Manipulating Addictive Behaviour in Animal Models

  • Rolinka M. C. Schippers
  • Tommy Pattij
  • Taco J. De VriesEmail author


Drug addiction is a chronic relapsing disorder, characterized by compulsive use of drugs of abuse, loss of control in limiting intake and continuation of consumption despite negative consequences to health and the social environment. Despite the rapid development of imaging techniques that reveal brain activity changes in human addicts, animal models of addiction are indispensable for more in-depth analysis of the underlying neurobiological mechanisms at the cellular and molecular level and to explore novel treatment options. Such animal studies have contributed greatly to our knowledge on the immediate impact of drugs on behaviour and neurobiological mechanisms, the long-term effects of prolonged drug intake on these processes and the pharmacological and neuroanatomical aspects of drug-taking and drug-seeking. With increasing interest in using deep brain stimulation (DBS) for treatment of otherwise refractory drug dependence, animal models can help to define the optimal brain target for DBS and provide useful insights into the neurobiological mechanisms underlying the beneficial effects of DBS treatment. In this chapter, we discuss the validity of animal models of addiction and provide an overview of recent studies that applied DBS techniques to manipulate addictive behaviour in laboratory animals.


Deep Brain Stimulation Ventral Tegmental Area Conditioned Place Preference Dorsal Striatum Extinction Training 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Aguilar MA, Rodríguez-Arias M, Miñarro J (2009) Neurobiological mechanisms of the reinstatement of drug-conditioned place preference. Brain Res Rev 59:253–277PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baunez C, Dias C, Cador M, Amalric M (2005) The subthalamic nucleus exerts opposite control on cocaine and ‘natural’ rewards. Nat Neurosci 8:484–489PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Childs E, de Wit H (2009) Amphetamine-induced place preference in humans. Biol Psychiatry 65:900–904PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Davis WM, Smith SG (1976) Role of conditioned reinforcers in the initiation, maintenance and extinction of drug-seeking behavior. Pavlov J Biol Sci 11:222–236PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. De Vries TJ, de Vries W, Janssen MC, Schoffelmeer ANM (2005) Suppression of conditioned nicotine and sucrose seeking by the cannabinoid-1 receptor antagonist SR141716A. Behav Brain Res 161:164–168PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. de Wit H (1996) Priming effects with drugs and other reinforcers. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 4:5–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Di Pietro N, Mashhoon Y, Heaney C, Yager L, Kantak K (2008) Role of dopamine D1 receptors in the prefrontal dorsal agranular insular cortex in mediating cocaine self-administration in rats. Psychopharmacology 200:81–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Epstein D, Preston K, Stewart J, Shaham Y (2006) Toward a model of drug relapse: an assessment of the validity of the reinstatement procedure. Psychopharmacology 189:1–16PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Everitt BJ, Belin D, Economidou D, Pelloux Y, Dalley JW, Robbins TW (2008) Neural mechanisms underlying the vulnerability to develop compulsive drug-seeking habits and addiction. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 363:3125–3135PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fagerström K, Balfour DJ (2006) Neuropharmacology and potential efficacy of new treatments for tobacco dependence. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 15:107–116PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Forget B, Pushparaj A, Le Foll B (2010) Granular insular cortex inactivation as a novel therapeutic strategy for nicotine addiction. Biol Psychiatry 68:265–271PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Friedman A, Lax E, Dikshtein Y, Abraham L, Flaumenhaft Y, Sudai E, Ben-Tzion M, Ami-Ad L, Yaka R, Yadid G (2010) Electrical stimulation of the lateral habenula produces enduring inhibitory effect on cocaine seeking behavior. Neuropharmacology 59:452–459PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Friedman A, Lax E, Dikshtein Y, Abraham L, Flaumenhaft Y, Sudai E, Ben-Tzion M, Yadid G (2011) Electrical stimulation of the lateral habenula produces an inhibitory effect on sucrose self-administration. Neuropharmacology 60:381–387PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fuchs RA, Evans KA, Parker MC, See RE (2004) Differential involvement of the core and shell subregions of the nucleus accumbens in conditioned cue-induced reinstatement of cocaine seeking in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 176:459–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goldstein RZ, Volkow ND (2002) Drug addiction and its underlying neurobiological basis: neuroimaging evidence for the involvement of the frontal cortex. Am J Psychiatry 159:1642–1652PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Heidbreder CA, Groenewegen HJ (2003) The medial prefrontal cortex in the rat: evidence for a dorso-ventral distinction based upon functional and anatomical characteristics. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 27:555–579PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Henderson MB, Green AI, Bradford PS, Chau DT, Roberts DW, Leiter JC (2010) Deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens reduces alcohol intake in alcohol-preferring rats. Neurosurg Focus 29:E12PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hodos W (1961) Progressive ratio as a measure of reward strength. Science 134:943–944PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jentsch JD, Taylor JR (1999) Impulsivity resulting from frontostriatal dysfunction in drug abuse: implications for the control of behavior by reward-related stimuli. Psychopharmacology 146:373–390PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kalivas PW, Volkow ND (2005) The neural basis of addiction: a pathology of motivation and choice. Am J Psychiatry 162:1403–1413PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Knapp CM, Tozier L, Pak A, Ciraulo DA, Kornetsky C (2009) Deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens reduces ethanol consumption in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 92:474–479PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Koob GF, Volkow ND (2010) Neurocircuitry of addiction. Neuropsychopharmacology 35:217–238PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kuhn J, Lenartz D, Huff W, Lee S, Koulousakis A, Klosterkoetter J, Sturm V (2007) Remission of alcohol dependency following deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens: valuable therapeutic implications? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 78:1152–1153PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Levy D, Shabat-Simon M, Shalev U, Barnea-Ygael N, Cooper A, Zangen A (2007) Repeated electrical stimulation of reward-related brain regions affects cocaine but not “natural” reinforcement. J Neurosci 27:14179–14189PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Liu HY, Jin J, Tang JS, Sun WX, Jia H, Yang XP, Cui JM, Wang CG (2008) Chronic deep brain stimulation in the rat nucleus accumbens and its effect on morphine reinforcement. Addict Biol 13:40–46PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lu L, Ceng X, Huang M (2000) Corticotropin-releasing factor receptor type I mediates stress-induced relapse to opiate dependence in rats. NeuroReport 11:2373–2378PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mantione M, van de BW, Schuurman PR, Denys D (2010) Smoking cessation and weight loss after chronic deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens: therapeutic and research implications: case report. Neurosurgery 66:E218Google Scholar
  28. McCracken CB, Grace AA (2009) Nucleus accumbens deep brain stimulation produces region-specific alterations in local field potential oscillations and evoked responses in vivo. J Neurosci 29:5354–5363PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McFarland K, Kalivas PW (2001) The circuitry mediating cocaine-induced reinstatement of drug-seeking behavior. J Neurosci 21:8655–8663PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Mueller D, Stewart J (2000) Cocaine-induced conditioned place preference: reinstatement by priming injections of cocaine after extinction. Behav Brain Res 115:39–47PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Müller UJ, Sturm V, Voges J, Heinze HJ, Galazky I, Heldmann M, Scheich H, Bogerts B (2009) Successful treatment of chronic resistant alcoholism by deep brain stimulation of nucleus accumbens: first experience with three cases. Pharmacopsychiatry 42:288–291PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Naqvi NH, Bechara A (2010) The insula and drug addiction: an interoceptive view of pleasure, urges, and decision-making. Brain Struct FunctGoogle Scholar
  33. Naqvi NH, Rudrauf D, Damasio H, Bechara A (2007) Damage to the insula disrupts addiction to cigarette smoking. Science 315:531–534PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. O’Brien CP, Gardner EL (2005) Critical assessment of how to study addiction and its treatment: Human and non-human animal models. Pharmacol Ther 108:18–58PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. O’Connor EC, Chapman K, Butler P, Mead AN (2011) The predictive validity of the rat self-administration model for abuse liability. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 35:912–938PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Peters J, LaLumiere RT, Kalivas PW (2008) Infralimbic prefrontal cortex is responsible for inhibiting cocaine seeking in extinguished rats. J Neurosci 28:6046–6053PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rouaud T, Lardeux S, Panayotis N, Paleressompoulle D, Cador M, Baunez C (2009) Reducing the desire for cocaine with subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:1196–1200PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sanchez CJ, Sorg BA (2001) Conditioned fear stimuli reinstate cocaine-induced conditioned place preference. Brain Res 908:86–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. See RE, Fuchs RA, Ledford CC, McLaughlin J (2003) Drug addiction, relapse, and the amygdala. Ann N Y Acad Sci 985:294–307PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shaham Y, Stewart J (1996) Effects of opioid and dopamine receptor antagonists on relapse induced by stress and re-exposure to heroin in rats. Psychopharmacology 125:385–391PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Shaham Y, Erb S, Stewart J (2000) Stress-induced relapse to heroin and cocaine seeking in rats: a review. Brain Res Rev 33:13–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shaham Y, Shalev U, Lu L, de Wit H, Stewart J (2003) The reinstatement model of drug relapse: history, methodology and major findings. Psychopharmacology 168:3–20PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shufman EN, Porat S, Witztum E, Gandacu D, Bar-Hamburger R, Ginath Y (1994) The efficacy of naltrexone in preventing reabuse of heroin after detoxification. Biol Psychiatry 35:935–945PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Spragg SDS (1940) Morphine addiction in chimpanzees. Comp Psychol Monogr 15:1–132Google Scholar
  45. Thompson T, Schuster CR (1964) Morphine self-administration, food-reinforced, and avoidance behaviors in rhesus-monkeys. Psychopharmacologia 5:87–94PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Türe U, Yasargil MG, Al-Mefty O, Yasargil DCH (2000) Arteries of the insula. J Neurosurg 92:676–687PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tzschentke TM (2000) The medial prefrontal cortex as a part of the brain reward system. Amino Acids 19:211–219PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Van De Werd HJ, Uylings HB (2008) The rat orbital and agranular insular prefrontal cortical areas: a cytoarchitectonic and chemoarchitectonic study. Brain Struct Funct 212:387–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Van den Oever MC, Spijker S, Smit AB, De Vries TJ (2010) Prefrontal cortex plasticity mechanisms in drug seeking and relapse. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 35:276–284PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. van Dijk A, Mason O, Klompmakers AA, Feenstra MGP, Denys D (2011) Unilateral deep brain stimulation in the nucleus accumbens core does not affect local monoamine release. J Neurosci Methods 202:113–118PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Vassoler FM, Schmidt HD, Gerard ME, Famous KR, Ciraulo DA, Kornetsky C, Knapp CM, Pierce RC (2008) Deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens shell attenuates cocaine priming-induced reinstatement of drug seeking in rats. J Neurosci 28:8735–8739PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Weeks JR (1962) Experimental morphine addiction—method for automatic intravenous injections in unrestrained rats. Science 138:143–144Google Scholar
  53. Witjas T, Baunez C, Henry JM, Delfini M, Regis J, Cherif AA, Peragut JC, Azulay JP (2005) Addiction in Parkinson’s disease: impact of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation. Mov Disord 20:1052–1055PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rolinka M. C. Schippers
    • 1
  • Tommy Pattij
    • 1
  • Taco J. De Vries
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Anatomy and Neurosciences, Neuroscience Campus AmsterdamVU University Medical CenterAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Molecular and Cellular Neurobiology, Center for Neurogenomics & Cognitive Research, Faculty of Earth and Life SciencesVU University AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Department of Anatomy and NeurosciencesVU University Medical Center, Neuroscience Campus AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations