Advertisement

A Template for Design for eXcellence (DfX) Methods

  • Juan Manuel Jauregui BeckerEmail author
  • Wessel W. Wits
Part of the Lecture Notes in Production Engineering book series (LNPE)

Abstract

Design for eXcellence (DfX) entails a wide range of goal specific design methods targeting different phases of a product’s lifecycle. These methods are often not standardized and sometimes even have contradicting rules among them. As a consequence, design processes experience an increase in organizational entropy. This paper presents a template for DfX methods. The goal is to assist the industry in setting up lean design processes. The results of this research are threefold: (1) standardization of DfX design tasks and information flows, (2) facilitating the implementation of DfX methods and (3) enable benchmarking of DfX methods to purify design processes.

Keywords

Design method Knowledge management Design for eXcellence (DfX) 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Boothroyd, G., Alting, L.: Design for Assembly and Disassembly. CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology 41(2), 625–636 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chiu, M.-C., Okudan, G.: Investigation of the Applicability of Design for X Tools during Design Concept Evolution: A Literature Review. International Journal of Product Development (September 2010) (in press)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Meerkamm, H., Koch, M., Clarkson, J.: Design for X. Design process improvement, pp. 306–323. Springer, London (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fabricius, F.: A seven step procedure for design for manufacture. World Class Design for Manufacture 1(2), 23–30 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boothroyd, G.: Product design for manufacture and assembly. Computer Aided Design 26(7), 505–520 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boothroyd, G., Radovanovic, P.: Estimating the Cost of Machined Components During the Conceptual Design of a Product. CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology 38(1), 157–160 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Goncalves-Coelho, A.M., Mourao, A.J.F.: Axiomatic design as support for decision-making in a design for manufacturing context: a case study. Int. J. Production Economics 109(1-2), 81–89 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Huang, G.Q., Mak, K.L.: Design for manufacture and assembly on the internet. Computers in Industry 38(1), 17–30 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    La Trobe-Bateman, J., Wild, D.: Design for manufacturing: use of a spreadsheet model of manufacturability to optimize product design and development. Research in Engineering Design 14(2), 107–117 (2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    van Vliet, H.W., van Luttervelt, K.: Development and application of a mixed product/process-based DFM methodology. Int. J. Computer Integrated Manufacturing 17(3), 224–234 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ljungberg, L.Y.: Materials selection and design for development of sustainable products. Materials and Design 28(2), 466–479 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gu, P., Hashemian, M., Nee, A.Y.C.: Adaptable design. CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology 53(2), 539–557 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kasarda, M.E., Terpenny, J.P., Inman, D., Precoda, K.R., Jelesko, J., Sahin, A., Park, J.: Design for Adaptability (DFAD) – a new concept for achieving sustainable design. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 23(6), 727–734 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Waage, S.A.: Re-considering product design: a practical ‘road-map’ for integration of sustainability issues. J. of Cleaner Production 15(7), 638–649 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Short, T.D., Lynch, C.A.: Beyond the eco-functional matrix – design for sustainability and the Durham methodology. In: Design and Manufacture for Sustainable Development Conf., Loughborough, UK, September 1-2 (2004)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Howarth, G., Hadfield, M.: A sustainable product design model. Materials and Design 27(10), 1128–1133 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ijomah, W.L., McMahon, C.A., Hammond, G.P., Newman, S.T.: Development of robust design-for-remanufacturing guidelines to further the aims of sustainable development. Int. J. of Production Research 45(18-19), 4513–4536 (2007)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kuo, T.C., Zhang, H.-C.: Design for manufacturability and design for “X”: concepts, applications, and perspectives. In: 17th IEEE/CPMT International. Manufacturing Technologies - Present and Future, pp. 446–459 (1995)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Huang, G.Q.: Towards a generic Design for X (DfX) shell. In: Gill, R., Syan, C.S. (eds.) Proceedings of 12th International Conference on CADCAM, Robotics, and Factories of the Future, pp. 940–945. Middlesex University, London (1996)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tichem, M.: A design coordination approach to design for X. Delft University of Technology, Autores (1996)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tomiyama, T., Gul, P., Jin, Y., Lutters, E., Kind, C., Kimura, F.: Design methodologies: Industrial and educational applications. CIRP Annals 58(2), 543–565 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schotborgh, W.O., McMahon, C.A., van Houten, F.: A knowledge acquisition method to model parametric engineering design processes. Int. J. Computer Aided Engineering and Technology (2012) (paper accepted for publication)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    McMahon, C.A.: Observations on modes of incremental change in design. Journal of Engineering Design 5(3), 195 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Weber, C.: CPM/PDD – an extended theoretical approach to modelling products and product development processes. In: Proceedings of the 2nd German-Israeli Symposium on Advances in Methods and Systems for Development of Products and Processes, pp. 159–179. Fraunhofer-IRB-Verlag, Stuttgart (2005)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cagan, J., Campbell, M.I., Finger, S., Tomiyama, T.: A framework for computational design synthesis: Model and applications. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering 5(3), 171–181 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jauregui-Becker, J.M., Tragter, H., van Houten, F.J.A.M.: Structure and models of artifactual routine design problems for computational synthesis. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology 1(3), 120–125 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Das, S.K., Datla, V., Samir, G.: DFQM - An approach for improving the quality of assembled products. International Journal of Production Research 38(2), 457–477 (2000)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Juan Manuel Jauregui Becker
    • 1
    Email author
  • Wessel W. Wits
    • 1
  1. 1.Lab of Design, Production and ManagementUniversity of TwenteEnschedeThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations