Skip to main content

Binary Nearest Neighbor Classification of Predicting Pareto Dominance in Multi-objective Optimization

  • Conference paper
Advances in Swarm Intelligence (ICSI 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 7331))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

A method of predicting Pareto dominance in multi-objective optimization using binary nearest neighbor classification (BNNC) is proposed. It encodes real value feature variables into binary bit strings with the same length. The similarity of two feature variables is directly measured by weighted sum of the binary bits. The analysis shows that when the orders of magnitude for various feature variables differ from each other, the similarity measured by scaled feature variables is able to more uniformly reflect the contribution of each feature variable to Pareto dominance relationship, and BNNC has computational complexity of O(N). Experiments results show that, in addition to remarkably increasing classification accuracy rate, it is more efficient and robust than the canonical nearest neighbor rule and Bayesian classification when used to classify those problems with unbalanced class proportions and feature vectors no less than 2 dimensions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Deb, K.: Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms: an introduction. KanGAL Report Number 2011003, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zhou, A., et al.: Multiobjective evolutionary algorithm: A survey of the state of the art. In: Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, vol. 1, pp. 32–49 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Deb, K., et al.: A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 6(2), 182–197 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Zitzler, E., Laumanns, M., Thiele, L.: SPEA2: Improving the strength pareto evolutionary algorithm. In: Giannakoglou, K., Tsahalis, D.T., Périaux, J., Papailiou, K.D., Fogarty, T. (eds.) Evolutionary Methods for Design, Optimization and Control with Applications to Industrial Problems, pp. 95–100. Springer, Berlin (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Knowles, J.D., Corne, D.W.: The Pareto archived evolutionary strategy: A new baseline algorithm for Pareto multiobjective optimization. In: Proc. of CEC 1999, vol. 1, pp. 98–105. IEEE Press, Piscataway (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Coello, A.C.C., Pulido, G.T., Lechuga, M.S.: Handling multiple objectives with particle swarm optimization. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 8(3), 256–279 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Li, X., Li, W.: Problems in complex engineering system optimization design and alternative solution. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering 42(6), 156–160 (2006) (in Chinese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nain, P.K.S., Deb, K.: A multi-objective search and optimization procedure with successive approximate models. KanGAL Report 2004012, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Guo, G., Li, W., Yang, B., Li, W., Yin, C.: Predicting Pareto Dominance in Multi-objective Optimization Using Pattern Recognition. In: 2012 International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Engineering Applications, Sanya, Hainan, China, January 6-7 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Schaffer, J.D.: Multiple objective optimization with vector evaluated genetic algorithms. In: Grefensttete, J.J. (ed.) Proceeding of the First International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, pp. 93–100. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Theodoridis, S., Koutroumbas, K.: Pattern Recognition, 4th edn. China Machine Press (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Poloni, C.: Hybrid GA for multi-objective acrodynamic shape optimization. In: Winter, G., Periaux, J., Galan, M., Cuesta, P. (eds.) Genetic Algorithms in Engineering and Computer Science, pp. 397–414. Wiley, New York (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Viennet, R.: Multi-criteria optimization using a genetic algorithm for determining a Pareto set. International Journal of Systems Science 27(2), 255–260 (1996)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Guo, G., Yin, C., Yan, T., Li, W. (2012). Binary Nearest Neighbor Classification of Predicting Pareto Dominance in Multi-objective Optimization. In: Tan, Y., Shi, Y., Ji, Z. (eds) Advances in Swarm Intelligence. ICSI 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7331. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30976-2_65

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30976-2_65

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-30975-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-30976-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics