Skip to main content

Benign and Malignant Mesenchymal Tumors of the Uterus

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

1. At the beginning of the third week, an opacity formed by a thickened linear band of epiblast – the primitive streak – appears caudally in the median plane of the dorsal aspect of the embryonic disc.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Andersen J (1998) Factors in fibroid growth. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol 12(2):225–243

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cramer SF, Patel A (1990) The frequency of uterine leiomyomas. Am J Clin Pathol 94(4):435–438

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kliewer MA et al (1995) Acoustic shadowing from uterine leiomyomas: sonographic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 196(1):99–102

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Caoili EM et al (2000) Refractory shadowing from pelvic masses on sonography: a useful diagnostic sign for uterine leiomyomas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174(1):97–101

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wamsteker K, Emanuel MH, de Kruif JH (1993) Transcervical hysteroscopic resection of submucous fibroids for abnormal uterine bleeding: results regarding the degree of intramural extension. Obstet Gynecol 82(5):736–740

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Salim R et al (2005) A comparative study of three-dimensional saline infusion sonohysterography and diagnostic hysteroscopy for the classification of submucous fibroids. Hum Reprod 20(1):253–257

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sahdev A et al (2001) MR imaging of uterine sarcomas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 177(6):1307–1311

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Torashima M et al (1998) The value of detection of flow voids between the uterus and the leiomyoma with MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 8(2):427–431

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Park BK et al (2006) Differentiation of the various lesions causing an abnormality of the endometrial cavity using MR imaging: emphasis on enhancement patterns on dynamic studies and late contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images. Eur Radiol 16(7):1591–1598

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. O’Connor DM, Norris HJ (1990) Mitotically active leiomyomas of the uterus. Hum Pathol 21(2):223–227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yamashita Y et al (1993) Hyperintense uterine leiomyoma at T2-weighted MR imaging: differentiation with dynamic enhanced MR imaging and clinical implications. Radiology 189(3):721–725

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Oguchi O et al (1995) Prediction of histopathologic features and proliferative activity of uterine leiomyoma by magnetic resonance imaging prior to GnRH analogue therapy: correlation between T2-weighted images and effect of GnRH analogue. J Obstet Gynaecol (Tokyo 1995) 21(2):107–117

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Zaloudek C (2001) Mesenchymal tumors of the uterus. In: Kurman RJ (ed) Blaustein’s pathology of the female genital tract, 5th edn. Springer, New York, pp 561–615

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tanaka YO et al (2004) Smooth muscle tumors of uncertain malignant potential and leiomyosarcomas of the uterus: MR findings. J Magn Reson Imaging 20(6):998–1007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Parker WH, Fu YS, Berek JS (1994) Uterine sarcoma in patients operated on for presumed leiomyoma and rapidly growing leiomyoma. Obstet Gynecol 83(3):414–418

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Exacoustos C et al (2007) Can gray-scale and color Doppler sonography ­differentiate between uterine leiomyosarcoma and leiomyoma? J Clin Ultrasound 35(8):449–457

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Aviram R et al (2005) Uterine sarcomas versus leiomyomas: gray-scale and Doppler sonographic findings. J Clin Ultrasound 33(1):10–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Goto A et al (2002) Usefulness of Gd-DTPA contrast-enhanced dynamic MRI and serum determination of LDH and its isozymes in the differential diagnosis of leiomyosarcoma from degenerated leiomyoma of the uterus. Int J Gynecol Cancer 12(4):354–361

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Tamai K et al (2008) The utility of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for differentiating uterine sarcomas from benign leiomyomas. Eur Radiol 18(4):723–730

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Namimoto T et al (2009) Combined use of T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted 3-T MR imaging for differentiating uterine sarcomas from benign leiomyomas. Eur Radiol 19(11):2756–2764

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pecorelli S (2009) Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 105(2):103–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. FIGO Committee on Gynecologic Oncology (2009) FIGO staging for uterine sarcomas. Prat J. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 104(3):177–178. Erratum in: Int J Gynaecol Obstet. Sep;106(3):277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Scully RE et al (1994) World Health Organization International histological classification of tumours, vol 2, Histological typing of female genital tract tumours. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  24. Koyama T et al (1999) MR imaging of endometrial stromal sarcoma: correlation with pathologic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 173(3):767–772

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ueda M et al (2000) Uterine endometrial stromal sarcoma located in uterine myometrium: MRI appearance. Eur Radiol 10(5):780–782

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ueda M et al (2001) MR imaging findings of uterine endometrial stromal ­sarcoma: differentiation from endometrial carcinoma. Eur Radiol 11(1):28–33

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Gandolfo N et al (2000) Endometrial stromal sarcoma of the uterus: MR and US findings. Eur Radiol 10(5):776–779

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Silverberg SG, Kurman RJ (1992) Endometrial stromal tumors: tumors of ­uterine corpus and gestational trophoblastic disease. In: Rosai J (ed) Atlas of tumors pathology, vol 3. AFIP, Washington, pp 91–112

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lamboley JL et al (2010) A rare tumor: endometrial stromal nodule. J Radiol 91(11 Pt 1):1161–1163

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Atri M et al (2000) Adenomyosis: US features with histologic correlation in an in-vitro study. Radiology 215(3):783–790

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kilickesmez O et al (2009) Quantitative diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of normal and diseased uterine zones. Acta Radiol 50(3):340–347

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Buy, J.N., Ghossain, M. (2013). Benign and Malignant Mesenchymal Tumors of the Uterus . In: Gynecological Imaging. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31012-6_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31012-6_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31011-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31012-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics