Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Die Zukunft der Führung pp 557–572Cite as

Geteilte Führung in Arbeitsgruppen – ein Modell für die Zukunft?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Zusammenfassung

Wer meint, nur Vorgesetzte führen in Gruppen, dem bietet dieses Kapitel einen erweiterten Blickwinkel. Denn neben der klassischen Führung von oben, sollten die Dynamik in der Arbeitsgruppe und das Potenzial einer geteilten Führung durch die Gruppenmitglieder nicht missachtet bleiben. Ein Modell für die Zukunft? – Ganz gewiss! Denn die aktuelle Forschung zeigt, dass die neue Form der Führung eine gewinnbringende Ressource für verschiedene Erfolgsparameter der Arbeitsgruppe sein kann. Im folgenden Kapitel wird dem Leser das Konzept der geteilten Führung näher gebracht. Nach einem Überblick über die aktuelle Forschung werden zusätzlich Hinweise für die erfolgreiche Implementierung dieser Führungsform gegeben.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Avolio, B. J., Jung, D., Murry, W., & Sivasubramaniam, N. (1996). Building highly developed teams: Focusing on shared leadership processes, efficacy, trust and performance. In M. M. Beyerlein, D. A. Johnson, & S. T. Beyerlein (Hrsg.), Advances in interdisciplinary study of work teams (Bd. 3, S. 173–209). Greenwich: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. (1995). MLQ multifactor leadership questionnaire. technical report. Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brauner, E. (2003). Informationsverarbeitung in Gruppen: Transaktive Wissenssysteme. In S. Stumpf & A. Thomas (Hrsg.), Teamarbeit und Teamentwicklung (S. 57–83). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 499–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ensley, M. D., Hmieleski, K. M., & Pearce, C. L. (2006). The importance of vertical and shared leadership within new venture top management teams: Implications for the performance of startups. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 217–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, J., & Feuerstein, H.-J. (2010). Dokumentation zum Symposium: Teamkonzepte für die öffentliche Verwaltung, Linx, Februar 1010 (unveröff. Manuskript).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gully, S. M., Incalcaterra, K. A., Joshi, A., & Beaubien, J. M. (2002). A meta-analysis of team efficacy, potency, and performance: Interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 819–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harkins, S. G., Latané, B., & Williams, K. (1980). Social loafing: Allocating effort or taking it easy? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 457–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollander, E. P. (1978). Leadership dynamics: A practical guide to effective relationships. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houghton, J. D., Neck, C. P., & Manz, C. C. (2003). Self-leadership and superleadership: The heart and art of creating shared leadership in teams. In C. L. Pearce & J. A. Conger (Hrsg.), Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership (S. 123−140). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., & Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A metaanalytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 755–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, S., & Jermier, J. M. (1978). Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 22, 375–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, C. L. (1997). The determinants of change management team effectiveness: A longitudinal investigation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Maryland-College Park.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, C. L., & Conger, J. A. (2003). All those years ago: The historical underpinnings of shared leadership. In C. L. Pearce & J. A. Conger (Hrsg.), Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership (S. 1–18). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, C. L., & Sims, H. P. (2002). Vertical versus shared leadership as predictors of the effectiveness of change management teams: An examination of aversive, directive, transactional, transformational and empowering leader behaviors. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6, 172–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, C. L., Yoo, Y., & Alavi, M. (2004). Leadership, social work, and virtual teams: the relative influence of vertical versus shared leadership in the nonprofit sector. In R. Riggio, & S. S. Orr (Hrsg.), Improving leadership in nonprofit organizations (S. 180–203). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piecha, A., & Wegge, J. (in prep.). Validation of short scales for assessing vertical and shared leadership in teams.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamir, B., & Lapidot, Y. (2003). Shared leadership in the management of group boundaries: A study of expulsions from officers’ training courses. In: C. L. Pearce & J. A. Conger (Hrsg.), Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership. (S. 235–249). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Solansky, S. (2008). Leadership style and team processes in self-managed teams. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 14, 332–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spector, P. E. (1986). Perceived control by employees: A meta-analysis of studies concerning autonomy and participation at work. Human Relations, 39, 1005–1016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut, J., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegge, J. (2004). Führung von Arbeitsgruppen. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegge, J., Jeppesen, H.-J., Weber, W. G., Pearce, C. L., Silva, S., Pundt, A., Jonsson, T., Wolf, S., Wassenaar, C. L., Unterrainer, C., & Piecha, A. (2010). Promoting work motivation in organizations: Should employee involvement in organizational leadership become a new tool in the organizational psychologists’ armory? Journal of Personnel Psychology, 9, 154–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wunderer, R., & Grunwald, W. (1980). Führungslehre. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Technischen Universität Dresden, Professur für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, Dresden, Deutschland

    Annika Piecha, Jürgen Wegge & Peter G. Richter

  2. Universität Hohenheim, Lehrstuhl für Wirtschafts- und Organisationspsychologie, Stuttgart, Deutschland

    Lioba Werth

Authors
  1. Annika Piecha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jürgen Wegge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lioba Werth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Peter G. Richter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Annika Piecha .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Unternehmensberatung, Jasperallee 53, Braunschweig, 38102, Germany

    Sven Grote

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Piecha, A., Wegge, J., Werth, L., Richter, P. (2012). Geteilte Führung in Arbeitsgruppen – ein Modell für die Zukunft?. In: Grote, S. (eds) Die Zukunft der Führung. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31052-2_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31052-2_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31051-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31052-2

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation