. ICCSA 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7333. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31125-3_43
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31125-3_43
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31124-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31125-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)