Assessment of Sensitivity of Numerical Simulation in Sheet Metal Forming Process Applied for Robust Design

  • Von Dim NguyenEmail author
  • Pierre-Antoine Adragna
  • Pascal Lafon
Part of the Lecture Notes in Production Engineering book series (LNPE)


Considering variation of influent factors is a critical issue to enhance the robustness of sheet metal forming process in the product design process. The stochastic variability of uncontrollable factors results in the variations on the formed part which can lead to rejected parts. Since the inherent sources of variation in the sheet metal forming process comes from part-to-part, within batch and batch-to-batch variation. Therefore, the prediction and control of the variability influencing on the performance of the product is an essential demand of automotive and aeronautic manufacturers. Moreover, it is very necessary to have a numerically dedicated tool which predicts the process variability with a good confidence. In this paper, prediction of the variations of the formed part due to the variabilities of the sheet stamping process and the workpiece by numerical simulation will be carried out.


robust design variability sheet metal forming sensitivity analysis 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Ledoux, Y., Sébastian, P., Samper, S.: Optimization method for stamping tolls under reliability constraints using genetic algorithms and finite element simulations. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 210, 474–486 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lee, S.W., Yang, D.Y.: An assessment of numerical parameters influencing springback in explicit finite element analysis of sheet metal forming process. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 80-81, 60–67 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jansson, T., Nilsson, L., Moshfegh, R.: Reliability analysis of a sheet metal forming process using Monte Carlo analysis and metamodels. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 202, 255–268 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mattiasson, K., Thilderkvist, P., Strange, A., Samuelsson, A.: Simulation of springback in sheet metal forming. In: Shen, S., Dawson, P.R. (eds.) Proc. NUMIFORM 1995, Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 115–124 (1995)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    He, N., Wagoner, R.H.: Springback simulation in sheet metal forming. In: Lee, J.K., Kinzel, G.L., Wagoner, R.H. (eds.) Proc. NUMISHEET 1996, pp. 308–315. Ohio State University, OH (1996)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chung, W.J., Cho, J.W., Belytschko, T.: A study on dynamics effects of dynamic explicit FEM in sheet metal forming. In: Lee, J.K., Kinzel, G.L., Wagoner, R.H. (eds.) Proc. NUMISHEET 1996, pp. 414–420. Ohio State University (1996)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Li, K., Carden, W.P., Wagoner, R.H.: Simulation of springback. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 44, 79–101 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Xu, W.L., Ma, C.H., Feng, W.J.: Sensitivity factors in springback simulation for sheet metal forming. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 22, 151–217 (2004)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hill, R.: A theory of the yielding and plastic flow of anisotropic metal. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 193, 281–297 (1948)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Taylor, L.M., Cao, J., Karafillis, A.P., Boyce, M.C.: Numerical Simulation of Sheet Metal Forming. In: Proceedings of 2nd International Conference, NUMISHEET 1993, Ishehara, Japan (1993)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Von Dim Nguyen
    • 1
    Email author
  • Pierre-Antoine Adragna
    • 1
  • Pascal Lafon
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Mechanical Systems and Concurrent Engineering (LASMIS)University of Technology of TroyesTroyes CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations