Advertisement

Towards a Context-Driven Front End in New Product Development

  • Christer W. ElverumEmail author
  • Torgeir Welo
Part of the Lecture Notes in Production Engineering book series (LNPE)

Abstract

The fuzzy front end (FFE) of new product development (NPD) has been an important area of research during the last decade. The FFE is recognized by several researchers as the part of the innovation process where most substantial improvements can be achieved with minimum cost. This paper investigates former research to determine if there is a common perception of the FFE. Referring to state of the art and the nature of the FFE, it is argued that an ‘ideal’ FFE model brings limited value to a firm. A number of contextual factors that influence the characteristics of the FFE are presented to further argue this finding. That is, the context is far too important to be overlooked in the search for a FFE strategy.

Keywords

fuzzy front end innovation concept development 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Carlson, C.R., Wilmot, W.W.: Innovation: The Five Disciplines for Creating What Customers Want. Crown Business, US (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Koen, P., et al.: Fuzzy Front End: Effective Methods, Tools, and Techniques. In: Belliveau, P., Griffin, A., Somermeyer, S. (eds.) The PDMA ToolBook for New Product Development 1, pp. 5–35. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cooper, R.G.: Winning At New Products. KOGAN PAGE, New York (1988)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Koen, P.: The Fuzzy Front End for Incremental, Platform, and Breakthrough Products. In: Kahn, K.B. (ed.) The PDMA Handbook of New Product Development, pp. 81–91. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Smith, P.G., Reinertsen, D.G.: The Strategist’s Role in Shortening Product Development. The Journal of Business Strategy 12(4), 18–22 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Reinertsen, D.G.: Taking the fuzziness out of the fuzzy front end. Research-Technology Management 42(6), 25–31 (1999)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Breuer, H., Hewing, M., Steinhoff, F.: Divergent Innovation: Fostering and Managing the Fuzzy Front End of Innovation. In: Proceedings of Picmet 2009 - Technology Management in the Age of Fundamental Change, vols. 1-5, pp. 744–751 (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Backman, M., Borjesson, S., Setterberg, S.: Working with concepts in the fuzzy front end: exploring the context for innovation for different types of concepts at Volvo Cars. R & D Management 37(1), 17–28 (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chang, H.W., Wei, C.C., Lin, R.J.: A model for selecting product ideas in fuzzy front end. Concurrent Engineering-Research and Applications 16(2), 121–128 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kiewiet, D.J., Van Engelen, J., Achterkamp, M.: The fuzziness of the fuzzy front end: the influence of non-technical factors. In: ISMOT 2007: Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Management of Technology, vol. 1 and 2, pp. 330–333 (2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kim, J., Wilemon, D.: Focusing the fuzzy front-end in new product development. R & D Management 32(4), 269–279 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Corallo, A., et al.: Enhancing Knowledge sharing in “Fuzzy Front End” of NPD: An Aerospace Case Study. In: Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Knowledge Management, vol. 1 and 2, pp. 288–295 (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kurkkio, M., Frishammar, J., Lichtenthaler, U.: Where process development begins: A multiple case study of front end activities in process firms. Technovation 31(9), 490–504 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Koen, P., et al.: Providing clarity and a common language to the “Fuzzy Front End”. Research-Technology Management 44(2), 46–55 (2001)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Reid, S.E., de Brentani, U.: The fuzzy front end of new product development for discontinuous innovations: A theoretical model. Journal of Product Innovation Management 21(3), 170–184 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hüsig, S., Kohn, S.: Factors influencing the front end of the innovation process: A comprehensive review of selected empirical NPD and explorative FFE studies. In: 10th International Product Development Management Conference 2003, Brussels, Belgium (2003)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Khurana, A., Rosenthal, S.R.: Towards holistic “front ends” in new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management 15(1), 57–74 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hüsig, S., Kohn, S.: Factors influencing the front end of the innovation process: A comprehensive review of selected empirical NPD and explorative FFE studies. In: 10th International Product Development Management Conference 2003, Brussels, Belgium, p. 15 (2003)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cooper, R.G.: A Process Model for Industrial New Product Development. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 30(1), 2–11 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nobelius, D., Trygg, L.: Stop chasing the Front End process — management of the early phases in product development projects. International Journal of Project Management 20(5), 331–340 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ulrich, T.K., Eppinger, D.S.: Product Design and Development. McGraw-Hill (2012)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Garcia, R., Calantone, R.: A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review. Journal of Product Innovation Management 19(2), 110–132 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    de Brentani, U., Reid, S.E.: The Fuzzy Front-End of Discontinuous Innovation: Insights for Research and Management. Journal of Product Innovation Management 29(1), 70–87 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Martin, R.L.: The Design of Business: Why Design Thinking is the Next Competitive Advantage. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (2009)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Flint, D.J.: Compressing new product success-to-success cycle time - Deep customer value understanding and idea generation. Industrial Marketing Management 31(4), 305–315 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Vonhippel, E.: Customer-Active Paradigm for Industrial Product Idea Generation. Research Policy 7(3), 240–266 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Leifer, R., O’Connor, G.C., Rice, M.: Implementing radical innovation in mature firms: The role of hubs. Academy of Management Executive 15(3), 102–113 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    McDermott, C.M., O’Connor, G.C.: Managing radical innovation: an overview of emergent strategy issues. Journal of Product Innovation Management 19(6), 424–438 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Engineering Design and MaterialsNTNUTrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations